The control of the most important pest of stored maize, the weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: Curculionidae), is mainly achieved with the use of pyrethroid insecticides. However, the intensive use of these compounds has led to the selection of resistant populations and has compromised the control efficacy of this insect pest. Here, the toxicity of indoxacarb for a potential use in the control of S. zeamais was assessed on 13 Brazilian populations. Concentration-mortality bioassays, in the presence of synergists (piperonyl butoxide, triphenyl phosphate, and diethyl maleate), were used to assess potential metabolic-based indoxacarb resistance mechanisms. We also assessed the behavioral (locomotory) responses of these populations to indoxacarb exposure. The results showed significant differences between the populations (LD50 values ranged from 0.06 to 13.99 mg a.i/kg of grains), resulting in resistance ratios of >200-fold between the least (Canarana-MT) and the most (Espirito Santo do Pinhal-SP) susceptible populations. The results obtained with synergized indoxacarb suggest the involvement of esterases and glutathione-S-transferases on indoxacarb action, and also suggest the involvement of cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenases as a potential indoxacarb resistance mechanism in Brazilian populations of S. zeamais. Although indoxacarb-induced behavioral avoidance varied among populations, some resistant populations (e.g., Canarana-MT) were able to reduce exposure to indoxacarb by spending more time in the nontreated areas. Collectively, our findings indicate that the behavioral (locomotory) and physiological responses of these insects may compromise the control efficacy of oxadiazine insecticides (e.g., indoxacarb) in Brazilian populations of S. zeamais.
An understudied aspect of insecticides is their stress on non-targeted pest species. Sublethal insecticidal stress may elicit a range of protective and non-protective responses that may affect behaviour and sexual fitness of the exposed insects, which may lead to negative, neutral or stimulatory (i.e. hormetic) responses. We assessed the behavioural response of the Neotropical brown stink bug, Euschistus heros, a soybean pest in the Neotropical region with increasing pest status, following exposure to chlorantraniliprole, pyriproxyfen and spinosad, insecticides commonly used against soybean caterpillars and whiteflies. Both individuals, or only the male or female of each mating pair, were exposed. Reproductive behaviour and output were measured to determine insecticide-and gender-mediated fitness. We found that treatment scenario significantly affected mating behaviour, and that the duration of some behaviours were significantly affected. Chlorantraniliprole and pyriproxyfen reduced latency to mate, while spinosad increased this behaviour. Insecticide exposure also decreased the interacting time of each couple and male antennation of the female. Fertility table analyses of exposed couples indicated negligible effect of pyriproxyfen exposure, while spinosad extended generation time and reduced net reproductive rate, leading to lower rates of population growth of the brown stink bug. In contrast, chlorantraniliprole led to only a slight extension on the generation time, but enhanced net reproductive rate of the stink bug leading to higher rates of population growth; no effects on sexual fitness were observed, as both compounds exhibited similar effect on females and males. Latency to mate correlated significantly with the population growth rate. The positive response to chlorantraniliprole exposure reinforces the notion that sublethal exposure of the brown stink bug to this insecticide may lead to stimulatory (hormetic) response favouring its outbreaks in soybean fields.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.