No abstract

No abstract

Because of the development in computational resources, Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) has assumed increasing importance in recent years as a tool for predicting the consequences of accidents in petrochemical and process industries. CFD has also been used more and more for explosion predictions for input to risk assessments and design load specifications. The CFD software FLACS has been developed and experimentally validated continuously for more than 25 years. As a result, it is established as a tool for simulating hydrocarbon gas deflagrations with reasonable precision and is widely used in petrochemical industry and elsewhere. In recent years the focus on predicting hydrogen explosions has increased, and with the latest release the validation status for hydrogen deflagrations is considered good. However, in many of these scenarios, especially involving reactive gases such as hydrogen, deflagration to detonation transition (DDT) may be a significant threat. In previous work, FLACS was extended to identify whether DDT is likely in a given scenario and indicate the regions where it might occur. The likelihood of DDT has been expressed in terms of spatial pressure gradients across the flame front. This parameter is able to visualize when the flame front captures the pressure front, which is the case in situations when fast deflagrations transition to detonation. Reasonable agreement was obtained with experimental observations in terms of explosion pressures, transition times, and flame speeds. The DDT model has now been extended to develop a more meaningful criterion for estimating the likelihood of DDT by comparison of the geometric dimensions with the detonation cell size. This article discusses the new models to predict DDT, and compare predictions with relevant experiments. © 2007 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Process Saf Prog 2008

No abstract

a b s t r a c tTo be able to perform proper consequence modelling as a part of a risk assessment, it is essential to be able to model the physical processes well. Simplified tools for dispersion and explosion predictions are generally not very useful. CFD tools have the potential to model the relevant physics and predict well, but without proper user guidelines based on extensive validation work, very mixed prediction capability can be expected. In this article, recent dispersion validation effort for the CFD tool FLACS-HYDROGEN is presented. A range of different experiments is simulated, including low-momentum releases in a garage, subsonic jets in a garage with stratification effects and subsequent slow diffusion, low momentum and subsonic horizontal jets influenced by buoyancy, and free jets from high-pressure vessels. LH 2 releases are also considered. Some of the simulations are performed as blind predictions.