No abstract

In 2018, the social movement against Prime Minister Serzh Sargsyan in Armenia shocked analysts, a substantial of whom believe that this series of movements can be thought of as a revolution, a revolution as the complete end of the Soviet elements in Armenia. According to Goldstone’s revolution doctrine, the causes of this revolution and further understanding the process of the revolution could be more distinct. Furthermore, remember what Goldstone agrees - do not use theory to rigidly set historical facts, but use historical facts to construct theories (Stinchcombe, 1978), based on the facts of the Armenian revolution, some theoretical explanations may need to be discarded, or new researchers will also develop new theories during the issues of explaining the Armenian revolution.

The purpose of the presented research was to identify the basic value characteristics and potentially conflicting contradictions as a result of the influence of the rapid spread of new media on the audience of modern Russian youth. The first part of the article problematizes the search for theoretical grounds for studying the virtual projection of politics, the methodological background of research on the specifics of the phenomenon of the mediatization of politics. Considering the mediatization effects in the riskological projection, the authors pay special attention to the value attitudes of perception of information about threats, the ideological dominants of the features of political reactions of various social strata. This research aims to contribute to the Russian academic discourse on the specifics of youth media activism, models and practices of its media consumption, new forms and parameters of communication, "digital aborigines". It is concluded that in the conditions of media conflicts, the system of "traditional" values is being desacrated, the struggle of real political interests and parallel/alternative political agendas is taking place, which affects the value political activity of young people and the processes of their self-identification. In the course of the analysis, a fundamentally new knowledge was obtained, based on a holistic vision of the cultural and historical reality of the formation of a "digital society" in Russia, about the axiological features of the modern Russian social order, including a complexly structured set of moral values of youth, the dominant discourses of the value system and ways of alternative vision of the political situation and images of threats and conflicts. The paper examines the "conflict of selection of social problems" in the media communication youth space, algorithms and mechanisms of the clash of beliefs on digital platforms, analyzes media conflicts about the political past and present. In this regard, the article develops a model for measuring and preventing the risks of political and axiological transformations among Russian youth based on the development of complementary methods of their assessment for the construction and implementation of effective state strategies in terms of their change and improvement.

The main goal of the presented study is to analyze the features of the development of state youth policy in the Russian Federation in the context of digitalization. The authors start from the modern understanding of the foundations of social audit as a critical analysis of the efficiency of modern youth policy through the study of mechanisms and methods, processes of constituting meanings and gaining the rights of young people to self-realization and social innovation, achieving a conflict balance of their expectations with institutional norms and resources. As the main theoretical tool for auditing the efficiency of youth policy in the digital environment, the potential of a risk-reflexive approach to assessing interactions and conflict/cooperation between society and the state in generational optics is used. The ideas of risk-reflexive management are considered as a normative basis for focusing the audit of youth policy not only on institutions and organizational structures, but above all on values and meanings. The audit of youth policy is disclosed in the article as a check for the compliance of its goals and methods with the tasks of youth socialization, its adaptation in a risky society in the context of global information confrontation and risk assessment. The article proposes a risk-reflexive interpretation of the criteria for the efficiency of strategic management in the field of youth policy implementation (productivity, security, development, satisfaction). Based on the analysis of the social capital concept, its “triad” (trust, cultural norms and social networks) and forms, the article reveals the specific features of strategies for young people to choose models of response to social and political problems, proposes an original classification of youth policy using “bonding” and “bridging” types.