Background The purpose of this study was to compare the Image Quality, Contrast Medium Volume, and Radiation dose in renal angiography performed using Turbo Flash mode and dual-energy (DE) mode in the third-generation dual-source dual-energy CT. This prospective observational study was performed on renal donors who underwent CTA imaging as a pre-transplant workup. The study population was divided into two groups. Group A underwent DECT renal angiography. Group B underwent Turbo Flash Mode CT renal angiography. For group A, a contrast volume of 1 ml/kg and for group B at 0.5 ml/kg was administered. Image Quality was evaluated objectively by calculating CNR and SNR and subjectively by a 5-point scale. Radiation Dose analysis was done by noting CTDIvol and DLP on the scanner system and calculating effective radiation dose (ED). Results The subjective image quality scores for the Turbo Flash group were comparable with the DE group in qualitative image analysis. Additionally, in the Turbo Flash group, there was a reduction in contrast media and effective radiation dose by 47.5% and 32.7%, respectively. Nevertheless, mean attenuation of the abdominal arteries, CNR, SNR, and Noise (S.D) showed statistical significance between the two groups (p value < 0.01). Conclusions To our knowledge, no previous study compared Turboflash mode with DE protocol in CT renal angiography in a donor group of patients. Turbo Flash CT is an excellent modality that is faster and has an added advantage of decreased radiation dose and contrast media volume reduction, which can be recommended for screening of voluntary kidney donors but needs further clinical studies, validation, and standardization with tailored protocols.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is the rare but most severe form of antiphospholipid syndrome with multiple organ ischemia developing over a short period of time. CAPS should be considered when imaging suggests an acute and concurrent multiorgan ischemia, associated with positive antiphospholipid antibodies. As CAPS can have fulminant irreversible complications, its early recognition is important to initiate the treatment promptly. We present three patients of CAPS who were managed at our institution.

Background: Postoperative neurological deficits following spinal decompression are often caused due to an expanding hematoma or other iatrogenic injuries. When a definitive etiology could not be identified, it may rarely be related to a reperfusion injury. Such unexplained neurological deficits are often associated with the presence of cord signal changes on imaging. It is assumed to result from ischemia-reperfusion injury and is often designated as “white cord syndrome” due to its imaging appearance. Such a diagnosis is made after excluding other differentials. Outcomes are variable based on the current literature. We report a patient with possible white cord syndrome following decompression and excision of cervicodorsal osteochondroma. Case Description: In this case report, we present a young patient who was admitted with slowly progressive paraplegia, and initial imaging showed C7-D1 pedunculated osteochondroma. He underwent an uneventful spinal laminectomy accompanied by tumor excision. In the immediate postoperative period, the patient became paraplegic and a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging was taken. It showed re-expansion of cord in the region of compression by the mass lesion at C7-D1 level with interval abnormal T2/IR hyper intensity extending from C6 to D1 levels. Conclusion: White cord syndrome is an extremely rare condition. It is postulated to be caused by reperfusion injury to the cord within areas of chronic ischemia due to compressive causes. We describe a child with white cord syndrome following decompression and excision of an osteochondroma.