No abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi maha­siswa sesudah mengikuti perkuliahan yang menerapkan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup. Jenis penelitian ini adalah quasi eksperimen dengan pendekatan kuantitatif. Sampel penelitian adalah 38 mahasiswa angkatan 2016/2017 Prodi Pendidikan Matematika UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya. Instrumen yang digu­nakan adalah lembar tes kemampuan argumentasi. Kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa diiden­tifikasi berdasarkan komponen argumentasi McNeill dan Krajcik yang terdiri dari claim, evidence, reasoning, dan rebuttal. Peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa dianalisis dengan statistik non parametrik menggunakan uji Wilcoxon Signed-Rank pada taraf signifikan 5% (α = 0,05). Hasil analisis data menunjukkan bahwa kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa setelah perlakuan lebih baik dibandingkan sebelum perlakuan dan terdapat perbedaan signi­fikan (Z = -7,397, p = 0,000) kemampuan argumentasi mahasiswa sebelum dan setelah diterap­kan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup. Dengan demikian, penerapan model berpikir induktif dengan metode probing-prompting learning pada materi subgrup efektif untuk meningkatkan kemampuan argumen­tasi maha­siswa. Students’ argumentation ability through inductive thinking model with the probing-prompting learning methodAbstractThis study aimed to describe an increase in students' argumentative abilities after attending lectures that apply inductive thinking models with probing-prompting learning methods in subgroup material. This type of research was quasi-experimental with a quantitative approach. The study sample was 38 students of Mathematics Education Department of State Islamic University Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia. The instrument used was the argumentation ability test sheet. The student's argumentation ability was identified based on McNeill and Krajcik's argumentation component consisting of claims, evidence, reasoning, and rebuttal. Improved student argumentation skills were analyzed by non-parametric statistics using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank test. The results of data analysis showed that the students’ argumen­tation ability after treatment was better than before treatment and there was a significant difference (Z = -7,397, p = 0,000) the ability of students' argumentation before and after the inductive thinking model with the probing-prompting learning method was applied in the subgroup material. Thus, the implementation of inductive thinking models with probing-prompting learning methods in subgroup material was effective for improving students' argu­men­tation abilities.

This study aims to describe the planning, implementation, learning outcomes, and responses of students in the process of learning mathematics using Blended Learning based on the Merdeka Curriculum. This research is a case study research with a qualitative and quantitative approach. The research subjects were 36 of 10th-grade students at SMAN 3 Sidoarjo as one of the Sekolah Penggerak in East Java. Data collection techniques using documentation, interviews, observations, tests, and questionnaires. The results showed that the implementation of Blended Learning at the planning stage was in the very good category, the implementation stage was in the very good category, student learning outcomes were in the sufficient category, and student responses were in the high category.

To describe mental computation strategies of the dyslexic student in performing the addition and subtraction of 1-digit and 2-digit integer. Mental computation is a process of doing arithmetic calculations without using other tools. This strategy will help dyslexic students find more accurate and flexible solution while solving the arithmetic problem because it can minimize their weaknesses in terms of reading and writing. This research uses the qualitative approach. Data were collected by using a task-based interview for two dyslexic students. The results of this study indicate that dyslexic students use the spin-around strategy to solve the addition for the 1-digit number and the working from the right and from the left strategies to solve the addition for the 2-digit number. Meanwhile, to solve the subtraction problem, dyslexic students use think addition and counting back strategies for the 1-digit number and Working from The Right strategy for the 2-digit number.

Mathematics is a basic science that not only teaches numbers, but in the learning process also trains logical, analytical, systematic and critical thinking ability that useful to whet intellectual. Mathematics can also be a means of instilling Islamic values to students early on to whet their spiritual intelligence in amid the rapid development of the times which leaves the negative impact that is moral decadence. Therefore the aim of this study was to determine how the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the mathematics learning sets by entering the Islamic values in the subject matter of integers at fourth grade MI Mambaul Ulum Terik Krian Sidoarjo. This type of research is the development research using 4-D models of Thiagarajan which consists of four stages which are limited to the stage of develop (development). The results showed that the learning sets are valid, practical and effective. The validity of RPP at 3.93, the validity of textbooks at 3.65, and the validity of LKS at 3.73. The learning sets meets the criteria of practical learning with an average of 3. While the effectiveness criteria are met due to the activity of teachers at 3.36, active student activities as much as 63.33%, mastery learning students by 77.78%, and the positive response of students at 80.56 %.