We have shown that it is feasible to perform penile transplantation with excellent results. Furthermore, this experience demonstrates that penile transplantation can be successfully performed with conventional immunosuppression. We propose that our successful penile transplantation pilot experience represents a proof of concept for an evolution in reconstructive transplantation.

Vital, genetically engineered porcine skin transplants have long been regarded as a promising treatment option for severe burn wounds. The objective of this two-part, preclinical study was to evaluate the ability of vital, split-thickness skin xenotransplants derived from designated pathogen-free, alpha 1,3 galactosyltransferase knockout miniature swine to provide temporary wound closure of full-thickness wound defects intended to model severe and extensive, deep partial- and full-thickness burn wounds. In part 1 of the study, four full-thickness wound defects were introduced in four cynomolgus macaques recipients and, then engrafted with two xenografts and two allografts to achieve temporary wound closure. On POD-15, autografts were used to achieve definitive wound closure and were observed until POD-22. In part 2 of the study, four additional subjects each received two full-thickness wound defects, followed by two xenografts to achieve temporary wound closure, and were observed postoperatively for 30 days without further intervention. All grafts were assessed for signs of adherence to the wound bed, vascularity, and signs of immune rejection via gross clinical and histological methods. Xenograft and allograft comparators were equivalent in part 1, and later autografts were otherwise indistinguishable. In part 2, all xenotransplants demonstrated adherence, vascularity, and survival until POD-30. These were unexpected results that exceed previously published findings in similar models. Furthermore, the ensuing GLP-study report directly supported regulatory clearance, permitting a phase I clinical trial. This solution holds great promise as an alternative to human cadaver allograft, the current standard of care for the treatment of severe burns.

Objective The clinical use of frozen, human allogeneic skin grafts is considered a suitable alternative to freshly harvested allogeneic skin grafts when the latter are not available. However, limited functional and histologic information exists regarding the effects of cryopreservation on allogeneic skin grafts, especially those across mismatched histocompatibility barriers. Thus, we performed a side-by-side comparative study of fresh vs. frozen skin grafts, across both minor and major histocompatibility barriers, in a miniature swine model. Since porcine skin shares many physical and immunologic properties with human skin, our findings have relevance to current clinical practices involving allogeneic grafting, and may support future, temporary wound therapies involving frozen xenografts, comprised of genetically modified porcine skin. Methods Four miniature swine underwent harvest and grafting of split thickness skin, with and without cryopreservation, in order to observe autologous grafts and grafts across minor and major histocompatibility barriers. Grafts were biopsied at regular intervals for study of architecture, vascularization, and outcomes. Results All grafts vascularized without technical complications. Differences were noted in the early appearance of some fresh vs. frozen grafts but no significant difference was observed in overall survival times in any of the experimental groups. Conclusion These results demonstrate that despite early observable differences in the healing process, cryopreservation and thawing does not significantly affect long-term graft survival or time to rejection, thus supporting the clinical and experimental use of fresh and frozen split thickness skin grafts as comparable and interchangeable.

Background: Allogeneic skin recovered from human deceased donors (HDD) has been a mainstay interim treatment for severe burns, but unfortunately risk of infectious disease and availability limitations exist. Genetically engineered ɑ-1,3 galactosyltransferase knockout (GalT-KO) porcine source animals for viable skin xenotransplants may provide a promising clinical alternative. Methods: Four cynomolgus macaque recipients received full-thickness surgical wounds to model the defects arising from excision of full-thickness burn injury and were treated with biologically active skin xenotransplants derived from GalT-KO, Designated Pathogen Free (DPF) miniature swine. Evaluations were conducted for safety, tolerability, and recipient immunological response. Results: All skin xenotransplants demonstrated prolonged survival, vascularity, and persistent dermal adhesion until the study endpoint at post-operative day 30. No adverse outcomes were observed during the study. Varying levels of epidermolysis coincided with histologic detection of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and other cellular infiltrates in the epidermis. Recipient sera IgM and IgG demonstrated significant antibody immune response to non-α-1,3-galactose porcine xenoantigens. Separately, specific wound healing mediators were quantified. Neither porcine cell migration nor PERV were detected in circulation or any visceral organs. Conclusions: These results provide a detailed analysis of vital skin xenotransplants utilizing a non-human primate model to predict the anticipated immunological response of human patients. The lack of adverse rejection even in the presence of elevated Ig indicates this is a prospective therapeutic option. The findings reported here directly supported regulatory clearance for a first-in-man, Phase I xenotransplantation clinical trial.