Background
Self‐medication with antibiotics is one of the leading causes of antibiotic resistance and drug therapy problems, making antibiotic self‐medication practices a global concern. Despite global efforts to limit these practices, self‐medication with antibiotics remains prevalent in developing countries. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and patterns of self‐medication with antibiotics in Jordan and to compare the findings of self‐medication practices with antibiotics with results from 2006.
Method
A cross‐sectional community‐based study used a convenient sampling technique and recruited a large sample from all over Jordan. Between February and April 2019 trained 5th‐year pharmacy students recruited participants (eg, door to door) who had taken antibiotics in the preceding month. The questionnaire consisted of 14 questions that aimed to describe the patterns of self‐medication with antibiotics.
Results
A total of 1928 participants took part in this study. Of the 1928 respondents, 40.4% reported having used an antibiotic without a prescription in the previous month. Participants who had self‐medicated with antibiotics had primarily used them for sore throat and influenza. Self‐medicated participants had obtained antibiotics primarily from pharmacies (57.2%) and relied primarily on pharmacists (34.8%) and their own previous experience (35.2%) for information on the proper use of antibiotics. The rate of self‐medication with antibiotics in Jordan in 2019 (40.4%) had not changed significantly since 2006 (39.5%, P = .295). However, self‐medication practices (eg, source of antibiotic supply and information) have changed over the year.
Conclusion
The findings of this study revealed that the prevalence of self‐medication with antibiotics in Jordan remains high. This is a significant concern that requires a quick response from the government authorities to develop a collaborative approach to stop the dispensing of antibiotics without a prescription.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the content available on Facebook pharmacy groups in Jordan regarding the perception of the pharmacists’ role during the coronavirus pandemic in Jordan.
Methods: Researchers identified Facebook pharmacy groups through the search engine on the Facebook website. The main search keywords were pharmacy, pharmacist, pharmacists, and Jordan using both Arabic and English. Two researchers analyzed the posts and discussion threads on local pharmacy Facebook groups in a period between March 20th and April 3rd. A total of 184 posts and threads were identified for the purpose of the study.
Results: Identified threads and responses resulted in three overarching themes: pharmacists having a positive role during the pandemic, taking additional responsibilities and services, and having passive or negative roles. A positive role was seen in pharmacists acting as first-line healthcare providers, creating public’s awareness regarding COVID-19, and being responsible for chronic medication refill during the pandemic. Taking additional responsibilities was summarized in home deliveries and involvement in industrial and corporate efforts to deal with the pandemic. A passive/negative role was seen mostly among hospital pharmacists not being proactive during the pandemic and by pharmacists trying to maximize profits during pandemic time.
Conclusions: Pharmacists perceived their role as a positive role during the coronavirus pandemic. Not only they took responsibilities for their daily services during the crises, but they took additional responsibilities to assure patient safety and satisfaction.
Several factors might contribute to clopidogrel resistance including gender, concomitant use of calcium channel blockers, HDL and CYP2C19*2 polymorphism.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.