Background and Objectives: Umbilical cord blood (UCB) contains haematopoietic stem cells and can be used as an alternative to bone marrow transplantation in certain cases. Engraftment was dependent upon the haematopoietic progenitor cell content of the cord blood units. This study was designed to investigate the influence of obstetric, neonatal and collection factors on the volume and haematopoietic content of UCB donations. Material and Methods: A retrospective analysis of obstetric and neonatal factors was performed from 300 cord blood donations in Valencia Cord Blood Bank. Maternal, neonatal and collection factors influencing cord blood quality measured as volume, total nucleated cell count, CD34+ cells and colony-forming units (CFU) were analysed. Results: Bigger babies produced cord blood units with larger volume, higher cells counts, CFU and CD34 cell counts. In the multivariate analysis, we found that both placental weight and mode of collection were predictor variables for total nucleated cell count, CD34 cells and CFU. Conclusion: Our study concludes that cord blood units must be collected before placental delivery and that birth weight, as an estimation of the placental weight, could be added to standard cord blood donors criteria in order to improve the bank efficiency.

Summary:The use of cord blood (CB) for transplantation has increased greatly in recent years. The collection strategy is the first step in collecting good-quality CB units. There are two main techniques for collecting CB from the umbilical vein: in the delivery room while the placenta is still in the uterus by midwives and obstetricians or in an adjacent room after placental delivery by CB bank trained personnel. In this study, the benefits and disadvantages between the two different CB collection strategies were evaluated, in order to improve CB bank methodology. Valencia CB bank maintains the two different collection strategies. CB was obtained from 569 vaginal and 70 caesarean deliveries and obstetrical and clinical charts were reviewed. Before processing CB units, volume was calculated and samples were drawn for cell counts. After processing and before cryopreservation samples were drawn for cell counts, CD34+cell analysis, viability, clonogenic assays and microbiology were drawn directly from the bags. We compared the efficiency of the two collection techniques. Obstetric data and umbilical CB were obtained from 569 vaginal (264 collected in utero and 305 collected ex utero) and 70 caesarean deliveries. The proportion of excluded CB units before processing was 33% for vaginal ex utero, 25% for vaginal in utero and 46% for caesarean deliveries. Differences were statistically significant. For vaginal deliveries a larger volume and a higher number of nucleated cells, percentage of CD34+ cells and colony-forming units (CFUs) were harvested in the in utero collection group. There was no statistical difference between CB collected after placental expulsion from vaginal and caesarean deliveries. Comparison between all vaginal and caesarean deliveries did not show any difference. We conclude that the mode of collection influences the haematopoietic content of CB donations. Collection before placental delivery is the best approach to CB collection and allows optimisation of CB bank methodology. Caesarean deliveries seem to contain similar progenitor content to vaginal deliveries.

No abstract

Our study shows that maternal medical histories must be completely reviewed by medical staff before collection of the UCB. Obstetrical factors influence cell content of UCB and could be added to standard cord blood donor criteria in order to improve the bank efficiency.

These preliminary results show the fast hematopoietic recovery and the low infectious and hemorrhagic morbidity associated with the procedure and strongly suggest that ABSCT may be as effective as autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT) in AML. However, further strategies for reducing leukemic relapse must still be investigated.