Relational communication refers to the control or dominance aspects of message exchange in dyads, as distinct from an emphasis on the report or referential aspects of communication. In relational communication analysis, the focus is on messages as transacrions, and the major theoretic concepts which emerge in this analysis are symmetry, transitory, and Complementarity of control. This paper contains a brief review and critique of existing interaction analysis techniques, followed by a detailed discussion of new measurement procedures that capture both the control and processual (time-varying) nature of dyadic interaction. The first step in these procedures yields a code (by speaker) based on the grammatical format of each sequential utterance. The second step yields a translation of each message format and response made into acontrol code, based on the relationship between the message and its immediate predecessor. These codes are next translated into transactional codes, which can then be analyzed in terms of the three major theoretic concepts. These measurement procedures require minimal subjective judgment, particularly at the initial coding level. The paper concludes with a discussion of the ways we are attempting to operationalize major "themes" or patterns of control in lengthy, ongoing dyadic exchanges. This paper describes recently developed procedures for coding and analyzing the relational and processual aspects of interpersonal communication systems. Relational communication refers to the control aspects of message exchange-those elements in message exchange by which interactors reciprocally define the nature of their relative "position" or dominance in their interaction. In popular terms, the notion of being "one-up" or "onedown" indicates two examples of relational control. The theoretic concepts of symmetry, transitory, and complementarity reflect basic types of relational control, and are defined in terms of the similarities or differences in control maneuvers appearing in an interaction; more precise definitions will be given below.An emphasis on the processual aspect of interpersonal communication is equally important in this research, since our goal is to develop operational measures of relational control "patterns" in ongoing interaction systems. In achieving this goal, methodological problems arise in the analysis of sequentially linked messages that differ from those encountered in developing analysis schemes for coding discrete interaction events. We will indicate these problems and discuss how they may be solved.At the conceptual level, the major inputs to relational control analysis come from the work of Bateson (1958), Jackson (1959, 1965), Haley (1963), and Watzlawick, Beavin, and Jackson (1967). At the operational level, the most significant work has been provided by Sluzki and Beavin (1965).Relational communication analysis requires a perspective that differs from the monadic or individual difference orientation that dominates existing analytic techniques. Relational analysis focuses o...

The purpose of this paper is to present a system for describing and indexing patterns of communication at the relational level, primarily in dyadic systems. Relational communication refers to the control aspects of message exchanges that define an interactor's relationships with others. The reciprocal definition of each individual's role at a given moment in the interaction is reflected in the relative control each individual has and/or is given by the other individual. The control‐defining aspects of communication, rather than other information such communication may convey, is the focus of the coding system to be described. Further, the analysis deals with sequences of messages rather than individual messages, and attempts to index the control dimensions of those messages according to their similarity or difference. While previous interaction analysis techniques have been predominantly monadic in nature, i.e., single‐message coding schemes, the present approach is based on a systems level of analysis.1

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract