For our AT-MSCs, physiologic saline was superior to DMEM, and storage should not exceed 24 hours.

Table of contentsA1 Hope and despair in the current treatment of nasopharyngeal cancerIB TanI1 NPC international incidence and risk factorsEllen T ChangI2 Familial nasopharyngeal carcinoma and the use of biomarkersChien-Jen Chen, Wan-Lun Hsu, Yin-Chu ChienI3 Genetic susceptibility risk factors for sporadic and familial NPC: recent findingsAllan HildesheimI5 Genetic and environmental risk factors for nasopharyngeal cancer in Southeast AsiaJames D McKay, Valerie Gaborieau, Mohamed Arifin Bin Kaderi, Dewajani Purnomosari, Catherine Voegele, Florence LeCalvez-Kelm, Graham Byrnes, Paul Brennan, Beena DeviI6 Characterization of the NPC methylome identifies aberrant epigenetic disruption of key signaling pathways and EBV-induced gene methylationLi L, Zhang Y, Fan Y, Sun K, Du Z, Sun H, Chan AT, Tsao SW, Zeng YX, Tao QI7 Tumor exosomes and translational research in NPCPierre Busson, Claire Lhuillier, Olivier Morales, Dhafer Mrizak, Aurore Gelin, Nikiforos Kapetanakis, Nadira DelhemI8 Host manipulations of the Epstein-Barr virus EBNA1 proteinSheila Mansouri, Jennifer Cao, Anup Vaidya, and Lori FrappierI9 Somatic genetic changes in EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinomaLo Kwok WaiI10 Preliminary screening results for nasopharyngeal carcinoma with ELISA-based EBV antibodies in Southern ChinaSui-Hong Chen, Jin-lin Du, Ming-Fang Ji, Qi-Hong Huang, Qing Liu, Su-Mei CaoI11 EBV array platform to screen for EBV antibodies associated with NPC and other EBV-associated disordersDenise L. Doolan, Anna Coghill, Jason Mulvenna, Carla Proietti, Lea Lekieffre, Jeffrey Bethony, and Allan HildesheimI12 The nasopharyngeal carcinoma awareness program in IndonesiaRenske Fles, Sagung Rai Indrasari, Camelia Herdini, Santi Martini, Atoillah Isfandiari, Achmad Rhomdoni, Marlinda Adham, Ika Mayangsari, Erik van Werkhoven, Maarten Wildeman, Bambang Hariwiyanto, Bambang Hermani, Widodo Ario Kentjono, Sofia Mubarika Haryana, Marjanka Schmidt, IB TanI13 Current advances and future direction in nasopharyngeal cancer managementBrian O’SullivanI14 Management of juvenile nasopharyngeal cancerEnis OzyarI15 Global pattern of nasopharyngeal cancer: correlation of outcome with access to radiotherapyAnne WM LeeI16 The predictive/prognostic biomarker for nasopharyngeal carcinomaMu-Sheng ZengI17 Effect of HLA and KIR polymorphism on NPC riskXiaojiang Gao, Minzhong Tang, Pat Martin, Yi Zeng, Mary CarringtonI18 Exploring the Association between Potentially Neutralizing Antibodies against EBV Infection and Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaAnna E Coghill, Wei Bu, Hanh Nguyen, Wan-Lun Hsu, Kelly J Yu, Pei-Jen Lou, Cheng-Ping Wang, Chien-Jen Chen, Allan Hildesheim, Jeffrey I CohenI19 Advances in MR imaging in NPCAnn D KingO1 Epstein-Barr virus seromarkers and risk of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: the gene-environment interaction study on nasopharyngeal carcinoma in TaiwanYin-Chu Chien, Wan-Lun Hsu, Kelly J Yu, Tseng-Cheng Chen, Ching-Yuan Lin, Yung-An Tsou, Yi-Shing Leu, Li-Jen Laio, Yen-Liang Chang, Cheng-Ping Wang, Chun-Hun Hua, Ming-Shiang Wu, Chu-Hsing Kate Hsiao, Jehn-Chuan ...

No abstract

Background: Lingual tonsil hypertrophy (LTH) evaluation could be performed by flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy, lateral soft tissue cervical roentgen, CT scan, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Lateral soft tissue cervical roentgen examination was considered as substitutes for diagnostic testing of LTH, which, aside from being cheaper, the examination could also be conducted in all hospitals and easy to be performed on children. Objective: To compare the lingual tonsil enlargement with examination procedure using lateral soft tissue cervical roentgen as an LTH diagnosis measure compared to the flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy examination as the gold standard examination. Methods: A cross-sectional design study on 30 respondents of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) patients whose conducted routine ENT physical examination, followed by flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopy examination along with lateral soft tissue cervical roentgen. Results: The sensitivity level of 65.38% was acquired from the statistical tests, along with specificity level of 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100%, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 30.37%. Conclusions: Based on sensitivity and specificity, lateral soft tissue cervical roentgen examination could already be used as a diagnostic measure and have an accurate capability to diagnose LTH.