The Bermudagrass Hay Summit is an in-state Extension workshop that began in 2017. The objective of this workshop has been to provide recent updates and advanced information to bermudagrass hay producers in Northern Alabama. Topics have included insect pests, weed control, soil nutrients, and hay storage techniques. In 2021, organizers of the meeting were left with the conundrum of canceling the event or converting the event into a virtual-only platform as current Alabama Cooperative Extension guidelines would not allow an in-person meeting. As a result of deciding to convert the meeting to a virtual format, the organizers broaden the promotion of the event. The meeting was a 6-hour workshop with multiple speakers. The videoconferencing software Zoom (Zoom Video Communications, Inc., San Jose, CA) was used to register and deliver the workshop. The workshop was advertised on social media, through an Extension communications press release, email blasts, and word of mouth. All presentations were delivered remotely from different locations across Alabama. To ensure technology problems could be resolved quickly, an Extension information technology specialist participated in the videoconference, as well as a graduate student to communicate any chat questions/discussions from participants and assist individual participants as necessary. There were 129 people registered for the meeting, a 1,075% increase over the average from the four previous years (12 participants). Of those registered, 26% were out of state and 1 participant was out of the US. Even though the platform was virtual, the overall satisfaction of the meeting did not change in 2021 (4.7 on a 5-point scale) compared with 2020 (4.8 on a 5-point scale). While it is important to continue in-person and one-on-one interactions in Extension, the ability to provide virtual or hybrid events will allow Extension agents to be relevant to a broader audience, as well as inform potential clients of Extension’s mission.

Warm-season perennial pastures are the base of livestock production systems in lower Alabama. To overcome the shortage in forage production during the late fall and winter months, during bahiagrass dormancy, overseeding pastures with cool-season annuals can be used as an option for providing forage during this period. Diverse forage mixtures of multiple species and functional groups have gained popularity in use among forage-livestock producers, but few evaluations have been conducted in overseeded sods. The objective of the study was to evaluate forage mass and nutritive value of cool-season forage mixtures overseeded into bahiagrass pastures. Six, 0.40-ha paddocks of ‘Pensacola’ bahiagrass were overseeded with one of three cool-season forage mixtures (n = 2 paddocks/treatment) on November2, 2021: 1) oat (Avena sativa), wheat (Triticum aestivum), and balansa (Trifolium michelianum), red (Trifolium pratense), and white clover (Trifolium repens; ‘clovers’); 2) oat, cereal rye (Secale cereale), and clovers; and 3) cereal rye, annual ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), and clovers. When forage mixtures reached a target grazing height of 20 cm, paddocks were managed using flash mob stocking with beef cow-calf pairs to graze to a target height of0 cm. Herbage mass, nutritive value, botanical composition and height samples were collected pre- and post-grazing events. There was no treatment (P = 0.240) or treatment × harvest (P = 0.4239) effect on forage mass. Harvest date affected (P = 0.029) forage mass, with greater forage mass at late harvest (1,903.33 kg DM·ha-1) than at early (1,253.33 kg DM·ha-1) in the growing season. There were no treatment effects observed for species components (P > 0.05), although grasses dominated the forage mixtures with an average of 80% grass presence. Legume establishment was poor (less than%) and the remaining species composition consisted of weed species (19%). There was a treatment effect (P = 0.003) on CP, where oat-rye-clovers had the greatest CP and rye-ryegrass-clover had the least CP. Oat-wheat-clover mixtures had greater TDN (79.2%), less NDF (39.8%), and ADF (18.7%) than cereal rye-ryegrass-clover (75.4%, 46.1%, and 22.2% for TDN, NDF, and ADF, respectively), but did not differ from oat-cereal rye-clover mixtures (76.6%, 45.7%, 21.0% for TDN, NDF, and ADF, respectively). In year of this study, overseeding bahiagrass supported forage production over a 2-month period and can be a management tool used to reduce the need for supplementing in the dormancy periods of warm season perennial grasses.

The backgrounding period is a post-weaning management strategy to add weight and build the health status in beef calves. This phase is used to prepare beef calves to enter the next phase of the production supply chain. Weaning and backgrounding management methods can be strategies to reduce calf morbidity and mortality in the feedlot. The objective of this study was to assess beef calf growth performance based on weaning management strategy and subsequent backgrounding using commonly used forage-based diets by Alabama beef producers. A two-year study was conducted using 427 steers (n = 216, year 1, average BW 306kg; n = 213, year 2, average BW 294kg). Steer calves from three Auburn University research farms were randomly assigned based on weaning weights to one of three different weaning method groups: fenceline weaning, nose-flap weaning, or abrupt weaning. After the weaning period calves were brought to a centralized farm and began a 60-d backgrounding period where they were randomized according to previous weaning management, farm of origin and body weight to one of three nutritional management strategies in a 3×3 factorial design: cool-season baleage (oats, ryegrass and crimson clover) and 1% BW dried distillers’ grains (DDGS), bermudagrass hay and 1% BW DDGS, or grazing mixed warm-season annuals and 1% BW DDGS. Body weights were collected on d 0, 30 and 60 of the backgrounding phase. In both years, fenceline weaned calves had the greatest average daily gain (year 1, 0.76 kg/d; year 2, 1.03 kg/d; P = 0.0225) in the first 30 days of the backgrounding period regardless of backgrounding diet type. Calves fed the bermudagrass hay-based diet also had a greater average daily (year 1, 0.78 kg/d; year 2, 1.24 kg/d; P < 0.0001) than both the grazing and baleage diet groups in the first 30 days of backgrounding. From d 30 to 60 of backgrounding in each year, calves on the hay-based diet had the least average daily gain (year 1, 0.19 kg/d; year 2, 0.42 kg/d; P < 0.0001). Steers on both the warm-season annual grazing and cool-season baleage diets supported greater average daily gains (P =0.0041) during the last 30 days of the backgrounding period (0.74 kg/d and 0.75 kg/d, respectively). Steers in year 2 had a greater total gain (year 1, 45.55kg; year 2, 51.56 kg; P = 0.0042) than steers in year 1. However, results in both years indicate that weaning and backgrounding management strategies may influence calf performance during the transition period into the post-weaning phase.

The beef calf weaning period is a time of transition in the cow-calf production cycle and can be one of the most stressful stages in the life of a beef calf. This transition can have a major impact on both calf short- and long-term health, growth performance and economic returns. There are several different weaning management strategies cattle producers can use in this transition period. The objective of this study was to assess the effects of weaning management practices on beef calf performance and health before backgrounding. A two-year study was conducted using 427 steer calves (216 year 1, average BW 297 kg; 213 year 2, average BW 291 kg) from three Auburn University research farms were randomly assigned based on weaning weight to one of three different weaning method groups for a 14-day observation period: fenceline, nose-flap, or abrupt weaning. On day 0, all calves assigned to the abrupt weaning group traveled 3 hours to one central location. Calves in the fenceline and nose-flap groups traveled to the same location on day 14 of study. Calves were weighed on day 0, day 14 and 24 hours following any travel event. Blood samples were also collected to determine haptoglobin concentrations surrounding the travels events and blood titers following vaccinations. In both years of the study, fenceline weaned calves had the greatest average daily gain at 1.08 kg/d (P < 0.0001) and abruptly weaned calves had the least average daily gain, losing 0.15 kg/d during the 14-d observation period. In Year 1, steers had a significantly greater (P < 0.0001) gain across all treatments than calves in Year 2, with Year 1 calves gaining 7.72 kg more during the weaning period than Year 2 calves. Over both years of the study, fenceline weaned calves gained more (P =0.0008) than both nose-flap and abruptly weaned calves. In Year, abruptly weaned calves had greater blood concentrations of haptoglobin (0.084mg/mL; P < 0.0001) than both the fenceline and noseflap weaned calves (0.023mg/mL; 0.020mg/mL). This data demonstrates how weaning management strategies may influence calf growth performance and the transition into the post-weaning period.

Weaning is one of the most critical and stressful stages of a beef calf’s life. Management strategies practiced during the post-weaning period can have a large impact on calf performance, quality, and economic viability. With the number of different practices that producers can utilize during these stages of production, it is important for Extension educators to understand which management strategies are most commonly used and the potential successes of those practices. In spring 2022, an online survey was conducted to examine beef calf weaning and backgrounding management practices used by Alabama cattle producers. The survey was distributed through Qualtrics software and contained 24 total questions. There were 214 responses received by the end of the survey deadline. A total of 94% of respondents considered their operation to be a cow-calf operation with 52% of respondents identifying as a commercial cow-calf operation. Most participants (46%) indicated they had a smaller size herd of 50 head or less. Almost one-half of respondents (47%) had a calving season in the fall, 23% had a winter calving season, and 19% had a spring calving season. There was an 11% response of producers not having a defined calving season. Participants were asked to describe their method of calf weaning and of the methods listed, 55% said they abruptly wean and 38% reported that they utilize fenceline weaning. Over one-half (61%) of producers indicated that they background or precondition their calves and another 25% stated that they do in some years, but not always. For respondents that do not background, market unpredictability is the main concern when choosing to not precondition calves. Producers who responded that they do background calves indicated that they wean for at least 60 days before sale. These respondents also followed other important management strategies such as a vaccination program (83%), castration (81%) and use of implants (37%). Methods for marketing backgrounded calves differed across respondents with 49% of survey respondents using local livestock auctions as one method of selling their calves and 13% of producers retaining ownership of their calves through the feedyard finishing phase. With these data, potential educational gaps for cow-calf operations, such as marketing knowledge and opportunities have been identified. Extension educators in Alabama will be able to use these data to create resources and programs centered around backgrounding cattle to improve overall understanding related to calf management post-weaning.