No abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the physicochemical properties of TA ointments and conduct a human sensory test to assess the properties of those ointments. Physicochemical assessment was done via near-infrared (NIR) absorption spectroscopy, measurement of water content, microscopy, and measurement of viscoelasticity. The human sensory test examined 5 aspects (texture, cohesiveness, spreadability, smell, and feel). Three TA ointments were used: TA-A, a brand-name preparation, and TA-B and TA-C, two generics. The sensory test revealed significant differences between TA-A and TA-B and TA-C in terms of cohesiveness and spreadability. Significant differences between TA-A and TA-C and between TA-B and TA-C in terms of feel were noted. Microscopic examination revealed that TA-C had good dispersibility while TA-A and TA-B produced crystallization. NIR spectroscopy revealed differences in absorption spectra attributed to oil and water content in TAA, TA-B, and TA-C. Measurement of water content indicated water content of 0.06 ± 0.02% for TA-A, 0.08 ± 0.08% for TA-B, and 36.7 ± 1.19% for TA-C. Assessment of viscoelasticity indicated that stress decreased for all 3 ointments at 35 °C compared to that at 25 °C. TA-A and TA-B were found to have a higher percent decrease in stress than was TA-C. These findings indicate that differences in the types and content of additives caused differences in the physicochemical properties of individual ointments. In addition, differences in physicochemical properties presumably resulted in the close correlation between cohesiveness and spreadability in the sensory test.

In dermatology, ointments are often mixed as part of drug therapy, but mixing often leads to incompatibility. Three combinations of tetracycline ointment (TC-o) and acyclovir cream (ACV-cr) were prepared at a TC-o:ACV-cr ratio of 1:1 using a brand-name ACV-cr and two generic ACV-cr (samples TC-o+ACV-A, TC-o+ACV-B, and TC-o+ACV-C). Microscopic examination revealed separation in TC-o+ACV-C. Viscosity and elasticity measurement indicated that the storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G″) of each of the TC-o+ACV-cr mixtures behaved similarly to those of an ACV-cr and the loss tangent (tanδ) behaved similarly to that of a TC ointment. In addition, differences in the storage modulus (G') and loss modulus (G″) of the TC-o+ACV-cr mixtures were noted. To assess stability, each TC-o+ACV-cr mixture was stored away from direct sunlight at 25 °C and an RH of 84% and at 4 °C (in a refrigerator). HPLC revealed that the ACV content in each TC-o+ACV-cr mixture remained at 95-105% for up to 14 days under both sets of storage conditions. A decline in TC content in each TC-o+ACV-cr mixture was not noted with storage at 4 °C but was noted over time with storage at 25 °C and an RH of 84%. In addition, significant differences in the percent decline in TC content in each TC-o+ACV-cr mixture occurred with storage at 25 °C and an RH of 84%. Thus, differences in physical properties and stability may occur when combining brand-name and generic drugs, and temperature and humidity may be the cause of the TC-o's incompatibility.