Background
There is growing concern of mental health issues among South Asian immigrant populations, although limited disaggregated data on determinants of these issues exists. The aim of this study was to examine factors associated with mental health outcomes among South Asian older adult immigrants living in New York City (NYC).
Methods
Data were sourced from a needs assessment among self‐identified South Asians aged 60+ conducted by an NYC‐based frontline agency and nonprofit organization. Variables assessed included the 9‐item Patient Health Questionnaire, degree of difficulty experienced due to depression, loneliness, emotional distress, as well as sociodemographic, living situation, acculturation, general health, and financial related indicators.
Results
Among the 682 responses, 9.4% of participants displayed symptoms of mild or moderate depression (16% of Caribbean‐origin, 10% of Pakistani, 9% of Bangladeshi, and 8% of Indian participants). About a third of participants (29.9%) reported feeling lonely sometimes and 39.1% experienced any type of emotional distress. When compared to those with excellent or very good self‐rated health, having fair, poor, or terrible self‐rated health was associated with a greater adjusted odds ratio (AOR) of having mild or moderate depression (AOR: 8.42, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 22.09) and experiencing emotional distress (AOR: 3.03, 95% CI: 1.88–4.94). Those experiencing emotional distress were more likely to be younger (AOR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95–1.00) and live alone (AOR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.21–3.53).
Discussion
Findings support the need for tailored mental health interventions targeting concerns, such as poor self‐rated health, among South Asian older adult immigrants, as well as specific subpopulations such as Indo‐Caribbeans who may be experiencing a disproportionate burden.
Background and Objectives:In the United States, Black, Hispanic, and Asian Americans suffer from excessively high incidence rates of hemorrhagic stroke compared to White Americans. Women suffer from higher rates of subarachnoid hemorrhage than men. Previous reviews detailing racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in stroke have focused on ischemic stroke. We performed a scoping review of disparities in the diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic stroke in the United States to identify areas of disparities, research gaps, and evidence to inform efforts aimed at health equity.Methods:We included studies published after 2010 that assessed racial and ethnic or sex disparities in the diagnosis or management of patients 18 years or older in the United States with a primary diagnosis of spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage or aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. We did not include studies assessing disparities in incidence, risks, or mortality and functional outcomes of hemorrhagic stroke.Results:After reviewing 6161 abstracts and 441 full texts, 59 studies met our inclusion criteria. Four themes emerged. First, few data address disparities in acute hemorrhagic stroke. Second, racial and ethnic disparities in blood pressure control following intracerebral hemorrhage exist and likely contribute to disparities in recurrence rates. Third, racial and ethnic differences in end-of-life-care exist, but further work is required to understand whether these differences represent true disparities in care. Fourth, very few studies specifically address sex disparities in hemorrhagic stroke care.Discussion:Further efforts are necessary to delineate and correct racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in the diagnosis and management of hemorrhagic stroke.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.