No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Three-dimensional (3D)-stacking technology and the memory-wall problem have popularized processingin-memory (PIM) concepts again, which offers the benefits of bandwidth and energy savings by offloading computations to functional units inside the memory. Several memory vendors have also started to integrate computation logics into the memory, such as Hybrid Memory Cube (HMC), the latest version of which supports up to 18 in-memory atomic instructions. Although industry prototypes have motivated studies for investigating efficient methods and architectures for PIM, researchers have not proposed a systematic way for identifying the benefits of instruction-level PIM offloading. As a result, compiler support for recognizing offloading candidates and utilizing instruction-level PIM offloading is unavailable. In this article, we analyze the advantages of instruction-level PIM offloading in the context of HMC-atomic instructions for graphcomputing applications and propose CAIRO, a compiler-assisted technique and decision model for enabling instruction-level offloading of PIM without any burden on programmers. To develop CAIRO, we analyzed how instruction offloading enables performance gain in both CPU and GPU workloads. Our studies show that performance gain from bandwidth savings, the ratio of number of cache misses to total cache accesses, and the overhead of host atomic instructions are the key factors in selecting an offloading candidate. Based on our analytical models, we characterize the properties of beneficial and nonbeneficial candidates for offloading. We evaluate CAIRO with 27 multithreaded CPU and 36 GPU benchmarks. In our evaluation, CAIRO not only doubles the speedup for a set of PIM-beneficial workloads by exploiting HMC-atomic instructions but also prevents slowdown caused by incorrect offloading decisions for other workloads. CCS Concepts: • Hardware → 3D integrated circuits; Emerging architectures; Memory and dense storage; • Software and its engineering → Compilers;

In this paper we introduce LDBC Graphalytics, a new industrial-grade benchmark for graph analysis platforms. It consists of six deterministic algorithms, standard datasets, synthetic dataset generators, and reference output, that enable the objective comparison of graph analysis platforms. Its test harness produces deep metrics that quantify multiple kinds of system scalability, such as horizontal/vertical and weak/strong, and of robustness, such as failures and performance variability. The benchmark comes with open-source software for generating data and monitoring performance. We describe and analyze six implementations of the benchmark (three from the community, three from the industry), providing insights into the strengths and weaknesses of the platforms. Key to our contribution, vendors perform the tuning and benchmarking of their platforms.