Introduction: The purpose of this study was to determine the cardiovascular consequences elicited by activation of the inspiratory muscle metaboreflex in heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) patients and controls. Methods: HFpEF patients (n=15; 69±10 yrs; 33±4 kg/m2) and controls (n=14; 70±8 yrs; 28±4 kg/m2) performed an inspiratory loading trial at 60% maximal inspiratory pressure (PIMAX) until task failure. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) was measured continuously. Near-infrared spectroscopy and bolus injections of indocyanine green dye were used to determine percent change in blood flow index (%ΔBFI) from baseline in the vastus lateralis and sternocleidomastoid during the final minute of inspiratory loading. Vascular resistance index (VRI) was calculated. Results: Time to task failure was shorter in HFpEF than controls (339±197 s vs. 626±403 s; p=0.02). Compared to controls, HFpEF patients had a greater increase from baseline in MAP (16±7 vs. 10±6 mmHg) and vastus lateralis VRI (76±45 vs. 32±19%) as well as greater decrease in vastus lateralis %ΔBFI (-32±14 vs. -17±9%) (all, p<0.05). Sternocleidomastoid %ΔBFI normalized to absolute inspiratory pressure was higher in HFpEF compared to controls (8.0±5.0 vs. 4.0±1.9 % per cmH2O·s; p=0.03). Conclusions: These data indicate that patients with HFpEF exhibit exaggerated cardiovascular responses with inspiratory muscle metaboreflex activation compared to controls.

No abstract

Introduction It is well established that the exercise pressor reflex contributes to cardiovascular control (e.g. mean arterial pressure (MAP)) during exercise. One arm of the exercise pressor reflex includes the metabolically sensitive group IV afferents (i.e. metaboreflex). The metaboreflex‐induced cardiovascular responses to exercise are incompletely understood, especially in women across the aging spectrum. For example, post‐menopausal women have greater increases in MAP and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) during locomotor muscle exercise compared to pre‐menopausal women. However, it is unclear if an exaggerated metaboreflex arising from the locomotor muscles is contributing to these cardiovascular adjustments with exercise in post‐menopausal women. We hypothesized that 1) post‐menopausal women will have an augmented MAP response with isolated metaboreflex activation compared to pre‐menopausal women and 2) the exaggerated increase in MAP in the post‐menopausal women will be primarily due to greater increases in SVR. Methods Pre‐ (n= 10, 25±3yrs, 24±3 kg/m2) and post‐menopausal women (n=12, 58±4yrs, 24±3 kg/m2) performed 2 sessions of cycling exercise at 20 W for 5 min with bilateral upper thigh pressure tourniquets inflated to 90 mmHg. At end exercise, the recovery was randomized to post‐exercise circulatory occlusion (PECO) to isolate the metaboreflex (via bilateral upper thigh pressure tourniquets rapidly inflated to suprasystolic pressure for 2 min) or normal recovery (NR) without intervention. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured via manual sphygmomanometry and MAP was calculated. Cardiac output was measured via open circuit acetylene wash‐in and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated. Data is reported as the absolute change from rest to recovery. Results MAP was elevated during PECO compared to NR in both groups (p<0.05), while MAP during PECO was greater in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women (20±9 vs. 13±5 mmHg, respectively) (p<0.05). Similarly, SVR was elevated during PECO compared to NR in both groups (p<0.05), while SVR was greater during PECO in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women (5±3 vs. 3±1 mmHg/L/min, respectively) (p<0.05). In contrast, cardiac output was not different between NR and PECO in either pre‐ (NR: 0.3±1 vs. PECO: −0.2±1 L/min) and post‐menopausal (NR: −0.1±1 vs. PECO: −0.7±0.9 L/min) (all, p>0.05). Conclusion These data demonstrate that isolated metaboreflex stimulation following whole‐body exercise results in exaggerated increases in MAP and SVR in post‐ compared to pre‐menopausal women. These data suggest that exercise pressor reflex‐mediated control of MAP during exercise is accentuated in post‐menopausal women with menopause status.

Reflexes arising from the respiratory and locomotor muscles influence cardiovascular regulation during exercise. However, it is unclear how the respiratory and locomotor muscle reflexes interact when simultaneously stimulated. Herein, we demonstrate that stimulation of the respiratory and locomotor muscle reflexes yielded additive cardiovascular responses during submaximal exercise.

Introduction The exercise pressor reflex contributes to cardiovascular regulation during exercise. The primary components of the exercise pressor reflex response are the mechanically and metabolically sensitive skeletal muscle afferents (group III and IV, respectively). Experimentally, subsystolic regional circulatory occlusion (SubRCO) leads to venous distention, stimulating primarily group III afferents, thereby augmenting the exercise pressor reflex. Previous studies have reported sex differences in the metaboreflex induced exercise pressor reflex induced cardiovascular responses. Specifically, pre‐menopausal women, compared to age‐matched men, were found to have attenuated cardiovascular responses with mechanoreflex stimulation. However, it is unclear if sex differences are also present in the cardiovascular responses during exercise with locomotor limb venous distention. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the influence of SubRCO during submaximal exercise in men and women. We hypothesized that women will have attenuated increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) than men during exercise with SubRCO. Methods Twelve men and thirteen women completed two study visits (Age: M: 30±6vs. W: 27±8yrs, p>0.05; BMI: M: 25.4±3.6 vs. W: 22±3 kg/m2, p<0.05). The first visit consisted of a peak exercise ergometry test. The second visit consisted of constant‐load cycle ergometry at 30% peak workload with different SubRCO pressures via bilateral upper thigh pressure cuffs. The cuffs remained uninflated (0 mmHg) (CTL) during the first three min of exercise, then were intermittently inflated to 20, 40, 60, 80, or 100 mmHg for two minutes (randomized order). Each inflation period was followed by a 2minute deflation period where the participant continued to exercise. Cardiacoutput (Q) and MAP were measured via continuous hemodynamic photoplethysmography and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) was calculated. Data were reported as delta changes from CTL. Results Compared to 0 mmHg, MAP increased with SubRCO inflation pressures of 60, 80, and 100mmHg in men and women during submaximal exercise (all, p<0.05); however, no differences were present between groups (60 mmHg: M: 6.2±4.2 vs. W: 8.0±5.2; 80mmHg: M: 11.6±5.5 vs. W: 15.1±4.8; 100 mmHg: M: 18.2±6.6 vs. W: 20.5±7.2 mmHg(all, p>0.05)). Similarly, SVR increased with cuff inflation pressures of60, 80, and 100 mmHg compared to 0 mmHg in men and women (p<0.05), while no differences existed between groups (60 mmHg: M: 0.3±0.4 vs W: 0.4±0.5;80 mmHg: M: 0.9±0.5 vs W: 1.1± 0.9; 100 mmHg M: 1.3±0.8vs W: 1.5±0.8mmHg/L/min (all, p>0.05)). In contrast, Q did not change with cuff inflation pressures of 20, 40, 60, 80, or100 mmHg compared to 0 mmHg in men or women during submaximal exercise(p>0.05). Conclusion In contrast to our hypothesis, the MAP and SVR responses were not different between men and women with SubRCO during submaximal exercise. Our findings suggest that sex differences are not present in the cardiovascular response to l...