No abstract

Article 246 paragraph (2) of Law No. 11 Year 2006 concerning Aceh Government may stipulate that the Aceh government and the Aceh region determine the flag and emblem that reflects the privileges and specificity. It is indeed the opposite opinion with the provision of Article 6 (4) of Governement Regulation No. 77 Year  2007 on Regional Symbols which states that the logo design of regional flag should not have similarity in its essential part or in its entirety with logo design and the flag of the banned organization or association or institution or separatist movement in Indonesian. The above explanation makes the writer interested in aanalysing it further with existing legal theory. The research question is what is the position of the flag and emblem of Aceh in relation to legal justice. What is the influence of the flag and emblem of the province of Aceh in the effort to unite the people of Aceh towards legal certainty. How does the flag and emblem of Aceh influence legal order in Indonesia, and is there any legal utility. The method used is descriptive research analysis which is a study that aims to describe or illustrate systematically, factually and accurately a population or certain regions regarding the nature or certain factors. Research results show that the Qanun made should meet the elements of legal objectives in order to be more beneficial to the community at large.

Penelitian ini bertujuan mengetahui pengaturan tentang pemerintahan daerah terkait dengan asas desentralisasi asimetris sehingga lebih leluasa mengurus rumah tangga sendiri. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian konseptual berupaya menemukan konsep-konsep hubungan pusat dan daerah menurut UUDNRI Tahun 1945. Berdasarkan hasil pembahasan yang ada, hasil penelitian ini sebagai berikut: pertama, konsep desentralisasi asimetris ini sudah lama dicari formatnya karena amanah konstitusi perlu interpretasi lebih jauh sehingga benar-benar menemukan konsep ideal bagi Pemerintah Indonesia. Kedua, kehadiran Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah memang sudah menggunakan prinsip otonomi seluas-luasnya sehingga ada keluasaan untuk mengatur daerahnya sendiri. Namun peneliti berupaya mencari format baru, yang peneliti tawarkan ialah desentralisasi asimetris bagi semua daerah Indonesia walaupun hal ini terkesan sulit namun hal itu apabila dilakukan secara bersama maka akan mudah untuk dilaksanakan. Ketiga, terkait desentralisasi asimetris untuk Indonesia ini sudah diterapkan terhadap empat daerah yakni DKI Jakarta, Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta, Aceh dan Papua namun ke depan Indonesia akan dengan mudah melakukan perubahan lagi terhadap Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintah Daerah. Keempat, terkait dengan kewenangan daerah yang nanti menjadi sangat luas tentunya metode pengawasan akan jauh lebih diperketat dari pada sebelumnya karena desentralisasi memperkenankan ke level kekuasaan pemerintahan yang lebih rendah atau di bawah untuk menentukan sejumlah isu yang langsung mereka perhatikan.This study aims to understand the local governance arrangements in relate to asymmetric decentralization principles which allows them to take care of their own concerns more freely. This study is a conceptual attempt to discover the concepts of central-region relations by The 1945 Constitution of Republic of Indonesia. Based on the discussions available, the results of this study are: first, the concept of asymmetric decentralization has long been sought for its format as a constitutional mandate needs further interpretation to find the ideal concept for the Government of Indonesia; second, the presence of the Law no. 23 year 2014 about Regional Government has already used the principle of broad autonomy so there are discretions to manage their own regions. Yet, the researcher is willing to find a new format, in this case is asymmetric decentralization to all areas of Indonesia. Although it seems difficult to implement, in fact it can be easier to be applied together; third, asymmetric decentralization in Indonesia has actually been implemented to four regions (Jakarta, Yogyakarta, Aceh, and Papua), but the researcher is expecting more that in the future Indonesia will be easily made further changes to the Law no. 23 year 2014 about Regional Government; fourth, related to the regional authority which will be more comprehensive, the monitoring methods will automatically be much tighter than before. That is because decentralization allows lower government power level to determine the issues they directly notice.

This study wants to examine the suitability of Aceh Qanun with National Law related to the Hierakicity of laws and regulations in Indonesia. In theory it is possible that the Aceh Government can build its own hierarchies that are not the same as the Central Government. This relates to the authority of the Aceh Qanun which is not the same as the Regional Regulation but the hierarchy that is built but meets the basic norms of the Indonesian constitution. There are two focuses which are the focus of this research. First, what is the character of the Aceh Qanun as a legal umbrella in the implementation of post-autonomy Aceh and post-peaceful Aceh? Second, What Is the Future of Law in Aceh? The results of the first research, the character of the Aceh Qanun as a legal umbrella in the implementation of post-autonomy Aceh and post-peaceful Aceh is expected to be able to build Aceh better because of the presence of Law Number 18 Year 2001 and Law Number 11 Year 2006 regarding new hopes for the people of Aceh itself specifically in the field of Islamic sharia. Second, the future of law in Aceh in the discussion of legal development, is greatly developing from creating new norms in Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayah Law, because regulating jinayah law in Aceh does not have to draw the Criminal Code or the Criminal Procedure Code.

This study aims to analyze 1) How is the development of the allocation of balancing funds (DAU, DAK, and DBH) in Jambi Province 2) What is the condition of the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province 3) How does the allocation of balancing funds (DAU, DAK, and DBH) affect the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province. The analysis used is a descriptive quantitative analysis and uses secondary data. From the results of this study, it was found that the development of the allocation of Balancing Funds (DAU, DAK, and DBH) in Jambi Province tends to increase. The development of the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province tends to decline. The average value of Williamson Index Jambi Province in 2010-2019 is 0.47, so it can be concluded that the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province is in the medium category. DAU and DAK have a significant effect on the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province, while DBH does not have a significant effect on the level of inequality between regions in Jambi Province.