<p>Recognition of the exixtence of bendega as a traditional instituion in the Province of Bali is getting stroger after the issuance of Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali Nomor 11 tahun 2017 tentang Bendega. Even though i tis located as a traditional institution, bendega still given space to innovate in economic activities without ignoring the value of local wisdom. In Desa Adat Tuban, i tis found that there are groups of local people who are still pursuing the fishing profession. In addtion, this community group is also innovating in economic activities by utilizing the coastal areas which are Forest Park Conservation area Tahura.</p><p>The objectives of this study are (1) the find out and analyze the legal position of fishing groups in Desa Adat Tuban after issuance of Peraturan Daerah Provinsi Bali No 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Bendega; (2) knowing and analyzing the state’s recognition of fishermen groups in Desa Adat Tuban as the legal subject in charge of management of coastal areas.</p><p>This research is an empirical legal research. Using primary data obtained  hrough observation an interview techniques. The secondary data is the collected<br />thorugh a literature study. All data collected is the analyzed qualitatively. The output of this research is a secintific journal with ISSN. In connection with the TKT research, the target that can be achieved in this study is TKT 3 in accordance with the indicators that have been determined.</p>

Kegiatan bermain layang-layang dapat merugikan orang, seperti putus dan menyangkut di gardu listrik, menyebabkan kerusakan pada barang orang lain, dan membahayakan kegiatan penerbangan maka menjadi hal yang perlu diatur dalam hukum. Dari pada latar belakang penelitian ini mengangkat rumusan masalah yaitu bagaimanakah tinjauan yuridis penerbangan layang-layang yang mengakibatkan kerusakan barang orang lain dan upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh korban perusakan barang akibat penerbangan layang-layang yang merusak barang milik orang lain. Jenis penelitian ini adalah menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum yang bersifat normatif, yaitu pendekatan melalui perspektif norma-norma yang telah ada atau dengan kata lain merupakan penelitian berupa inventarisasi perundang-undangan yang berlaku.Kesimpulan dalam penelitian ini yaitu tinjauan yuridis terhadap penerbangan layang-layang yang merusak barang milik orang lain diatur dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) yaitu kejahatan pengrusakan dan penghancuran benda (verneiling of beschadiging van goerderen), pasal 406 sampai dengan 412 mengatur tentang kejahatan-kejahatan yang mengandung unsur merusak atau tingkah laku yang mengandung sifat demikian terhadap suatu harta benda dan Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan oleh korban perusakan barang akibat penerbangan layang-layang yang  merusak barang milik orang lain, yaitudengandua acara yaitu dengan litigasi dan non-litigasi dimana non-litigasi dilakukan dengan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) atau Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) dimana penyelesaian perkara diselesaikan dengan konsultasi, negoisasi, mediasi, konsiliasi, penilaian ahli. The activity of playing a kite can harm people, such as breaking and getting stuck in an electric substation, causing damage to other people's goods, and endangering aviation activities, so it is something that needs to be regulated by law. From the background of this research, it raises the formulation of the problem, namely how is the juridical review of kite flights that result in damage to other people's goods and legal remedies that can be taken by victims of damage to goods due to kite flights that damage other people's property. This type of research is using normative legal research, namely an approach through the perspective of existing norms or in other words a research in the form of an inventory of applicable legislation. other people's property is regulated in the Criminal Code (KUHP), namely the crime of destroying and destroying objects (verneiling of beschadiging van goerderen), articles 406 to 412 regulate crimes that contain destructive elements or behavior that contains such characteristics. against a property and legal remedies that can be taken by victims of damage to goods due to kite flights that damage other people's property, namely with two events, namely litigation and non-litigation where non-litigation is carried out with Alternative Dispute Resolution (APS) or Alternative Dispute Resolution n (ADR) where the settlement of cases is resolved by consultation, negotiation, mediation, conciliation, expert judgment.

<p>The results of research entitle the protection of consumers in buying and selling houses through developers in Denpasar is only limited on minor damages when the guarantee given by the developer, in the case of buying and selling houses through developers in Denpasar concerning the issue of consumer rights both safety, comfort and security in occupy housesthat are purchased through the Developer. As for the resolution of the problem between the developer and the<br />consumer in Article 52 of Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection and the absence of a settlement in the court institution. In the empirical level, the solution is choosing a consensus and if there is no agreement between the two parties, then asking help from the Notary as the mediator is needed. The constraints faced by developers and consumers in resolving disputes of law No. 8 of 1999 concerning consumer protection, namely the constraints faced by socio-juridical namely due to the lack of understanding of consumers and developers toward the existence of the Consumer Protection Act, andthe lack of socialization in the community about the existence of the Consumer Protection Act. In this case, the non-juridical constraints due to<br />the lack of human resources, both those that are on the developer and the consumers, beside that the facilities and devices do not support it. Therefore, the efforts would be made in order to be able to resolve the problem of housing consumer dispute in Denpasar. Another obstacle is the lack of consumers’ aspirations in choosingthe resolution ofthe consumer dispute until the judicial<br />route. The efforts that is made both by developers and consumers in dealing with obstacles in the settlement of buying and selling houses through developers, namely: legal protection for the people. It is divided into 2, Preventive Efforts (Preventive) and Refressive efforts.</p>

The purpose of this research is to find out the Prevention and Countermeasure of Wild levies on behalf of indigenous village. The type of research used in this research is empirical research. Empirical research is research that examines and analyzes the legal workers in society (law in action) the main data used is data sourced from the Prevention and Countermeasure of wild levies on behalf of indigenous village.                 The results indicate that the prevention and countermeasures of Wild levies on behalf of Indigenous Villages. The goals of community welfare and community protection, prevention and countermeasures of crime must be carried out with integral of the means of reasoning penal and non-penal. Viewed from the political point of the most strategic policy law through preventive, preventive and countermeasures of crime by means of reasoning and non-precision whose functionalization or operationalization through several stages, namely, the legislative policy stage, the judicial policy stage and the executive policy stage. Repressive efforts are a last resort in overcoming illegal levies efforts made to suppress the magnitude of the number of Hungarian criminal acts in order to have a deterrent effect and fear for perpetrators or communities who are later in wanting to commit criminal offenses will undo the intentions of the repressive legal remedies.

No abstract