Authors' Contributions 1.JF -Substantial contributions to acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, drafting the work, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 2.AO -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 3.TP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 4.SW -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, analysis and interpretation of data, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 5.AL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 6.NL -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 7.AB -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 8.RP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 9.LK -Substantial revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 10.SG -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 11.IP -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 12.IQ -Substantial contributions to revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work. 13.RJ -Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work, revising it critically for important intellectual content, final approval of the version to be published and agreement to be accountable ...

Purpose: Pediatric DMGs are highly malignant tumors with poor clinical outcomes. Over 70% of DMG patients harbor the histone 3 p.K27M (H3K27M) mutation, which correlates with a poorer clinical outcome, and is also used as a criterion for enrollment in clinical trials. Because complete surgical resection of DMG is not an option, biopsy at presentation is feasible, but re-biopsy at time of progression is rare. While imaging and clinical-based disease monitoring is the standard of care, molecular-based longitudinal characterization of these tumors is almost non-existent. To overcome these hurdles we examined if liquid biopsy allows measurement of disease response to precision therapy. Experimental Design: We established a sensitive and specific methodology which detects major driver mutations associated with pediatric DMGs using droplet digital PCR (n=48 subjects, n=110 specimens). Quantification of ctDNA for H3K27M was used for longitudinal assessment of disease response compared to centrally reviewed MRI data. Results: H3K27M was identified in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and plasma in 88% of patients with DMG, with CSF being the most enriched for ctDNA. We demonstrated the feasibility of multiplexing for detection of H3K27M, and additional driver mutations in patient’s tumor and matched CSF, maximizing the utility of a single source of liquid biome. A significant decrease in H3K27M plasma ctDNA agreed with MRI assessment of tumor response to radiotherapy in 83% (10/12) of patients. Conclusions: Our liquid biopsy approach provides a molecularly-based tool for tumor characterization, and is the first to indicate clinical utility of ctDNA for longitudinal surveillance of DMGs.

Bevacizumab-based therapy is successful at inducing rapid LGG response. Patients progressing off-therapy may be successfully re-treated with bevacizumab. Nearly all tumors progress once treatment is discontinued. Toxicities are not insignificant but usually reversible.