No abstract

Pain sensitivity is correlated to blood pressure levels whereas the parental history of hypertension per se does not affect the pain perception pattern. Thus, the degree of blood pressure elevation, more than a genetic predisposition to hypertension may influence the mechanisms leading to hypalgesia in hypertension.

Abstract-The cardiovascular system shares numerous anatomic and functional pathways with the antinociceptive network. The aim of this study was to investigate whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor treatment could affect hypertension-related hypalgesia. Twenty-five untreated hypertensive patients, together with a control group of 14 normotensive subjects, underwent dental pain perception evaluation by means of a pulpar test (graded increase of test current applied to healthy teeth). After the evaluation of the dental pain threshold (occurrence of pulp sensation) and tolerance (time when the subjects asked for the test to be stopped), all the subjects underwent a 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. The hypertensive group then was treated with 20 mg/d enalapril, whereas the normotensive subjects remained without any treatment. After a time interval of 6Ϯ2 months, the dental pain sensitivity was retested in all the subjects, and ambulatory blood pressure was recorded during treatment in the hypertensive patients. At the first assessment, hypertensive patients showed a higher pain threshold than normotensive subjects (PϽ.001). On retesting of pain sensitivity in hypertensive patients, a significant decrease of both pain threshold and tolerance, leading to their normalization, was observed during treatment (PϽ.001 and PϽ.005, respectively), in the presence of reduced 24-hour and office blood pressure values. A slight, though significant, correlation was observed between variations in pain tolerance and baseline blood pressure changes occurring during treatment. During follow-up, the normotensive subjects did not show any significant pain perception or office blood pressure changes. Hypertension-related hypalgesia was confirmed. Mechanisms acting both through lowering of blood pressure and specific pharmacodynamic properties may account for the normalization of pain sensitivity observed in hypertensive patients during treatment with ACE inhibitors. (Hypertension. 1998;31:1146-1150.)

The correlation between both baseline and 24 h blood pressure and pain perception has been confirmed in a large group study of normotensive and hypertensive subjects. Moreover, even among the hypertensive range of blood pressure, the higher the blood pressure is, the lower the sensitivity to pain is. These findings strengthen the hypothesis of a role of the degree of blood pressure elevation in modulating pain sensitivity.

IntroductionOral Anticoagulation therapy (OAC) is highly effective in the management of thromboembolic disorders. An adequate level of knowledge is important for self-management and optimizing clinical outcomes. The Anticoagulation Knowledge Tool (AKT) was developed to assess OAC knowledge and caters for both patients prescribed direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonist (VKA). However, evidence regarding its psychometric proprieties, validity and reliability are unavailable in non-English speaking settings. For this reason, the aim of this study is to provide further evidence of validity for AKT and also developing an Italian AKT version (I-AKT) supported by evidence of validity and reliability.MethodsA multiphase study was conducted which included the following: cultural and linguistic validity; i.e. content validity; construct validity; reliability assessment. The Construct validity was performed using the contrasted group approach using three groups comprised of health care providers, patients and the general public. Furthermore, Exploratory Structural Equation Modelling (ESEM) was performed to confirm the mono-dimensional structure of the items in the AKT.ResultsIn construct validity phase 334 participants were enrolled. One-way ANOVA and post hoc analysis test demonstrated significant differences between the means knowledge scores of the three groups: 30.42±3.04 vs 23.45± 4.57 vs14.32±6.07 (Statistic F = 266.83; p < .001). ESEM analysis demonstrates the I-AKT mono-dimensionally structure with an explained variance of 56.42%. The scale also showed both good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach’s α = 0.896) and test-retest reliability (r = 0.855).ConclusionThis study developed and validated I-AKT with supporting evidence for validity and reliability. The study also confirms the mono-dimensional of the items in the AKT. This suggest that the instrument can be useful in non-English setting for knowledge assessment and in potentially developing patient education materials.