Chlorophyll a, the major green pigment of the plant world, is certainly the most widespread and conspicuous of organic natural products. Few can be unaware of its decorative function, and all are beneficiaries of its central role in transforming sunlight into substance and sustenance. Yet the fruitful chemical study of this green badge of life did not commence until fairly recent times. For chlorophyll a is a very reactive, sensitive, and complicated substance. Only when, early in this century, the genius of Willstatter applied itself to the problem, were the first sure steps taken. That great investigator isolated the pigment-and its closely related frequent minor concomitant chlorophyll b as well-in the pure state, established correctly the empirical formula of the substance, and laid down a sound and extensive preliminary basis of transformation and degradation. These achievements can be measured against the fact that the isolation of chlorophyll in a state of purity is even now, after more than fifty years, no mean feat, and, further, that the empirical formula defined by Willstatter, repeatedly called into question by subsequent investigators, has stood the test of time. For some period after this solid foundation had been laid by Willstatter there was little activity until three new groups took the field late in the 1920s. Stoll, who had played a prominent role in the early studies as a collaborator of Willstatter, took up the work anew, and made important contributions, as did Conant in the United States. But by far the greatest contribution was made by Hans Fischer and his collaborators at Munich. Fresh from his dramatic conquest of the blood pigment, Fischer hurled his legions into the attack on chlorophyll, and during a period of approximately fifteen years, built a monumental corpus of fact. As this chemical record, almost unique in its scope and depth, was constructed, the molecule was transformed and rent asunder in innumerable directions, and the fascination and intricacy of the chemistry of chlorophyll and its congeners was fully revealed. These massive contributions were crowned by the proposal, in 1940, of a structure which was complete except for stereochemical detail. Finally, in a series of elegant investigations completed only during the last few years, Linstead and his associates at Imperial College were able to solve the stereochemical problem and to provide definitive confirmatory detail in respect of the number and disposition of saturated carbon atoms within the nuclear framework. Half a century of structural study had culminated in the complete formula (I) for chlorophyll aI, 8. Our active interest in chlorophyll was initiated four years ago, in 1956. The first questions we asked were very general ones. The structural investigations had been carried out almost entirely during the twilight of the classical period of organic chemistry. Only the very simplest basic * A brief communication recording the results on which this lecture is based has appeared in
Chlorophyll a, the major green pigment of the plant world, is certainly the most widespread and conspicuous of organic natural products. Few can be unaware of its decorative function, and all are beneficiaries of its central role in transforming sunlight into substance and sustenance. Yet the fruitful chemical study of this green badge of life did not commence until fairly recent times. For chlorophyll a is a very reactive, sensitive, and complicated substance. Only when, early in this century, the genius of Willstatter applied itself to the problem, were the first sure steps taken. That great investigator isolated the pigment-and its closely related frequent minor concomitant chlorophyll b as well-in the pure state, established correctly the empirical formula of the substance, and laid down a sound and extensive preliminary basis of transformation and degradation. These achievements can be measured against the fact that the isolation of chlorophyll in a state of purity is even now, after more than fifty years, no mean feat, and, further, that the empirical formula defined by Willstatter, repeatedly called into question by subsequent investigators, has stood the test of time. For some period after this solid foundation had been laid by Willstatter there was little activity until three new groups took the field late in the 1920s. Stoll, who had played a prominent role in the early studies as a collaborator of Willstatter, took up the work anew, and made important contributions, as did Conant in the United States. But by far the greatest contribution was made by Hans Fischer and his collaborators at Munich. Fresh from his dramatic conquest of the blood pigment, Fischer hurled his legions into the attack on chlorophyll, and during a period of approximately fifteen years, built a monumental corpus of fact. As this chemical record, almost unique in its scope and depth, was constructed, the molecule was transformed and rent asunder in innumerable directions, and the fascination and intricacy of the chemistry of chlorophyll and its congeners was fully revealed. These massive contributions were crowned by the proposal, in 1940, of a structure which was complete except for stereochemical detail. Finally, in a series of elegant investigations completed only during the last few years, Linstead and his associates at Imperial College were able to solve the stereochemical problem and to provide definitive confirmatory detail in respect of the number and disposition of saturated carbon atoms within the nuclear framework. Half a century of structural study had culminated in the complete formula (I) for chlorophyll aI, 8. Our active interest in chlorophyll was initiated four years ago, in 1956. The first questions we asked were very general ones. The structural investigations had been carried out almost entirely during the twilight of the classical period of organic chemistry. Only the very simplest basic * A brief communication recording the results on which this lecture is based has appeared in
( S )‐8a‐Methyl‐3,4,8,8a‐Tetrahydro‐1,6(2 H , 7 H )‐Naphthalenedione product: (S)‐8a‐Methyl‐3,4,8,8a‐Tetrahydro‐1,6(2H, 7H)‐Naphthalenedione intermediate: 2‐methyl‐2‐(3‐oxobutyl)‐1,3‐cyclohexanedione reactant: 2‐Methyl‐1,3‐cyclohexanedione reactant: Methyl vinyl ketone, bp 34°C/120 mm
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.