Coarse chop partially deodorized tomato puree was spiked with 1 to 3 levels of individual food‐grade volatiles, reported to contribute to tomato flavor or volatile mixes and presented to a trained descriptive panel for flavor analysis in 2 different years. Six to eight panelists rated 9 aroma, 8 taste, and 1 aftertaste descriptors on a 15‐cm unstructured line scale. Panelists detected significant differences (P ≤ 0.15) in concentration for various individual aroma compounds for a range of descriptors. Various descriptors also had correlations with levels of individual volatiles, including acetaldehyde, linalool, citral, trans‐2‐trans‐4‐decadienal, furaneol, 1‐octen‐3‐one, and benzaldehyde. Of the combined volatile mixes in either year 2000 or 2001, spiked levels of the “green” mix (including with isobutylthiazole) resulted in increased perception of overall green and vine aromas as well as decreased perception of floral aroma, sweet taste, and overall aftertaste. The “earthy” mix resulted in increased perception of vine, earthy, and musty aromas as well as sweet taste, and decreased perception of overall and sour tastes. The “fruity” mix increased perception of overall, sweet tomato, tropical, and floral aromas as well as sweet, tropical, fruity, and overall aftertastes. The “fruity” mix also decreased green and musty aromas as well as sour and ripe tomato tastes. Principle component analysis (PCA) revealed that spiking with “earthy” and “green” mixes and 1‐penten‐3‐one were drivers for high loadings on the earthy and green descriptors, whereas the “fruity” mixes, furaneol, β‐ionone, benzaldehyde, and 2‐phenylethanol were drivers for high loadings on sweet tomato and floral aromas.
SUMMARY— The food preferences of approximately 50,000 college students representing 1% of the college enrollment in the United Stares during the 1966‐1967 school year were analyzed. The responses were collected on a regional basis, subdivided as to sex and were reported as national and regional totals. Two hundred and seven food items were surveyed. Foods were ranked in terms of percent Liked, Disliked and Do Not Know. Median and percentile groupings for each food class, as well as for all foods, were calculated. The relationships between food preferences and nutritional values of foods were examined. The percent of the recommended dietary allowance provided by one serving of a given food item was calculated for vitamin A, vitamin C, calcium and iron. The results indicated that if food preferences were the sole determinant of food intake, then the dietary intake would be low in vitamin A. In fact, the best sources of vitamin A were among the most disliked foods in the entire survey. The relationship between food preferences and possible vitamin C and calcium deficiencies was not clear‐cut Except for liver, one of the best sources of dietary iron, there was little evidence that food preferences discriminated against foods containing significant amounts of iron.
Baguettes, cinnamon rolls, and chocolate chip cookies containing 0, 12.5% or 25% distillers' dried grains with solubles (DDGS) from soft white winter wheat substituted for flour (w/w) were evaluated by an experienced panel to determine how much DDGS could successfully be incorporated into baked products. Panelists were unable to differentiate control cookies from those containing 12.5% DDGS. Attribute analyses of seven flavor and four texture traits were conducted, and overall acceptability was determined for products found to be different in their sensory properties. Both the control and experimental cinnamon rolls and chocolate chip cookies were rated as highly acceptable. The baguettes containing DDGS were found to be less acceptable than the control because of a stronger flavor and/or off-flavor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.