6516 Background: Monalizumab is a first-in-class immune checkpoint inhibitor targeting Natural Killer Group 2A (NKG2A), which is expressed on subsets of Natural Killer (NK), gd T and tumor-infiltrating CD8+T cells. NKG2A blockade promotes innate anti-tumor immunity mediated by NK and CD8+T cells and enhances NK cell antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity induced by cetuximab. In a Phase I study, the combination of monalizumab and cetuximab was well tolerated. In an initial expansion cohort 1 of 40 patients (pts) who had progressed after platinum-based therapy, we reported an overall response rate (ORR) of 27.5%, a 4.5 month median PFS and an 8.5 month median OS. In a subset of patients (n=18) previously treated with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (IO), corresponding results were 17%, 5.1, and 14.1 months, respectively (ESMO 2019). Here we present data from a second expansion cohort 2 (n=40) conducted specifically in the post-IO setting to independently confirm the cohort 1 results. Methods: Eligible patients had R/M SCCHN previously treated with platinum and a PD-(L)1 inhibitor. Pts received monalizumab 750 mg q2weeks and cetuximab according to the label until progression or toxicity. Cohort 2 was designed as a confirmatory multicenter single arm phase II study, with a pre-planned total of 40 patients. The primary endpoint was ORR assessed per RECIST 1.1. Results: As of January 31, 2020, 40 pts have been treated in cohort 2. Median follow-up is 7.3 months (range, 1.9-13.6+). Eight (8) pts have a confirmed partial response (PR); ORR is 20% [95% confidence interval: 11-35]. Median time to response is 1.6 months [1.6-5.3]. At the time of data analysis, 3 pts were still in PR and 3 pts had stable disease continue on treatment. PFS and OS are still immature. Conclusions: In pts previously treated with platinum and PD-(L)1 inhibitors, the combination of monalizumab and cetuximab demonstrated promising activity. The second extension cohort confirmed prospectively the ORR reported in cohort 1. A randomized phase III trial of monalizumab and cetuximab is planned in this platinum and IO-pretreated SCCHN population. Clinical trial information: NCT02643550 .

Background The rate of toxic deaths related to induction chemotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancers is unacceptable and calls into question this therapeutic strategy, which is however highly effective in terms of rate and speed of response. The purpose of the study was to investigate predictive factors of toxicity of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) in locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC). Methods Between June 2009 and December 2017, 113 patients treated consecutively with TPF were included retrospectively. Patients were receiving induction chemotherapy for either an inoperable cancer or laryngeal preservation. For inoperable cancer, induction chemotherapy was proposed to patients presenting either a large tumor with strong symptoms (dyspnea, dysphagia, pain) or a tumor with rapid progression. Risk factors were chosen among the initial patient and tumour characteristics and chemotherapy modalities. Results Eighty-nine patients (79%) were male; the median age was 58 years [32–71]. Sixty-nine (61%) patients were treated for inoperable cancer and 44 (39%) for laryngeal preservation. 45% had stage IVa cancer, 28% stage III and 25% stage IVb. Sixty percent of patients had a partial response after TPF, 22% had a complete response, 12% were stable, 5% were progressing, and 1% had a discordant response. Thirty-four patients (30%) received enteral feeding during induction chemotherapy with TPF. The possibility of oral feeding without a tube was predictive of a better response (p = 0.003). Seven (6%) patients died during TPF. There was an increased risk of death with preexisting liver dysfunction (liver dysmorphia on imaging or decrease prothrombin rate) (p = 0.032). There was an increased risk of grade ≥ 3 infection if an enteral feeding occurred during the period of induction chemotherapy (p = 0.03). Conclusions TPF induction chemotherapy had an 82% objective response rate with 6% toxic deaths. Nutritional status and the presence of hepatic dysfunction are significant risk factors to be taken into account in therapeutic decisions.

Objectives To determine the importance of nutritional status, social status, and inflammatory status in the prognosis of head and neck cancer. Study Design Single-center retrospective study of prospectively collected data. Setting Tertiary referral center. Methods Ninety-two consecutive patients newly diagnosed for cancer of the upper aerodigestive tract without metastases were assessed at time of diagnosis for several prognostic factors. Nutritional status was assessed by the nutritional risk index, social status by the EPICES score, and inflammatory status by the systemic inflammatory response index. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Results In multivariable analysis, the main prognostic factors were the TNM classification (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.34, P = .002, for stage T3-4), malnutrition as assessed by the nutritional risk index (HR = 3.64, P = .008, for severe malnutrition), and a systemic inflammatory response index score ≥1.6 (HR = 3.32, P = .02). Social deprivation was not a prognostic factor. Conclusion Prognosis in head and neck cancer is multifactorial; however, malnutrition and inflammation are important factors that are potentially reversible by early intervention.

Background To assess the impact of nutritional status on tolerance to induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5‐fluorouracil (ICT) in head and neck cancer (HNC). Methods Ninety‐two HNC patients were included. Toxicity was assessed according to common terminology criteria for adverse events. Nutritional status was assessed by body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, nutritional risk index (NRI), and CT scan (skeletal muscle mass index [SMI] at the first lumbar vertebral level). Results Before treatment, average BMI was 22.7 ± 4.6 kg/m2, serum albumin 38.7 ± 5.8 g/L, NRI 97.6 ± 10.6, and SMI 36.4 ± 7.9 cm2/m2. After treatment, BMI was 23 ± 4.5, serum albumin 30.2 ± 7.1, and NRI 88.1 ± 9.2. During ICT, 52 (62%) patients developed at least one toxicity ≥ Grade 3. Pre‐treatment SMI was the only predictive factor of toxicity irrespective of BMI (p = 0.04). Conclusion Low skeletal muscle mass is a predictive factor of toxicity to ICT in HNC.

Umbilical skin metastases (or Sister Mary Joseph nodules) are rare. Their presence typically indicates the late manifestation of deep-seated abdominopelvic malignancy. They occur mainly in gynecological cancers, and gastrointestinal cancers in men. The most common histology is adenocarcinoma (∼75% of cases), but it can also rarely be squamous cell or undifferentiated carcinoma. These metastases can be present at diagnosis or appear at disease recurrence, and are associated with a very poor prognosis with an average survival of 11 months. We report the clinical case of a 58-year-old man with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma and umbilical cutaneous metastasis after receiving first-line chemotherapy. The diagnosis was established upon liver biopsy in July 2019, after the patient presented with a complaint of transfixing abdominal pain. The first-line treatment consisted of six cycles of modified FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. However, in November 2019, computed tomography (CT) scan showed disease progression. Second-line treatment with gemcitabine (Gemzar®) led to a 16% decrease in target lesions. During the fourth cycle, three periumbilical indurated nodules appeared. After six cycles, skin infiltration had increased, and the patient reported his abdominal pain had intensified. Reassessment by CT scan showed an increase in both hepatic and peritoneal disease progression. Third-line treatment with FOLFIRI, started on April 15, 2020, could not control the disease, leading to greater induration and subcutaneous infiltration, which were responsible for the increased pain and ultimate death. Umbilical skin metastases are rare, and they are associated with advanced metastatic disease and a very poor prognosis. Cases reporting Sister Mary Joseph nodules are needed to better understand the conditions and mechanisms of their appearance and dissemination.