Objectives: This study was designed to explore how guided reflective writing could evoke empathy and reflection in a group of practicing physicians. Methods: Total participants recruited included 40 staff physicians at Cleveland Clinic, a tertiary care academic medical center. Twenty physicians (intervention group) were assigned to participate in a 6-session faculty development program introducing narrative medicine and engaging in guided reflective writing. Ten physicians (comparison group 1) received the assigned course reading materials but did not participate in the course sessions. Ten physicians (comparison group 2) neither received the reading materials nor participated in the sessions. Qualitative analysis of the physicians' reflective writings was performed to identify major themes. The Jefferson Scale of Empathy was administered three times during the course. Results: Qualitative analysis of physicians' writings showed themes of both compassionate solidarity and detached concern. Exploration of negative emotions occurred more frequently than positive ones. The most common writing style was case presentation. A total of 36 staff physicians completed the Jefferson Scale of Empathy. Results of statistical analysis suggested an improvement in empathy in the intervention group at the end of the course (p < 0 .05). Conclusions: These results suggest a faculty development program using guided narrative writing can promote reflection and may enhance empathy among practicing physicians. These findings should encourage medical educators to design additional strategies for enhancing reflection and empathic behavior in trainees and specifically practicing physicians who can role model these behaviors to achieve the ultimate goal of improving the quality of patient care
Investigated the effect of 3 classes of variables (preschool cognitive functioning, preschool social-emotional functioning, and background-demographic variables) on early elementary school achievement. 209 black and white boys from lower- and middle-class backgrounds were evaluated during the preschool period and received achievement tests during the 2nd yr of elementary school. Each of the 3 classes of variables accounted for a significant proportion of the variance of the criterion measures (e.g., Kohn Social Competence Scale, Kohn Problem Checklist, Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale, and the Metropolitan Achievement Test). When the classes of variables were examined using a hierarchical regression technique, the social-emotional and cognitive variables yielded the most information for programs of psychological intervention. Intervention directed at the social-emotional components of cognitive performance is discussed. (20 ref)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.