Background Connective tissue disease increases the risk of lung cancer, but whether rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has an effect on the overall survival (OS) rate in this population has not been well studied. Methods Patients diagnosed with lung cancer between January 2015 and December 2017 were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the baseline of the two groups, whereas the differences between patients with and without RA were compared using survival analysis. Further, the effects of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and qi deficiency on survival in cases of RA with lung cancer were examined. Cox regression analysis was applied to predict the factors that influenced the survival of lung cancer to one year. Results Overall, 154 lung cancer patients, including 136 (88.3%) without RA and 18 (11.7%) with RA, were included. Two comparison cohorts were matched by 1:2 propensity score matching, which yielded 18 lung cancer patients with RA and 36 lung cancer patients without RA. Ultimately, the survival prognosis of lung cancer and RA was worse than that without RA, that of patients with ILD with RA and lung cancer was worse than that among those without RA, and that of patients with qi deficiency with RA and lung cancer was worse than that among those without RA. Conclusions The survival prognosis of lung cancer patients with RA is worse than that of those without RA. ILD and qi deficiency promote reduced survival when found in conjunction with RA in patients with lung cancer.

Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment for the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can improve clinical symptoms, but it is not clear whether it can shorten viral shedding. This is an observational study including 97 patients with COVID-19 who were consecutively admitted to the Jiangxia Fangcang hospital in Wuhan (Hubei, China) from January 15, 2020, to March 10, 2020. All patients were treated with TCM, and we assessed the patients daily and collected clinical information via a diary card. The primary endpoint was the time to achieve a negative result for severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) RT-PCR. The final analysis included 92 patients. The median time to negative oropharyngeal swab for all the participants was 22 days (IQR 15–30). The participants were divided into three groups according to time from symptom onset to start of TCM treatment: within 7 days group (early treatment group), 8–14 days group (middle treatment group), and over 14 days group (late treatment group). The median time to negative oropharyngeal swab for the early treatment group was 14 days (IQR 12–17) and for the middle and late treatment groups was statistically shorter than 20 days (IQR 18–22) and 30 days (IQR 25–34), respectively. In univariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the incidence of negative oropharyngeal swab for the early and middle treatment groups was 7.674 times and 3.609 times statistically higher than the late treatment group, respectively; whereas in multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, the incidence for the early and middle treatment groups was 18.093 times and 5.804 times statistically higher than the late treatment group, respectively. In patients with moderate COVID-19, those who had no cough, no dyspnea, and those who received TCM treatment earlier could achieve nucleic acid negative sooner by shortening viral shedding.