One hundred and seven patients with chronic heart failure (NYHA class II to IV) stabilized on digitalis and/or diuretics, recruited from 11 centres were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled study to assess the effect of 12 weeks of cilazapril therapy on exercise tolerance and clinical status. Thirty-five patients were randomized to placebo and 72 to cilazapril at a starting dose of 1 mg daily; titration to cilazapril 2.5 mg at week 4 and 5 mg at week 8 (or matching placebo) was carried out in patients who did not improve clinically. Demographic characteristics, including exercise test duration increased from 402 s (+/- 17 SEM) at baseline to 462 s (+/- 19 SEM) at week 12 for the cilazapril group (+15%) and from 405 s (+/- 23 SEM) at baseline to 408 s (+/- 30 SEM) at week 12 in patients on placebo (+1%) (P < 0.001). In the placebo group, patients able to exercise for more than 6 min at baseline showed an increase in exercise duration at week 12 while those able to exercise for up to 6 min at baseline showed a decrease (P = ns). In contrast, cilazapril-treated patients showed an increase in exercise tolerance regardless of baseline exercise test duration; patients with the most impaired exercise tolerance at baseline showed a greater improvement than patients with mildly impaired baseline exercise tolerance (P < 0.05 vs placebo). NYHA class improved by at least one grade in 51% of the cilazapril group vs 32% in the placebo group (P = ns). At the end of the trial, 15% of the patients were non-responders on cilazapril vs 41% on placebo (P < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The ideal therapy for patients with chronic heart failure should reduce symptoms related to pulmonary congestion or low perfusion, prevent the progression of left ventricular dysfunction and, ultimately, should reduce mortality. Extensive studies in humans have investigated the effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors on these goals of therapy. As an example, the ACE inhibitor cilazapril significantly improved exercise tolerance, as borne out by a meta-analysis of six placebo-controlled, randomized 3-month trials. Comparison of the effects of cilazapril and captopril vs. placebo in one of the trials documented similar improvement in exercise tolerance (14 vs. 17%). Results from other randomized comparative trials suggest that the improvement in symptoms represents a class effect of ACE inhibitors. A beneficial effect of ACE inhibition on the progression of left ventricular dysfunction has also been demonstrated in the SOLVD trial, and a reduction of mortality has been amply documented in several mortality trials (CONSENSUS I, SOLVD, V-HeFT-II, SAVE, AIRE, SMILE) in patients with or without preceding myocardial infarction. Reports that ACE inhibitors also reduce the incidence of reinfarction after myocardial infarction have not been confirmed in all studies but raise the interesting concept that ACE inhibition may interact, in a beneficial but thus far not well-understood way, with key processes in the development of atherosclerosis, thereby preventing plaque rupture, thrombus formation, and myocardial infarction. Taken together, a large database convincingly demonstrates that ACE inhibitors are effective not only in improving symptoms but also in the prevention of progression of left ventricular dysfunction, in the reduction of mortality, and possibly in stabilizing the atherosclerotic disease process.

Objective-To measure quality of life (QOL) in patients with mild to moderate heart failure treated with angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors cilazapril or captopril. Design-Randomised, double blind, placebo controlled, parallel groups trial. Subjects-367 patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) heart failure class II (62%), III (36%) or IV (1%). Methods-Patients were randomised to receive cilazapril 1 mg daily (n = 191) or captopril 25 mg three times daily (n = 90) for 24 weeks, or placebo for 12 weeks followed by cilazapril 1 mg daily for a further 12 weeks (n = 86). If patients had not responded after four weeks cilazapril was increased to 2.5 mg daily and captopril to 50 mg three times daily. QOL was assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks using the sickness impact profile (SIP), the profile of mood states (POMS), the Mahler index of dyspnoea-fatigue, and a health status index (HSI). Results-The physical dimension of the SIP averaged 7 units at baseline and improved after 12 weeks by 2.24 units in the cilazapril group, 2.38 units in the captopril group, and 1.51 units in the placebo group. The diVerence between drug and placebo was therefore 0.73 units (95% CI −0.86 to 2.32) for cilazapril, and 0.87 units (95% CI −0.96 to 2.70) for captopril, with small non-significant eVect sizes (a statistical method for estimating the importance of a treatment related change) of 0.12 and 0.14. Similar results were observed for the total POMS and HSI scores. Although QOL improved more on the ACE inhibitors than on placebo, the eVect sizes were not significant (< 0.26). Conclusions-Improvements in QOL in mild to moderate heart failure were small when treated with cilazapril or captopril compared with placebo.

During chronic treatment, the haemodynamic response to oral cilazapril was attenuated, indicating that continued clinical improvement in patients with CHF on CLZ is independent of to its acute haemodynamic effects.