Introduction and Aims Chronic pain is one of the most common health‐related conditions experienced by Americans over the age of 65. In this study, we examine the intersection between pain, opioids and cannabis use among older adults in Colorado and Illinois and examine how medical needs and other variables associated with a persons' background and attitudes influence choices concerning the use of opioids and cannabis to treat pain. Design and Methods Data were collected via a survey about cannabis and opioids use, and questions related to individual need factors (e.g. pain, quality of life) and contextual factors (e.g. sex, finances, personal attitudes, interaction with physicians) were included in this study. We built a logistic regression model to evaluate factors associated with drug use and a multinomial regression model to understand factors that influence drug choices between cannabis and opioids. Results A total of 436 individuals completed the survey; 62 used opioids only, 71 cannabis only and 72 used both. When comparing drug users to non‐drug users, pain was significantly associated with using cannabis and/or opioids when controlling for other covariates. However, when we compared cannabis users to opioid users, pain was no longer a determining factor. Instead, other contextual factors such as sex, personal beliefs and physician attitudes influenced an individual's choice between cannabis or opioids. Discussion and Conclusions This study showed that contextual factors appear to have more influence on an individual's decision to use cannabis as an alternative to opioids than individual need or characteristics.

No abstract

No abstract

Palliative care has been primarily delivered to patients in person since its inception. During the Covid-19 pandemic, providing palliative care was especially challenging for clinicians due to public health measures to contain the virus that required them to interact virtually with patients and families. While the rapid implementation of telehealth has been examined in other clinical contexts, limited research has studied the impact of the pandemic on palliative care delivery. This study examined the experiences clinicians faced when providing palliative care to older adult patients during the pandemic. Between April 2021 and March 2022, we interviewed 29 geriatricians and palliative care specialists from 11 institutions across the US. We asked clinicians about their experiences with palliative care during the pandemic, including challenges and opportunities related to the changing nature of palliative care delivery. We analyzed interviews using reflexive thematic analysis. The following three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) Clinicians’ challenges adjusting to virtual care; (2) System-level barriers, restrictions, and uncertainties about Covid-19; and (3) Older adult patients’ context and vulnerability (i.e., loss of social engagement, isolation, loneliness, delayed access to care) that increased the complexity of their health conditions. In conclusion, clinicians’ experiences during the pandemic shed light on the evolution of palliative care delivery and the importance of preparing them for new care models that account for virtual delivery and that address the diverse needs of older adults that emerge during public health crises.

Objectives This study examined the relationships of low cognitive performance and sleep disorder with functional disabilities among older adults. Methods: NHANES 2011–2014 data on 3179 individuals [Mage=69.71] were analyzed. Functional domains included: activities of daily living (ADL), instrumental ADL (IADL) and leisure and social activities (LSA). Animal Fluency Test and the Digit Symbol Substitution Test assessed cognitive performance. Participants self-reported having physician-diagnosed sleep disorder. Results: Participants with both low cognitive performance and sleep disorder had 4- to 10-times greater odds for ADL, IADL, and LSA difficulties compared to the participants with no low cognitive performance/sleep disorder. Participants with only low cognitive performance and those with only sleep disorder were two to three times more likely to experience these difficulties. Discussion: Low cognitive performance and sleep disorder together or independently were associated with functional disabilities. Participants with both low cognitive performance and sleep disorder had higher odds of functional disabilities.