2009
DOI: 10.1038/onc.2008.481
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Suppression of breast cancer cell growth by a monoclonal antibody targeting cleavable ErbB4 isoforms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21] An explanation for conflicting observations may be that different isoforms and the subcellular localizations of ERBB4 differ in function. Analyzing functionally dissimilar isoforms can complicate the cancer biology of ERBB4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[18][19][20][21] An explanation for conflicting observations may be that different isoforms and the subcellular localizations of ERBB4 differ in function. Analyzing functionally dissimilar isoforms can complicate the cancer biology of ERBB4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18,23,24 In addition, some researchers have not distinguished between the membranous, cytoplasmic, and nuclear expression of ERBB4 in evaluating clinical outcomes. 25 In the present study, ERBB4 expression was predominantly localized to the cytoplasm in all ovarian serous carcinoma samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, ERBB4 likely induces cell survival through more than one pathway; for example, the antiapoptotic response to high levels of overexpression and heterodimerization with EGFR depend on COX-2 activity (4), whereas modest, selective ERBB4 activation with its specific ligand NRG4 protects cells from cytokine-induced death in a COX-2 independent manner (7). Further study is required to distinguish between these two possibilities and thus define the potential utility of isoform-specific targeting approaches as have been proposed for some cancers (55).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether genetic or sporadic in origin, the conversion of normal cells to malignant cancer cells requires multiple alterations at both the gene and chromosome levels (Hollmen et al, 2009 andTovey et al, 2006). Evidence in favor of this concept comes from the observation of multiple genetic alterations such as deletions, insertions, amplifications, rearrangement, recombination and point mutations in the tumor genome.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%