No abstract

Paddy herbicides contribute to the reduction of weeding labor, however, there are concerns about their effects on the environment and ecosystems.The environmental burden of applied herbicides is heaviest in water systems such as irrigation channels and rivers. Herbicides are generally detected in rivers in concentrations in levels of ng/L for only 2 to 3 months after use. It is to be regretted that herbicides have been implicated in accidents involving fish, the impeded propagation of algae and other non-target organisms. Therefore, it is necessary to assess the ecological risk, and the Environment Agency in Japan compiled an interim report on how pesticides' ecological effects should be assessed. Pesticides are separately examined for their toxicity (hazard assessment) and exposure (exposure analysis). However, to the environment and ecosystems there are many problems in assessing the ecological risk of pesticides, such as selection of geographic locations, methodology of assessing the impacts on ecosystems and monitoring the effect of pesticides. New herbicides are expected to have high selectivity and low toxicity. Decreasing herbicide toxicity requires high selectivity to distinguish target weeds from crops and non-target organisms. New groups of compounds will be developed based on a biorational approach. Moreover, it is necessary to develop an environmentally low-impact application method such as the use of granular types and sustainedrelease formulation among others. It is important that integrated methods be used to control paddy weeds by combining ecological/agronomical, mechanical and biological control methods, instead of relying solely on chemical herbicides.

The performance of a commercially available microtiter plate ELISA kit for the determination of the neonicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid was evaluated for sensitivity, selectivity, influence of organic solvent used for extraction procedure, matrix interference originated from agricultural sample, accuracy, and method comparison with conventional HPLC analysis. The limit of detection for the kit (0.1 or 0.5 ng/mL) was determined. The working range (1-39 ng/mL) experimentally calculated on the basis of a criterion, which is determined as the range from I(20) to I(80), was comparable to that established by the manufacturer (1-50 ng/mL). The linearity of the standard curve based on the kit-assembled standard solutions agreed with the one based on the self-made standard solutions. Specificity studies indicate that the imidacloprid monoclonal antibody can readily distinguish the target compound from other structurally related neonicotinoid analogues and some metabolites, with the exception of clothianidin, the cross-reactivity of which was approximately 12%. To extract imidacloprid from an agricultural sample (apple) as simply and rapidly as possible, some extraction methods were examined. Consequently, the extraction method with hand-shaking for 5 min was the best among the examined methods. For the analysis of imidacloprid in apple samples, it was extracted directly with methanol and the extracts were diluted 10-fold (100-fold in the well) with water prior to ELISA analysis. No significant matrix interference was observed with the dilution factor. Recoveries of imidacloprid from fortified apple samples ranged from 87.7 to 112.0%. The results obtained with the ELISA kit correlated well with those by the reference method (conventional HPLC analysis) for apple samples (r > 0.998). These findings strongly indicate that the ELISA kit may be employed routinely for an on-site imidacloprid residue analysis of apple samples.

No abstract

No abstract