Water demand equations are estimated using the most current American Water Works Association (1984) survey of 430 (of 600 largest) U.S. utilities. The data set was augmented by monthly rainfall and temperature data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's climatological data. Demographic data were obtained from the U.S. Department of Commerce (1988). Besides the usual endogeneity problems involving block price structures this paper also examines the possible endogeneity of conservation and education programs. Three types of models were used: a marginal price model, an average price model, and Shin's (1985) price perception model. The results generally show that price elasticity is higher in the South and the West. Conservation does not appear to reduce water use, but public education appears to have reduced water usage in the West. The Shin (1985) tests in this study indicate that consumers react more to average than marginal prices in all regions. 1. INTRODUCTION In recent years, water policy officials, faced with growing water demands, have explicitly addressed demand management strategies. Rate structures have been infrequently used as a management tool, as opposed to the traditional methods of education and conservation programs. While the latter two strategies have been emphasized, pricing strategies have recently been receiving attention. The impact of all of these strategies must be examined in a simultaneous framework in any comprehensive demand management program. This paper has two main purposes. The first is to estimate urban water demand in the United States using the most current American Water Works Association (AWWA) [1984] survey of 430 (of 600 largest) U.S. utilities. It is essential to use the most recent data since customers may be responding differently to higher rates than in the past. The most recent studies [e.g., Williams, 1985] rely on the A WWA [1970] survey. This water demand model will explicitly incorporate the impact of conservation programs, something few other studies have done. The second purpose is to test if consumers respond to average prices (AP) or marginal prices (MP) using Shin's [1985] model. Section 2 reviews some of the water demand estimation issues in the literature. Section 3 discusses the data used in this study. Section 4 presents the models used in this study, in particular, a price perception model [Shin, 1985]. Section 5 analyzes the results. Section 6 concludes the paper. 2. WATER DEMAND ESTIMATION ISSUES Although it is essential to understand the key determinants of water usage [Hirshleifer et al., 1960], a consensus on the proper estimation methodology has not been reached. Early water studies ignored block rates by using an average price [Gottlieb, 1963; Young, 1973; Foster and Beattie, 1979]. Later, Nordin [1976] modified Taylor's [1975] specification to include a marginal price and a difference variable to account for the effects of inframarginal rates and fixed fees. Lately, some researchers have implemented Nordin's theo-Copyright !992 b...
This article tests for convergence of freedom using Freedom House's (2002) indices of political rights and civil liberties in 136 countries from 1972 to 2001. Time‐series tests, using structural breaks, are employed to test for stochastic and β‐convergence. Cross‐section tests are performed to examine the impact of legal systems, education, natural resources, economic freedom, and other variables. We find that political freedoms are converging for one‐half of the countries. Additionally, we find that the level of freedom is significantly related to the legal system, education, economic freedom, and natural resources. (JEL O57, O40, C3)
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.