Activins, dimers of inhibin beta subunits, are potent stimulators of FSH secretion in vivo and in vitro and of FSH beta mRNA expression in rat anterior pituitary cultures. In this study, we investigated the possibility that locally secreted activin B (beta B beta B) may function as an autocrine modulator of basal FSH secretion and expression based on the previous observation that beta B is expressed within gonadotropes. The incubation of cultured rat anterior pituitary cells with a m mouse monoclonal antibody specific for the activin B homodimer (MAb-activin B) significantly attenuated the basal secretion of FSH in a concentration- and time-dependent manner, without influencing LH secretion. Moreover, MAb-activin B selectively inhibited FSH beta mRNA accumulation without affecting either LH beta or alpha subunit mRNAs. The MAb-activin B completely blocked the stimulation of FSH secretion by exogenous activin B, but not by activin A, confirming its specificity. As previously shown, inhibin A and follistatin significantly suppressed basal FSH secretion in these cultures. This inhibitory effect, albeit of lower magnitude, was still evident even in the presence of the MAb-activin B which by itself suppressed basal FSH secretion. These data suggest that the secretion of activin B by the gonadotropes of the anterior pituitary may serve as an autocrine signal in the selective modulation of FSH expression and secretion. Furthermore, the inhibitory actions of inhibins and follistatins on gonadotropes may, in part, be explained by their ability to interfere with the actions of endogenous activin B.
IntroductionAnterior-gradient 2 (AGR2) is an estrogen-responsive secreted protein. Its upregulation has been well documented in a number of cancers, particularly breast cancer, for which mixed data exist on the prognostic implications of AGR2 expression. Although emerging evidence indicates that AGR2 is associated with poor prognosis, its function and impact on cancer-relevant pathways have not been elucidated in breast cancer.MethodsTo investigate the biologic role of AGR2 in breast cancer, AGR2 was transiently knocked down, by using siRNA, in T47 D and ZR-75-1 (estrogen receptor-α (ER)-positive) and MDA-MB-231 and SK-BR-3 (ER-negative) human breast cancer cell lines. The impact of silencing AGR2 was evaluated in both anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent growth (soft agar, spheroid) assays. Cell-cycle profiles in ER-positive cell lines were determined with BrdU incorporation, and cell death was measured with Annexin V, JC-1, and F7-26 staining. After transiently silencing AGR2 or stimulating with recombinant AGR2, modulation of key regulators of growth and survival pathways was assessed with Western blot. Combination studies of AGR2 knockdown with the antiestrogens tamoxifen and fulvestrant were carried out and assessed at the level of anchorage-dependent growth inhibition and target modulation (cyclin D1, ER).ResultsAGR2 knockdown inhibited growth in anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent assays, with a more-pronounced effect in ER-positive cell lines. Cyclin D1 levels and BrdU incorporation were reduced with AGR2 knockdown. Conversely, cyclin D1 was induced with recombinant AGR2. AGR2 knockdown induced cell death in ZR-75-1 and T47 D cells, and also downregulated survivin and c-Myc. Evidence of AGR2-ER crosstalk was demonstrated by a reduction of ER at the protein level after transiently silencing AGR2. AGR2 knockdown in combination with fulvestrant or tamoxifen did not preclude the efficacy of the antiestrogens, but enhanced it. In addition, p-Src, implicated in tamoxifen resistance, was downregulated with AGR2 knockdown.ConclusionsTransiently silencing AGR2 in ER-positive breast cancer cell lines inhibited cell growth and cell-cycle progression and induced cell death. Breast cancer drivers (ER and cyclin D1) as well as cancer-signaling nodes (pSrc, c-Myc, and survivin) were demonstrated to be downstream of AGR2. Collectively, the data presented support the utility of anti-AGR2 therapy in ER-positive breast cancers because of its impact on cancer-relevant pathways.
Thrombopoietin (TPO) is a hematopoietin important for megakaryocyte proliferation and production of blood platelets. We sought to characterize how TPO binds and activates its receptor, myeloproliferative leukemia virus receptor. The erythropoietin-like domain of TPO (TPO 1-153 ) has been fused to the gIII coat protein of M13 bacteriophage. Forty residues were chosen for mutation to alanine using the criteria that they were charged residues or predicted to be solvent-exposed, based on a homology model. Phage enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to determine affinities for binding to both the TPO receptor and five anti-TPO ) caused the greatest reduction in receptor-binding affinity. Most of these residues mapped to helices-1 and -4 and a loop region between helix-1 and helix-2. Two of the monoclonal antibodies that blocked TPO binding and bioactivity had determinants in helix-4. In contrast, the other three monoclonal antibodies, which were effective at blocking TPO activity but did not block initial binding of TPO to its receptor, had epitopes predominantly on helix or 3. These results suggest that TPO has two distinct receptor-binding sites that function to dimerize TPO receptors in a sequential fashion. Thrombopoietin (TPO)1 is the hematopoietic cytokine responsible for stimulation of megakaryocyte formation and regulation of platelet release (1-3). The gene for TPO encodes a 38-kDa protein (332 amino acids) that can be divided into two distinct domains (1, 4). The N-terminal region (153 amino acids) is predicted to be a four-helix bundle and has considerable sequence similarity to erythropoietin (EPO; 23% amino acid identity), whereas the C-terminal domain has no homology to known proteins and contains several asparagine-linked glycosylation sites. A number of studies have indicated that the N-terminal domain, TPO 1-153 , is responsible for binding and activation of the TPO receptor (MPL) (1, 5). The extracellular domain of the receptor for TPO has considerable sequence similarity to the other receptors in the class I hematopoietin receptor superfamily (6).The four-helix bundle cytokines typically activate their receptors by homo-or hetero-oligomerization in which two distinct binding sites on a single hormone sequentially bind two of the same receptor molecules or two or more different receptor molecules, respectively (for recent review, see Ref. 7). The receptor binding sites for a number of cytokines (hGH, human prolactin, IL-4, IL-6, and EPO) map to similar regions of the hormone: one of these sites (site 1) has primary determinants in helix-4 and the loop connecting helix-1 and helix-2, whereas the other site (site 2) has primary determinants in helix-1 and helix-3. In the case of hGH, site 1 binds first followed by site 2 (8); for IL-4, site 2 appears to bind first followed by site 1 (9). We wondered if TPO contains two distinct receptor binding sites, and if so, do these map to regions seen for the other members of this class.Alanine-scanning mutagenesis has been used to probe binding determinant...
The HER2/neu oncogene product, p185(HER2/neu), is overexpressed on the surface of many human breast cancers. Strains of transgenic mice have been developed that express the rat neu oncogene in mammary epithelial cells and develop spontaneous mammary tumors that overexpress p185neu. This model provides an ideal system for testing interventions to prevent tumor development. In this study, we immunized neu-transgenic mice with a vaccine consisting of the extracellular domain of p185neu (NeuECD). Immunized mice developed Neu-specific humoral immune responses, as measured by circulating anti-Neu antibodies in their sera, and cellular immune responses, as measured by lymphocyte proliferation to NeuECD in vitro. In addition, the subsequent development of mammary tumors was significantly lower in immunized mice than in controls and vaccine treatment was associated with a significant increase in median survival.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.