Active workstations are associated with improved health outcomes, but differences in cognitive and typing outcomes between the types of active workstations are unclear. We addressed two main questions: (1) Are there differences in cognitive and typing performance between seated and active workstations? (2) Are there differences in cognitive and typing performance between cycling and treadmill workstations, specifically? Participants included 137 healthy young adults (74 female, mean age = 20.8 years) who completed two sessions. At session one (baseline), all participants completed cognitive and typing tests including the Rey-Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, a typing test, and a flanker task while sitting at rest. At session two, participants were randomized to an active workstation group (treadmill or cycling desk) during which they performed the tests listed above in a randomized fashion, using alternate versions when available. Participants showed significantly better attention and cognitive control scores during the active session as compared to the seated session, but worse verbal memory scores during the active session. Participants were faster and more accurate at typing during the active session relative to the seated session. There were no significant differences between cycling or treadmill workstations on any cognitive or typing outcomes. Improvements during active sessions may be influenced by practice effects, although alternate forms were used when possible. We conclude that active workstations do not seem to largely impact cognitive abilities, with the exception of a slight decrease in verbal memory performance. Findings suggest active workstations, whether walking or cycling, are useful to improve physical activity, particularly when completing tasks that do not require verbal memory recall.

No abstract

Although pathophysiological links between postmenopause and healthy aging remain unclear, both factors are associated with increased blood pressure and sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) in women. Activation of polymodal musculoskeletal neural afferents originating within adventia of venules modulates SNA and blood pressure control during exercise in healthy adults. We hypothesized transient subsystolic regional circulatory occlusion (RCO) during exercise sensitizes these afferents leading to augmented systemic vascular resistance (SVR)-mediated increased mean arterial pressure (MAP) in postmenopause vs. premenopause. Normotensive women in premenopause or postmenopause (n = 14 and 14; ages: 30 ± 9 and 55 ± 7 yr, respectively; P < 0.01) performed: 1) peak exercise testing and 2) fixed-load cycling at 30% peak workload (48 ± 11 and 38 ± 6 W, respectively; P < 0.01), whereby the initial 3 min were control exercise without RCO (CTL), thereafter including 2 min of bilateral-thigh RCO to 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 mmHg (randomized), with 2 min deflation between RCO. Both MAP (17 ± 4 vs. 4 ± 4%, P = 0.02) and SVR (16 ± 8 vs. -3 ± 8%, P = 0.04) increased at 80 mmHg from CTL in postmenopause vs. premenopause, respectively. However, cardiac index was similar in postmenopause vs. premenopause at 80 mmHg from CTL (1 ± 6 vs. 7 ± 6%, respectively; P = 0.15). There was no continuous effect of aging in MAP (P = 0.12), SVR (P = 0.07), or cardiac index (P = 0.18) models. These data suggest transient locomotor subsystolic RCO sensitizes musculoskeletal afferents, which provoke increased SVR to generate augmented MAP during exercise in postmenopause. These observations provide a novel approach for understanding the age-independent variability in exercise blood pressure control across the normotensive adult pre- to postmenopause spectrum.

IntroductionPeripheral nervous system feedback arising from mechanically and metabolically sensitive afferents (Group III/IV, respectively) are central components of the exercise pressor reflex. Experimentally, locomotor venous distention can be simulated via subsytolic regional circulatory occlusion (SubRCO) thereby augmenting the exercise pressor reflex. Furthermore, high pedal frequency increases type II muscle fiber recruitment during exercise likely increasing non‐oxidative metabolism. To date, studies investigating the influence of aging on the exercise pressor reflex have presented conflicting data with most utilizing small muscle mass exercise (e.g. handgrip). Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of SubRCO, pedal frequency, and the combination thereof on blood pressure (BP) during exercise in older and younger adults. We hypothesized that during exercise 1) independent of pedal frequencies and age, SubRCO will augment BP and 2) older adults will have greater increases in BP at high pedal frequencies with and without SubRCO compared younger adults.Methods10 younger (22±2 yrs; 4M/6W; 24±4 kg/m2) and 10 older (63±10yrs; 4M/6W; 24±4 kg/m2) adults participated in two study visits each consisting of two cycling exercise sessions at 20 W, with bilateral upper thigh pressure cuffs. Participants engaged in 3 minutes of exercise at 35 (LOW) or 100 (HIGH) rpm with 5 additional minutes of exercise at that rpm with no cuffing (CTL) or SubRCO in randomized order. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP, respectively) were measured via manual sphygmomanometry. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was calculated as (SBP‐DBP)/3+DBP and the changes in MAP from rest are reported.ResultsDuring LOW, SubRCO resulted in greater MAP than CTL in younger (CTL: 4±7; SubRCO: 13±7 mmHg) and older adults (CTL: 4±6; SubRCO: 13±4 mmHg) (both p<0.01). During HIGH, SubRCO resulted in greater MAP than CTL in younger (CTL: 7±4; SubRCO: 20±6 mmHg) and older adults (CTL: 20±9; SubRCO: 31±8 mmHg) (both p<0.01). Younger and older adults had greater increases in MAP during HIGH CTL and SubRCO compared to LOW CTL and SubRCO, respectively (all, p<0.01). Within LOW, there were no differences between younger and older adults during CTL or SubRCO (all, p>0.05). Within HIGH, older adults had greater increases in MAP than younger adults during CTL and SubRCO (both p<0.01).ConclusionThese data support the hypothesis that older compared to younger adults have a greater BP response at higher pedal frequencies during exercise. Our results suggest that aging contributes to a greater exercise pressor response to exercise, possibly due to greater feedback from group III/IV afferents.Support or Funding InformationNIH HL126638AHA 18POST3990251This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2019 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Introduction It is well established that the exercise pressor reflex contributes to cardiovascular control (e.g. mean arterial pressure (MAP)) during exercise. One arm of the exercise pressor reflex includes the metabolically sensitive group IV afferents (i.e. metaboreflex). The metaboreflex‐induced cardiovascular responses to exercise are incompletely understood, especially in women across the aging spectrum. For example, post‐menopausal women have greater increases in MAP and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) during locomotor muscle exercise compared to pre‐menopausal women. However, it is unclear if an exaggerated metaboreflex arising from the locomotor muscles is contributing to these cardiovascular adjustments with exercise in post‐menopausal women. We hypothesized that 1) post‐menopausal women will have an augmented MAP response with isolated metaboreflex activation compared to pre‐menopausal women and 2) the exaggerated increase in MAP in the post‐menopausal women will be primarily due to greater increases in SVR. Methods Pre‐ (n= 10, 25±3yrs, 24±3 kg/m2) and post‐menopausal women (n=12, 58±4yrs, 24±3 kg/m2) performed 2 sessions of cycling exercise at 20 W for 5 min with bilateral upper thigh pressure tourniquets inflated to 90 mmHg. At end exercise, the recovery was randomized to post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) to isolate the metaboreflex (via bilateral upper thigh pressure tourniquets rapidly inflated to suprasystolic pressure for 2 min) or normal recovery (NR) without intervention. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured via manual sphygmomanometry and MAP was calculated. Cardiac output was measured via open circuit acetylene wash‐in and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated. Data is reported as the absolute change from rest to recovery. Results MAP was elevated during PECO compared to NR in both groups (p<0.05), while MAP during PECO was greater in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women (20±9 vs. 13±5 mmHg, respectively) (p<0.05). Similarly, SVR was elevated during PECO compared to NR in both groups (p<0.05), while SVR was greater during PECO in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women (5±3 vs. 3±1 mmHg/L/min, respectively) (p<0.05). In contrast, cardiac output was not different between NR and PECO in either pre‐ (NR: 0.3±1 vs. PECO: −0.2±1 L/min) and post‐menopausal (NR: −0.1±1 vs. PECO: −0.7±0.9 L/min) (all, p>0.05). Conclusion These data demonstrate that isolated metaboreflex stimulation following whole‐body exercise results in exaggerated increases in MAP and SVR in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women. These data suggest that exercise pressor reflex‐mediated control of MAP during exercise is accentuated in post‐menopausal women with menopause status.