No abstract

An Isolated Microgrid (IMG) is an electrical distribution network combined with modern information technologies aiming at reducing costs and pollution to the environment. In this article, we implement the Bacterial Foraging Optimization Algorithm (BFOA) to optimize an IMG model, which includes renewable energy sources, such as wind and solar, as well as a conventional generation unit based on diesel fuel. Two novel versions of the BFOA were implemented and tested: Two-Swim Modified BFOA (TS-MBFOA), and Normalized TS-MBFOA (NTS-MBFOA). In a first experiment, the TS-MBFOA parameters were calibrated through a set of 87 independent runs. In a second experiment, 30 independent runs of both TS-MBFOA and NTS-MBFOA were conducted to compare their performance on minimizing the IMG using the best parameter tuning. Results showed that TS-MBFOA obtained better numerical solutions compared to NTS-MBFOA and LSHADE-CV, an Evolutionary Algorithm, found in the literature. However, the best solution found by NTS-MBFOA is better from a mechatronic point of view because it favors the lifetime of the IMG, resulting in economic savings in the long term.

Menu planning is a process appearing to be straightforward but many complexities arise when it is tried to be solved by computer means. Actually, although there is evidence of previous work since 50 years ago, at present there is no wide know tool which can solve this task in an automated manner. Also, not all proposals deal with full recipes along with considering the user food preferences. In this paper we propose a system architecture based on hybrid optimization: a first module based on mathematical programming, a well known robust approach to this problem; and a second module based on belief merging, a lesser known framework aimed to combine the nutrition scientist advices and policies along with the user food desires. The association of numerical and symbolic approaches will allow us to generate of a more agreeable menu. In order to illustrate our proposal, we present a motivating example detailing the main aspects of the system.

Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS) is a neurological disorder affecting people of any age and sex, mainly damaging the peripheral nervous system. GBS is divided into several subtypes, in which only four are the most common, demanding different treatments. Identifying the subtype is an expensive and time-consuming task. Early GBS detection is crucial to save the patient’s life and not aggravate the disease. This work aims to provide a primary screening tool for GBS subtypes fast and efficiently without complementary invasive methods, based only on clinical variables prospected in consultation, taken from clinical history, and based on risk factors. We conducted experiments with four classifiers with different approaches, five different filters for feature selection, six wrappers, and One versus All (OvA) classification. For the experiments, we used a data set that includes 129 records of Mexican patients and 26 clinical representative variables. Random Forest filter obtained the best results in each classifier for the diagnosis of the four subtypes, in the same way, this filter with the SVM classifier achieved the best result (0.6840). OvA with SVM classifier reached a balanced accuracy of 0.8884 for the Miller-Fisher (MF) subtype.

Nowadays, Machine Learning methods have proven to be highly effective on the identification of various types of diseases, in the form of predictive models. Guillain–Barré syndrome (GBS) is a potentially fatal autoimmune neurological disorder that has barely been studied with computational techniques and few predictive models have been proposed. In a previous study, single classifiers were successfully used to build a predictive model. We believe that a predictive model is imperative to carry out adequate treatment in patients promptly. We designed three classification experiments: (1) using all four GBS subtypes, (2) One versus All (OVA), and (3) One versus One (OVO). These experiments use a real-world dataset with 129 instances and 16 relevant features. Besides, we compare five state-of-the-art ensemble methods against 15 single classifiers with 30 independent runs. Standard performance measures were used to obtain the best classifier in each experiment. Derived from the experiments, we conclude that Random Forest showed the best results in four GBS subtypes classification, no ensemble method stood out over the rest in OVA classification, and single classifiers outperformed ensemble methods in most cases in OVO classification. This study presents a novel predictive model for classification of four subtypes of Guillain–Barré syndrome. Our model identifies the best method for each classification case. We expect that our model could assist specialized physicians as a support tool and also could serve as a basis to improved models in the future.