The authors reviewed 58 patients with EEG-confirmed idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE). When initially seen, 17 (29%) were on broad-spectrum (adequate) antiepileptic drugs (AED) only, 28 (48%) on ill-advised AED only, and 13 (22%) on a combination of both. Thus, a majority of patients with IGE initially receive ill-advised AED, which cause IGE to appear intractable.

Patients with epilepsy may not always be able to identify their seizures. Epilepsy management relies on patient reporting to validate whether seizures occur during treatment. The goal of this study was to assess the frequency of unreported seizures recorded during routine outpatient ambulatory EEG recording. The authors reviewed 552 records from 502 patients who underwent outpatient 16-channel computer-assisted ambulatory EEG monitoring (CAA-EEG). Seizure identification was evaluated by assessing push-button activation. Partial seizures were seen most commonly. A total of 47 of 552 records (8.5%) had partial seizures recorded on CAA-EEG, with 29 of 47 (61.7%) with electroclinical seizures identified by push-button activation. Seizures on EEG without push-button activation were analyzed separately and compared with a self-reported written diary to verify lack of recognition. A total of 18 of 47 records (38.3%) had some partial seizures that were unrecognized by the patient, and 11 of 47 records (23.4%) had seizures recognized only by the computer. The authors conclude that patients frequently have seizures outside of the hospital that go unrecognized. Underreporting of seizure frequency occurs in the outpatient setting and impacts optimal diagnosis and treatment for patients with epilepsy.

No abstract

Metallic devices generally represent a contra-indication for MRI scanning. Based on laboratory testing, the neuro cybernetic prosthesis (NCP) is labelled MRI compatible when used with a send and receive head coil. However, there are no published clinical data to support the safety of brain MRI in patients with the NCP. Our objective was to report clinical experience with such a population. We questioned 40 centres that had implanted the NCP system as of 10/1/99. If MRI had been performed on any vagus nerve stimulator patients, we collected information on these patients, the MRI technique used, any events noted during the scan, including both subjective reports (by the patient ), and observable (objective) changes noted by the staff. Twelve centres (30%) responded. Over a time period of 3 years, there were a total of 27 MRI scans performed in 25 patients. All scanners were 1.5 T. A head coil was used in 26 scans, and a body coil in one. The indications for the scans were diverse. Seven were related to the epilepsy, including aetiology or pre-surgical evaluation. Others were unrelated, including brain tumours, cerebral haematoma, vasculitis, headaches, and head trauma. Three scans were performed with the stimulator on, while 24 were performed with the stimulator off. One patient had a mild objective voice change for several minutes. No other objective changes were noted in any of the patients. One 11-year old reported chest pain while experiencing severe claustrophobia. Twenty-five patients denied any discomfort around the lead or the generator. We conclude that this clinical series supports the safety of routine brain MRI using a send and receive head coil in patients implanted with the NCP System.