We have constructed a composite image of the fault systems of the M 6.7 San Fernando (1971) and Northridge (1994), California, earthquakes, using industry reflection and oil test well data in the upper few kilometers of the crust, relocated aftershocks in the seismogenic crust, and LARSE II (Los Angeles Region Seismic Experiment, Phase II) reflection data in the middle and lower crust. In this image, the San Fernando fault system appears to consist of a decollement that extends 50 km northward at a dip of ϳ25؇ from near the surface at the Northridge Hills fault, in the northern San Fernando Valley, to the San Andreas fault in the middle to lower crust. It follows a prominent aseismic reflective zone below and northward of the main-shock hypocenter. Interpreted upward splays off this decollement include the Mission Hills and San Gabriel faults and the two main rupture planes of the San Fernando earthquake, which appear to divide the hanging wall into shingleor wedge-like blocks. In contrast, the fault system for the Northridge earthquake appears simple, at least east of the LARSE II transect, consisting of a fault that extends 20 km southward at a dip of ϳ33؇ from ϳ7 km depth beneath the Santa Susana Mountains, where it abuts the interpreted San Fernando decollement, to ϳ20 km depth beneath the Santa Monica Mountains. It follows a weak aseismic reflective zone below and southward of the mainshock hypocenter. The middle crustal reflective zone along the interpreted San Fernando decollement appears similar to a reflective zone imaged beneath the San Gabriel Mountains along the LARSE I transect, to the east, in that it appears to connect major reverse or thrust faults in the Los Angeles region to the San Andreas fault. However, it differs in having a moderate versus a gentle dip and in containing no mid-crustal bright reflections.

In 1999, the U.S. Geological Survey and the Southern California Earth-

Tailings facility failures represent a significant risk to the environment and communities globally, but until now little data was available on the global distribution of risks and characteristics of facilities to ensure proper governance. We conducted a survey and compiled a database with information on tailings facilities disclosed by extractive companies at the request of institutional investors. Despite limitations in the data, this information disclosure request represents the most comprehensive survey of tailings facilities ever undertaken. The compiled dataset includes 1743 tailings facilities and provides insights into a range of topics including construction method, stability, consequence of failure, stored volume, and the rate of uptake of alternative technologies to dewater tailings and reduce geotechnical risk. Our analysis reveals that 10 per cent of tailings facilities reported notable stability concerns or failure to be confirmed or certified as stable at some point in their history, with distinct trends according to construction method, governance, age, height, volume and seismic hazard. Controversy has surrounded the safety of tailings facilities, most notably upstream facilities, for many years but in the absence of definitive empirical data differentiating the risks of different facility types, upstream facilities have continued to be used widely by the industry and a consensus has emerged that upstream facilities can theoretically be built safely under the right circumstances. Our findings reveal that in practice active upstream facilities report a higher incidence of stability issues (18.3%) than other facility types, and that this elevated risk persists even when these facilities are built in high governance settings. In-pit/natural landform and dry-stack facilities report lower incidence of stability issues, though the rate of stability issues is significant by engineering standards (> 2 per cent) across all construction methods, highlighting the universal importance of careful facility management and governance. The insights reported here can assist the global governance of tailings facility stability risks.

No abstract

Field experiments, involving various fungicide strategies with pyraclostrobin and/or epoxiconazole were carried out in 2004 and 2005, with the overall purpose of monitoring the evolution of fungicide sensitivity in Mycosphaerella graminicola on different isolates per leaf, leaf levels at different points of time, and points in the field. Sensitivity was assessed on single isolates by means of epoxiconazole EC 50 -values, and monitoring of the G143A-mutation, which confers strobilurin resistance. In both years, fungicide application strategies did not cause any significant shifts in epoxiconazole sensitivity of the population median or variance over time compared to the starting population. In 2004, the end-population median was the same for all sprayed strategies, although compared to untreated median sensitivities were higher. In 2005, epoxiconazole sensitivity levels were similar on individual flag leaves and different points in the field. Measured on all isolates the EC 50 -values ranged from 0.007-1.15 mg l −1 . In 2004, due to the high initial level of pyraclostrobin resistance, stabilisation of pyraclostrobin resistance was observed following the various combination treatments. No correlation between epoxiconazole sensitivities and pyraclostrobin resistance were observed. High input strategies using a mixture of epoxiconazole and pyraclostrobin resulted in the best control and yield response. A subpopulation of the isolates from 2004 was also screened for sensitivity towards five different triazoles of which tebuconazole proved to be least sensitive, and this could further be split into two subpopulations.