The use of systemic antibiotics for major head and neck surgical procedures involving the upper aerodigestive tract is now accepted as an important part of perioperative patient care. Despite knowledge of the high counts of bacteria present in saliva, no preoperative regimen for preparing the mouth has been standardized. Surgical wounds come in contact with saliva during the course of many head and neck procedures. While wound infection rates have been decreased with the use of prophylactic systemic antibiotics, serious morbidity still exists from postoperative wound infections. Reducing the bacterial counts in saliva preoperatively may further decrease wound infection rates. A prospective randomized pilot study of twenty healthy human subjects compared the effects of an oral rinse with clindamycin vs. a placebo rinse of normal saline. There was a statistically significant reduction in both aerobic and anaerobic colony counts in the clindamycin group at 4 hours after treatment. For the group that rinsed with placebo, there was an actual increase in counts 4 hours after treatment. It is concluded that oral rinses with clindamycin can reduce the bacterial content of saliva for a sufficient length of time to be effective as a preoperative prophylactic measure for head and neck surgery involving the upper aerodigestive tract. Future studies are planned to evaluate other potentially effective agents. A logical continuation is a clinical study of preoperative and postoperative rinses.

Wound infections remain a significant source of morbidity in patients undergoing major head and neck operations that invade the aerodigestive tract. Infection rates have been significantly reduced by the administration of perioperative intravenous antibiotics; however, the incidence of infection remains unacceptably high. This study was undertaken to help identify an oral antiseptic that could significantly reduce the bacterial colony count of human saliva. A randomized, prospective clinical trial was conducted to analyze and compare the effects of Listerine antiseptic and Peridex oral rinse on the aerobic and anaerobic bacterial counts in healthy human subjects. Thirty healthy adult volunteers between the ages of 18 and 61 participated in the study. The patients were randomized to receive normal saline solution, Listerine antiseptic, or Peridex oral rinse. Aerobic and anaerobic bacterial colony counts of saliva were measured before treatment and at 1 and 4 hours after treatment. Both Listerine antiseptic and Peridex oral rinse significantly reduced bacterial counts at 1 hour after treatment in our volunteers. At 4 hours after treatment, Peridex oral rinse showed a further reduction in the bacterial colony count whereas Listerine antiseptic showed no difference compared with normal saline solution. At 4 hours after treatment, Peridex oral rinse reduced the total bacterial colony count by 85%.

Like cells respond to injury through repair mechanisms unique for each cell type (eg, regeneration of the epidermis, granulation over exposed fat). How simultaneous chemical peel affects a local skin flap and why minimal differences in chemical peels can result in significant differences in outcome is not fully understood. In this study guinea pig skin was exposed to skin flap elevation, chemical peel, or a combination of the two. Biopsy specimens were taken at 3 to 35 days after injury and the histologic sections were studied. Results demonstrate that (1) lifting a flap causes changes in the subcutaneous tissue and reticular dermis that makes it more vulnerable to secondary injury and (2) the reticular dermis responds to injury as two physiologically distinct layers, although it appears histologically homogeneous. The upper reticular dermis heals by reorganization, while the deeper reticular dermis heals by scar formation. The differing response to injury of these cell layers may in part explain the low safety margin in aggressive chemical peels.

No abstract