The feasibility of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with involved field radiotherapy (IFRT) for Japanese patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) remains unclear. Here we reviewed our initial experience of IMRT with IFRT for Japanese patients with LA-NSCLC to evaluate the feasibility of the treatment. Twenty LA-NSCLC patients who were treated with IMRT with IFRT during November 2019 to October 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients received 60 Gy in 30 fractions of IMRT and were administered concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy. The median patient age was 71 years old and the group included 15 men and 5 women. The patient group included 2 patients with stage IIB, 11 patients with stage IIIA, 5 patients with stage IIIB, and 2 patients with stage IIIC disease. Histological diagnosis was squamous cell carcinoma in 14 patients, adenocarcinoma in 5 patients, and non-small cell lung cancer in 1 patient. The median follow-up period was 8 months. The incidence of grade 3 or greater pneumonitis was 5%, and grade 3 or greater esophagitis was not observed. None of the patients developed regional lymph node, with only recurrence reported so far. These findings indicate that IMRT with IFRT for Japanese patients with LA-NSCLC is feasible in terms of acute toxicity. Further study with a larger number of patients and longer follow-up to clarify the effect of treatment on patient prognosis is required.

Background: Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) has been found to significantly improve overall survival (OS). However, the effect of durvalumab on local control remains unclear. Here, we evaluated the effect of the durvalumab on local control in comparison with the clinical result of patients treated with CCRT alone. Methods: A total of 120 LA-NSCLC patients including 76 patients with CCRT alone and 44 patients with CCRT followed by durvalumab were analyzed. Baseline patient characteristics of CCRT alone cohort and durvalumab cohort were compared with student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables and with chi-squared test for categorical variables. Local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and OS rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the log-rank test. Results: There were 19 patients with stage II disease and 101 patients with stage III disease. Age, sex, histopathological type, T classification, N classification, clinical stage, tumor volume and dose fractionation schedule were not significantly different between the CCRT alone and durvalumab cohorts. The one-year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort (86%) compared with the CCRT alone cohort (62%) (P = 0.005), whereas no significant difference was observed in either PFS (P = 0.864) or OS (P = 0.443) between the CCRT and durvalumab cohorts. Conclusions: The one-year LC rate was significantly higher in the durvalumab cohort compared with the CCRT alone cohort. Although the follow-up period was too short to draw definitive conclusions, the study revealed that durvalumab might have a significant effect on LC.

The aim of this study is to analyze the incidence and risk factors for pneumonitis when immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are combined with palliative thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for lung cancer. We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients with lung cancer who received ICIs after palliative thoracic RT (30 Gy in 10 fractions). Their ICIs were pembrolizumab (n = 17), nivolumab (n = 8) and atezolizumab (n = 4). Median follow-up period was 10 months. The median interval between starting RT and starting ICI was 25 days. Pneumonitis events were grade 1 (n = 10; 34%), grade 2 (n = 4; 14%) and grade 3 (n = 3; 10%). Obstructive pneumonia was significantly associated with grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis (P = 0.036). Age, sex, ICI agent, interval between RT and ICI and history of ICI before RT were not associated with grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis. Tumor volume; Brinkman index; dosimetric factors, such as lung V5, V10, V20, V30 and mean lung dose (MLD); lactate dehydrogenase; and C-reactive protein did not significantly differ between the grade ≤ 1 and grade ≥ 2 pneumonitis groups. Levels of sialylated carbohydrate antigen KL-6 were evaluated in 27 patients before RT; they significantly differed between patients with grade ≤ 2 pneumonitis (mean: 431 U/ml) and those with grade ≥ 3 pneumonitis (mean: 958 U/ml; P < 0.001). Patients who receive ICI after palliative thoracic RT should be carefully followed-up, especially those who have had obstructive pneumonia or high KL-6 levels.

Background In this study, we developed a simple method for evaluating achievement degree of lung dose optimization in individual patients with locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Methods Data of 28 patients with stage IIB to IIIC NSCLC were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were treated with IMRT and a simulated three‐dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D‐CRT) plan created for them. Dose‐volume parameters of lung were analyzed for their correlation with radiation pneumonitis (RP). Results Over a median follow‐up of 14 months, grade 1 pneumonitis was diagnosed in 14 patients (50%), grade 2 pneumonitis in 11 (39%), and grade 3 pneumonitis in one (4%). Two patients did not develop pneumonitis. None of the patients developed grade 4 or 5 pneumonitis. Regarding dose‐volume parameter ratios between IMRT and simulated 3D‐CRT, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that mean lung dose (MLD) IMRT /MLD 3D‐CRT had the largest area under curve (0.750). Cumulative 6‐month incidences of grade 2 or greater RP were 78.4% versus 19.5% (MLD IMRT /MLD 3D‐CRT, ≥1.0 or less); this difference was significant ( p < 0.05). Conclusions We found that cutoff values for dose volume parameter ratios significantly predict grade 2 or greater RP. We believe that these parameter ratios could be useful in assisting evaluation of achievement degree of lung dose optimization in IMRT for LA‐NSCLC.

Background This retrospective study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of high-dose stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using a CyberKnife® for patients with stage I peripheral non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Ninety-six patients with stage I peripheral NSCLC who were treated with SBRT using a CyberKnife® from August 2010 to June 2019 were identified and included in this study. Local control (LC), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and late toxicity were evaluated. Potential risk factors associated with LC, LPFS, PFS, or OS were investigated by univariate analyses. Results Data of 96 patients were examined. The prescribed dose to the tumor was 54 Gy in 3 fractions in 91 patients and 60 Gy in 3 fractions in 5 patients. The median follow-up duration was 27 months. The 2-year LC, LPFS, PFS, and OS rates were 97%, 88%, 84%, and 90%, respectively. The T factor was significantly correlated with LC, LPFS, and PFS. The 2-year LC rate for patients with T1a/T1b and T1c/T2a disease was 100% and 90%, respectively (p < 0.05), and the 2-year PFS rate for the corresponding patients was 95% and 65%, respectively (p < 0.001). One patient (1%) developed grade 3 radiation pneumonitis. Conclusions High-dose SBRT using a CyberKnife® for stage I peripheral NSCLC produced favorable treatment outcomes with acceptable late toxicity. Further studies are needed to improve the treatment outcomes for patients with T1c/T2a disease.