Cooperative Principle on Speech Acts in The TrialsThe objective of this study is to examine the cooperative principle contained in the trials at Banda Aceh District Court. The cooperative principle examined in this study consists of the maxim of quality, the maxim of quantity, the maxim of manner, and the maxim of relevance. Data for the study was drawn from nine court cases involving specific and general crimes. Data collection was carried out by recording the trials with a voice recorder. Triangulation of data was carried out by linking the cooperative principle contained in the trial with the cooperative principle theory and comparing them with the findings of other researchers. The writer concluded that the maxims of quality and quantity contained in the trial are confirmation questions. This is because the judge already knows the answer because it is in the minutes. The defendant's answers were informative and did not exceed the judge's expectations. At the same time, the application of the maxim of the manner in the trial can occur because the information provided regarding the judge's questions is answered by the speech partner clearly and regularly. This is equivalent to the maxim of relevance which requires the exchange of information to be in accordance with the topic expected by the questionnaire.AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan mengkaji prinsip kerja sama yang terdapat dalam persidangan di Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh. Prinsip kerja sama yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini terdiri atas maksim kualitas, maksim kuantitas, maksim cara, dan maksim relevansi. Data penelitian berupa sembilan perkara persidangan yang meliputi pidana khusus dan pidana umum yang disidangkan. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan merekam persidangan dengan alat bantu perekam suara. Triangulasi data dilakukan dengan cara mengaitkan prinsip kerja sama yang terdapat dalam persidangan dengan teori prinsip kerja sama dan membandingkan dengan hasil penelitian yang dilakukan oleh peneliti lainnya. Penulis menyimpulkan bahwa maksim kualitas dan kuantitas yang terdapat dalam persidangan merupakan pertanyaan konfirmasi sebab hakim sudah mengetahui jawaban tersebut karena terdapat dalam berita acara. Jawaban yang diberikan oleh terdakwa bersifat informatif dan tidak melebihi ekspektasi hakim. Penerapan maksim cara dalam persidangan terjadi karena informasi yang diberikan dijawab oleh mitra tutur secara jelas dan teratur. Hal itu sejajar dengan maksim relevansi yang mengharuskan pertukaran informasi haruslah sesuai dengan topik yang diharapkan oleh penanya.

The problems in this study are the differences in phonology, lexical, morphology, and syntactic structure between Jamee (Aceh) and Minangkabau (Bukittinggi). The aim of this research is to know the difference of phonology, lexical, morphology, and syntactic structure between Jamee language and Minangkabau Bukittinggi language. The method used in this research was descriptive with qualitative approach. Data were collected by observation, interview, and documentation techniques. The data sources in this research were 5 speakers of Jamee language and 5 speakers of Minangkabau Bukittingi language. the data analysis procedures were data selection, data classification, and data presentation. The results of research in this article phonological differences, there were / ɛ / and / ɔ / in vocal system of Jamee, / a / while vocal system of Minangkabau Bukittinggi language and Jamee / ɣ / or / R / language consonant system, while Minangkabau Bukittinggi language / r /, then there were pronunciation differences include single vowels, double vowels, and consonants. These differences consist of nouns, adjectives, verbs, and adverbs. For affixation, the difference lies in the insertion (infix) -al-, -ar- in Jamee and -am-, -um- in Minangkabau Bukittinggi. The suffixes (suffixes) -en, -ken in Jamee, -in the Minangkabau language of Bukittinggi, and the ends (confix) there were me-ken, me-en, ma-kan, ma-an in Minangkabau language Bukittinggi, except prefixes. The prefixes of the two languages have similarity. The differences was also seen from word classification in verbs, nouns, adjectives, numerelia, and adverbs. In terms of the type of word repetition there was no difference only in the form of words or basic words only, while the sentence structure of the two languages have in similarities.