Using standardized success criteria and statistical methods that applied guidelines for survival analysis conclusions were drawn. Excellent results are achievable by all forms of urethroplasty, justifying a more liberal indication for urethral reconstruction.
Patients consider the outcome of surgery for urethral strictures differently than physicians. The outcome of urethroplasty should be assessed not only by objective, but also by subjective criteria. Patients need appropriate preoperative counseling. With realistic expectations most men are satisfied with surgery for urethral stricture.
Patients consider the outcome of surgery for urethral strictures differently than physicians. The outcome of urethroplasty should be assessed not only by objective, but also by subjective criteria. Patients need appropriate preoperative counseling. With realistic expectations most men are satisfied with surgery for urethral stricture.
PurposeTo assess the effectiveness of low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer and to compare the outcome with predictions from Kattan and Partin nomograms at 60 months after seed implantation.Material and methodsOne thousand, one hundred and eighty-seven patients with localized prostate cancer at low-, intermediate-, or high-risk of progression received LDR brachytherapy using iodine-125 seeds with curative intent, applied as monotherapy or in combination with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), and/or androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). At 60 months after seed implantation, data of 1,064 patients (1,058 alive + 6 who died of prostate cancer) were analyzed for biochemical progression-free survival (bPFS) based on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels using the Phoenix definition. Five-year bPFS probabilities were determined for various risk group classifications (d’Amico, Mt. Sinai, MSKCC/Seattle, NCCN). Outcomes were also compared to patient-individualized nomogram predictions of 5-year bPFS (Kattan 2002) and probability of organ-confined disease (Kattan 2002, Partin 2007).ResultsOverall, 93.3% (993/1,064) of the patients were free of biochemical progression within 5 years, while the average 5-year bPFS probability according to the Kattan nomogram was significantly lower (85%, p < 0.001). Outcomes were significantly better than Kattan nomogram predictions in the subgroup of patients with monotherapy as well as in patients additionally treated with EBRT. Comparison of the overall outcome with nomogram predictions for organ-confined disease (Kattan nomogram: 50%; Partin nomogram: 65%) revealed a significant probability of LDR brachytherapy to destroy periprostatic tumor spread (p < 0.001) in all risk group constellations, even in high-risk patients.ConclusionsThe results indicate high effectiveness of LDR brachytherapy in all risk groups, significantly better than predicted with the Kattan nomogram in most subgroups. The significant superiority of LDR brachytherapy compared to nomogram predictions of organ-confined disease suggests that LDR brachytherapy effectively controls both intra- and periprostatic disease.
In patients with suspected sarcoidosis histological confirmation is generally desired. In 40 patients with the ultimate diagnosis of sarcoidosis transbronchial lung biopsy during fiberoptic bronchoscopy revealed in 83% noncaseating granulomas. With 5 biopsies per patient a positive result was obtained in 20 of 25 patients (80%) with radiographic stage I disease, in 6 of 7 (85%) with stage II disease and in 7 of 8 (87%) with stage III disease. The only complications were two small pneumothoraces and two hemorrhages. Transbronchial biopsy with its low morbidity and high diagnostic yield can be recommended as an initial procedure in diagnosing sarcoidosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.