This study approached the Lesson Study strategy as a support for planning academic activities of teachers who intend to adopt or contribute to the adoption of an inclusive perspective in Higher Education. The general objective of this study was to describe preliminary indicators of the use of the Lesson Study as a teaching practice capable of enabling an inclusive perspective, in the context of Higher Education. Specifically, we aim to: a) identify strategies by student with and without markers (social, linguistic, ethnic, neuromotor, among others) as suggestions for the teaching-learning process with an inclusive perspective, and b) compare these strategies and discuss them from the point of view of the teaching practice aspects tested in this analysis. With a predominantly qualitative approach, this research was characterized as descriptive and the investigation instruments used for data collection consisted of interviews, observation and field notes. Three university professors and a group of twelve students, four of them with markers (social, linguistic, ethnic, neuromotor, among others), and eight of them without any makers participated in this analysis. The results allowed to highlight four specific indicators of the Lesson Study and 26 types of strategies indicated by the students (with and without markers) as suggestions for support during teaching practices. It was observed that those provided by students without markers did not differ much from those presented by the students with markers, except in specific situations, such as those pointed out by the deaf student. The obtained data contributed to the discussions on the existing policies and guidelines generated in the University itself and, in particular, the analysis provided professional improvement of the involved professors, in addition to the indication of possibilities of this improvement in relation to the other professors who are concerned with the adoption of actions with inclusive education perspectives.
Purpose This paper aims to present an overview of the design thinking (DT) methodology applied to information science research focusing on the user journey. DT stages are essential to understand, create and implement solutions based on the identified problems. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies bibliographic, theoretical and exploratory research based on the literature from DT methodology and information science. Findings The area of information science has not fully incorporated DT methodology on its practices, and DT presents considerable potential to support user experience. Practical implications Raise awareness of the information science community regarding the DT methodology as an alternative to apply to various types of research. Originality/value DT brings a unique contribution to engage people toward innovation in information centers; the paper is original, as it provides insights on the application of DT to improve the user journey related to information.
Resumo Este artigo objetiva expor aspectos relacionados à criação, organização e uso formal dos conteúdos informacionais em ambientes híbridos. Propõe-se que o Design da Informação (DI) deva ser considerado nos seus desdobramentos de ciência, disciplina e metodologia como complementar nas ações de Curadoria Digital, área emergente da Ciência da Informação (CI). O estudo discorre sobre como o DI converge recursos da Web Social Semântica na Curadoria Digital para facilitar a interação e criação de novos conteúdos, essenciais para a memória coletiva e a cultura contemporâneas. Trata-se de uma discussão teórico científica, fundamentada na literatura da área e em praticas exploratórias. A discussão envolve os seguintes temas: o Design da Informação, a compreensão cibernética dos sistemas e a interoperabilidade imbricadas na Curadoria Digital, e por fim, a interoperabilidade de sistemas e a convergência de linguagens. Esta pesquisa discute, assim, conceitos que podem atuar como instrumentos e metodologias na Ciência da Informação. No contexto informacional contemporâneo a CI e o DI são interdisciplinares como recurso fundamental para otimizar a qualidade da informação e dos dados digitais em uma Curadoria Digital. Estas áreas interdisciplinares dialogam e estabelecem ações conversacionais entre saberes para melhorias constantes dos fluxos informacionais.
O uso de Web colaborativa em ambientes digitais de comunicação e disseminação da informação por instituições museológicas possibilita, de forma ideal, o acesso e a interação com internautas. Entretanto, percebe-se que, no Brasil, os Websites de museus afro, em sua grande maioria, utilizam, ainda, de um modelo informacional na ambiência virtual caracterizado como Web 1.0. Buscamos, neste sentido, sob a égide da Ciência da Informação (CI), comparar e analisar recursos do Design da Informação (DI) e de Curadoria Digital do Website do Museu Afro Brasil (MAB) e do Canadian Museum of History nas convergências de linguagens em suas interfaces de interação. A metodologia se caracteriza como teórica e exploratória, com fundamentação teórica sobre o Design da Informação e funcionalidades da Web 2.0. A análise comparativa com Canadian Museum of History oferece subsídios para a verificação da interatividade e pode ser modelar.Palavras-Chave: Informação e Tecnologia. Web colaborativa. Design da Informação. Curadoria Digital. Museus.Link: http://www2.marilia.unesp.br/revistas/index.php/bjis/article/view/6042
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.