Introduction: Newly developed Systematic Coronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE-2) and the version for older people [(SCORE2-OP) ≥70 years] algorithms for 10-yr incident cardiovascular disease (CVD) have been derived incorporating European and US populations. Its performance has not been externally validated in community-based populations representative of real-world clinical practice. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the SCORE-2 and SCORE2-OP algorithms will accurately estimate 10-yr risk of first-onset CVD in this population. Methods: Consecutive patients who, between 1998-2000, sought primary care in Olmsted county, MN, and were followed-up using the Rochester Epidemiology Project. Inclusion criteria were set as those used in the derivation of the original algorithm. The composite outcome of CVD was defined as first myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular mortality. We compared predicted and observed events and generated C-statistics across predefined risk subgroups. Results: We included 22,858 adults, mean age of 55.11±11.58 (13.50% >70 yr) 54% females. After a mean follow-up of 9.55±1.5 yr, 2,145 events were observed. 6.39% of subjects for SCORE-2 and 59.88% using SCORE2-OP were considered at high risk. Overall, the SCORE-2 had better discrimination than the SCORE2-OP (C-statistic: 0.72 and 0.64, respectively) (Fig B-D). The algorithms performed better in individuals 50-69 yr while underpredicting in younger individuals and overpredicting CVD in ages above 70 (in the low and moderate risk group) (Fig A-C). Prediction was mostly similar between men, women and middle-aged individuals but demonstrated pronounced underprediction in older men (Fig B-D). Conclusions: The SCORE-2 Risk prediction tool performed with marginal results whereas the SCORE2-OP had poor performance when predicting CVD events in a community cohort representing real-world clinical practice in a non-European population.
Introduction: We have previously shown that ECG-derived age (ECG-Age) predicts all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality, reflecting physiologic age. We hypothesized that ECG-Age minus chronological age (Age-Gap) would be associated with coronary artery calcium (CAC) assessed by computer tomography. Methods: We developed a neural network model to predict ECG-Age using 12 lead ECGs from 399,750 training, 99,977 validation and 275,056 testing patients. We then applied the algorithm to 41,202 consecutive patients that from 1997-2020 underwent clinically indicated CAC and ECG within 1 year. Major modifiable CV risk factors were collected as part of preventive cardiology or general medical evaluations. Exclusion criteria were statin therapy, pacemakers, or history of coronary artery disease. Results: We included 41,202 subjects (68.5% males, 83.6% Caucasian), mean chronological age was 55.2±9.1 yrs and the ECG-Age was 56.01±9.3 yrs. The mean Age-Gap was -0.78±7 yrs, R 2 =0.78, p<0.0001. Mean CAC score was 140.2±532.3, and 21,483 (52%) had CAC >0. After adjustment for age and sex, those older by ECG (defined as having a positive Age-Gap) were more likely to have CAC>0 (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.34-2.37 for those with >1 but <2 SD of a positive Age-Gap; and OR 1.80, 95% CI 1.34-2.37 for those with ≥2 SD of a positive Age-Gap), while those younger by ECG were less likely to have any CAC (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.87 for those with >1 but <2 SD of a negative Age-Gap; and OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.67-0.84 for those with ≥2 SD of a negative Age-Gap), respectively. This association remained significant after multivariate adjustment, Fig. A and increased with CAC burden, Fig. B , all P for trend <0.01. Conclusions: The difference between physiologic AI-ECG age and chronologic age, something likely representing rate of biological aging, is associated with presence of CAC, further supporting the hypothesis that AI-ECG age can identify people more likely to have subclinical coronary atherosclerosis.
Background: The body Mass Index (BMI) is commonly used in clinical practice to screen for obesity and resulting cardiometabolic conditions. Nonetheless, BMI has limited utility as it cannot differentiate body fat (BF). Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that BF content measured by air displacement plethysmography (Bod-Pod®) had a stronger association with prevalent hypertension (HTN), diabetes mellitus (DM) and dyslipidemia (DLP) when compared to BMI. Methods: We performed a community-based cross-sectional study on adults attending an employee wellness center from January 2007-December 2011 who had had a body composition assessment with Bod-Pod®. We excluded subjects with history of myocardial infarction, coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke at baseline. The prevalence of HTN, DM and DLP was assessed across quartiles of BF% and BMI categories. Their association with BF% and BMI was evaluated using linear regression models that adjusted for age, sex, and white race. Results: We included 3,052 individuals; 68 % were women, and the mean age ± SD was 42.09±12.8, BMI was 27.9±6.2; BF% 31.88±10.69, 892 (29.2%) were obese by BMI. Cardiometabolic conditions were prevalent in 496 (16.2%) with HTN, 378 (12.4%) with DM and 743 (24.4%) with DLP. While the prevalence of DM, HTN and DLP increased across BF% quartiles (all p for linearity>0.01), this was not always the case across BMI categories (p for linearity<0.05 for HTN and DLP, and 0.04 for DM) see Figure A . Elevated BF %, better identified individuals with HTN (AUC 0.766 vs 0.625; p<0.001), DM (AUC 0.643 vs. 0.568; p<0.001), DLP (AUC 0.758 vs. 0.593; p<0.001). Conclusion: BF content is better associated with a higher prevalence of HTN, DM, and DLP. Highlighting the role of body composition assessment in primary prevention. Dyslipidemia.
Background: We developed a deep learning algorithm to predict elevated coronary artery calcium (CAC) score from 12-lead electrocardiograms (CAC- ECG). We tested the hypothesis that this CAC-ECG algorithm will independently predict long-term survival. Methods: We leveraged a historical cohort of 43,210 consecutive patients who from the years 1997-2020 underwent clinically indicated ECG-gated unenhanced chest computed tomography (CT) to identify and quantify CAC and had an ECG within 1 year of the CT. Data on cardiovascular risk (CV) factors, and to calculate the Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) for ASCVD was collected as part of preventive cardiology or general medical evaluations. We used the oldest CAC in record and excluded those taking statins at the time of the CAC. The algorithm was trained in 60% of the cohort, and the association between CAC-ECG and survival was evaluated with multivariate cox proportional hazard models in 40% of the remaining observations. Results: Of the 17,284 evaluated patients, mean ± SD age 55.9 ± 9.9, 33% female, 3,714 (21%) had elevated CAC ≥ 300. During an average of 15±5.9 years follow-up, 848 (5%) patients died. The algorithm’s area under the receiving operating characteristics curve (ROC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy to detect a CAC ≥ 300 were 0.83, 0.90%, 0.56%, 0.60%. Those with elevated CAC had a nearly two-fold risk of death, a value similar to those deemed positive by the ECG-CAC algorithm ( Figure A ). Risk of death increased with CAC-ECG probability quartiles ( Figure A ). The CAC-ECG algorithm enhanced predicted capabilities of the PCE across all ASCVD risk subgroups ( Figure B ), as well as in those with no CAC and elevated CAC ( Figure C ), all p for trend <0.001. Conclusions: A deep learning-enabled CAC-ECG algorithm was independently associated with long-term survival and enhanced current risk prediction paradigms. The CAC-ECG algorithm could help identify individuals at risk in primary prevention of CV disease.
Introduction: Increasing evidence unravels the role of loneliness and social connection in cardiovascular diseases potentially mediating accelerated biological aging. The present study aims to explore the association between social connection and biological aging as determinate by artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiography (ECG). Methods: This is an observational retrospective cohort of adults aged ≥18 seen at Mayo Clinic from 2019-2022 who completed the social determinants of health questionnaire and had a 12-lead ECG within one year of completing the questionnaire. Five questions were asked to understand each patient’s social connection . The answers were scored to assess their level of social connection from socially isolated (score of 0) to socially connected (score of 4). The biological age was predicted from ECGs using the previously developed convolutional neural network (AI-ECG age). Delta age (Δage) was defined as AI-ECG age minus chronological age, where positive values reflect an older than expected age. Results: We included 280,323 subjects (chronological age 59.7±16.4 years, 51% female). The average AI-ECG age was 59.5±13.5 year. Better social connection status correlated with lower delta age (β=-0.33 (95%CI, -0.38 and -0.28, p<0.001, adjusted to chronological age and sex). Conversely, individuals reporting the least social connection were an average of 2 years older than expected whereas those with the most social connection were 2 years younger than expected by AI-ECG (Figure 1). Conclusions: Social connection is strongly associated with slower biological aging compared to chronological aging, independent of the conventional cardiovascular risk factors. This observation underscores the need to address social connection as a healthcare determinant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.