Previous studies from our laboratory showed that B 10.A mice are high responders to pigeon cytochrome c fragment 81-104, whereas B 10.A(5R) mice are low responders. In the present studies, the C-terminal cyanogen bromide cleavage fragment and homologous synthetic peptides of tobacco horn worm moth cytochrome c were shown to be immunogenic in both B10.A and B10.A(5R) mice. These strains, however, showed different patterns of cross-reactivity when immune lymph node T cells were stimulated with cytochrome c fragments from other species. To examine the two patterns of responsiveness at a clonal level, cytochrome c fragment-specific T cell hybridomas were made and found to secrete interleukin 2 in response to antigen. The patterns of cross- reactivity of these B 10.A and B 10.A(5R) clones were similar to that seen in the whole lymph node population. Surprisingly, when these clones were tested for major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-restricted antigen recognition, they were all found to respond to antigen with both B10.A and B10.A(5R) antigen-presenting cells (APC). Furthermore, the cross-reactivity pattern appeared to be largely determined by the genotype of the APC, not the genotype of the T cell clone. That is, a given T cell clone displayed a different fine specificity when assayed with B10.A or B10.A(5R) APC. This observation indicates that the APC MHC gene product and antigen interact during the stimulation of the T cell response and that as a consequence the specificity of antigen-induced T cell activation is influenced by these MHC gene products. (During the preparation of this manuscript it has come to our attention that results similar to our own, concerning the fine specificity of cytotoxic T cell clones, have been obtained by Dr. T. R. Hunig and Dr. M. J. Bevan, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, MA. T. R. Hunig and M. J. Bevan. 1981. Specificity of T-cell clones illustrates altered self hypothesis. Nature. 294:460.)
In this report we have examined the ability of small resting B cells to act as antigen-presenting cells (APC) to antigen-specific MHC-restricted T cells as assessed by either T cell proliferation or T cell-dependent B cell stimulation. We found that 10 of 14 in vitro antigen-specific MHC-restricted T cell clones and lines and three of four T cell hybridomas could be induced to either proliferate or secrete IL-2 in the presence of lightly irradiated (1,000 rads) purified B cells and the appropriate foreign antigen. All T cell lines and hybridomas were stimulated to proliferate or make IL-2 by macrophage- and dendritic cell-enriched populations and all T cells tested except one hybridoma caused B cell activation when stimulated with B cells as APC. Furthermore, lightly irradiated, highly purified syngeneic B cells were as potent a source of APC for inducing B cell activation as were low density dendritic and macrophage-enriched cells. Lymph node T cells freshly taken from antigen-primed animals were also found to proliferate when cultured with purified B cells and the appropriate antigen. Thus, small resting B cells can function as APC to a variety of T cells. This APC function was easily measured when the cells were irradiated with 1,000 rads, but was greatly diminished or absent when they were irradiated with 3,300 rads. Thus, the failure of some other laboratories to observe this phenomenon may be the result of the relative radiosensitivity of the antigen-presenting function of the B cells. In addition, this radiosensitivity allowed us to easily distinguish B cell antigen presentation from presentation by the dendritic cell and macrophage, as the latter was resistant to 3,300 rads. Finally, one T cell clone that failed to proliferate when B cells were used as APC was able to recruit allogeneic B cells to proliferate in the presence of syngeneic B cells and the appropriate antigen. This result suggests that there are at least two distinct pathways of activation in T cells, one that leads to T cell proliferation and one that leads to the secretion of B cell recruitment factor(s).
Insulin receptors have been demonstrated on mononuclear leukocytes prepared by centrifugation of buffy coats from normal blood donors on Ficoll-Hypaque gradients. The cell type that specifically binds insulin in this mixture of lymphocytes and monocytes has never been clearly identified, although it was assumed to be the lymphocyte since this cell constitutes about 80%/c of the population. In the present studies, insulin-binding assays were performed on the mononuclear leukocyte preparation before and 'after selective depletion or enrichment for monocytes using glass wool or Sephadex G-10 adherence columns. The amount of 'l25-labeled insulin specifically bound correlated significantly with the number of monocytes but not with the number of B or T lymphocytes.Approximately 90% of the specific insulin binding of this preparation could be accounted for by its content of monocytes. The amount of binding was unaffected by phagocytosis of latex particles or by metabolic inhibitors added to prevent endocytosis. Autoradiograms made on smears of whole peripheral blood and mononuclear leukocytes demonstrated that all of the cells that bound '251-labeled insulin were large mononuclear cells, 85-90%7 of which could be identified as monocytes by morphological criteria or by the functional criterion of latex particle ingestion. Since insulin receptor concentration may be altered in disease states in man, it is essential, when using this cell population for detecting such changes, to quantitate the number of monocytes in the preparation so that the insulin-binding data can be appropriately interpreted.Previous studies by Gavin, Archer, and their coworkers (1)(2)(3)(4) demonstrated that bone marrow-derived (B) lymphoblastoid cell lines maintained in continuous culture and peripheral blood mononuclear leukocytes from normal blood donors purified by Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation contain receptors for insulin. In the latter case, it was assumed that the binding was to receptors on lymphocytes, which comprise the majority of this population. However, a subsequent study by Krug et al. (5) failed to detect any significant insulin binding to peripheral blood lymphocytes purified by passage over tightly packed nylon wool. Since this separation procedure has recently been shown to remove B lymphocytes (6-9), it was Abbreviations: B and T lymphocytes, bone marrow-derived and thymus-derived lymphocytes, respectively.
A series of experiments were performed to explore the role of complementing major histocompatability complex (MHC)-linked immune response Ir genes in the murine T cell proliferative response to the globular protein antigen pigeon cytochrome c. The functional equivalence of I-E-subregion-encoded, structurally homologous E(a) chains from different haplotypes bearing the serologic specificity Ia.7 was demonstrated by the complementation for high responsiveness to pigeon cytochrome c of F(1) hybrids between low responder B 10.A(4R) (I-A (k)) or B 10.S (I-A(8)) mice and four low responder E(a)- bearing haplotypes. Moreover, this Ir gene function correlated directly with both the ability of antigen-pulsed spleen cells from these same F(1) strains to stimulate pigeon cytochrome c-primed T cells from B10.A or B10.S(9R) mice, and with the cell surface expression of the two-chain Ia antigenic complex, A(e):E(a), bearing the conformational or combinatorial determinant recognized by the monoclonal anti-Ia antibody, Y-17. The B 10.PL strain (H-2(u)), which expresses an Ia.7-positive I-E- subregion-encoded E(a) chain, failed to complement with B10.A(4R) or B10.S mice in the response to pigeon cytochrome c. However, (B10.A(4R) × B10.PL)F(1) and (B10.S × B10.PL)F(1) mice do express A(k)(e):E(u)(a) and A(8)(e):E(u)(a) on their cell surface, although in reduced amounts relative to A(k,s)(e):E(k,d,p,r)(a) complexes found in corresponding F(1) strains. This quantitative difference in Ia antigen expression correlated with a difference in the ability to present pigeon cytochrome c to B 10.A and B 10.S(9R) long-term T cell lines. Thus, (B10.A(4R) × B10.PL)F(1) spleen cells required a 10-fold higher antigen dose to induce the same stimulation as (B10.A(4R) × B10.D2)F(1) spleen cells. In addition, the monoclonal antibody, Y-17, which reacts with A(e):E(a) molecules of several strains, had a greater inhibitory effect on the proliferative response to pigeon cytochrome c of B10.A T cells in the presence of (B10.A(4R) X B10.PL)F(1) spleen cells than in the presence of (B10.A(4R) X B10.D2)F(1) spleen cells. These functional data, in concert with the biochemical and serological data in the accompanying report, are consistent with the molecular model for Ir gene complementation in which appropriate two-chain Ia molecules function at the antigen-presenting cell (APC) surface as restriction elements. Moreover, they clearly demonstrate that the magnitude of the T cell proliferative response is a function of both the concentration of nominal antigen and of the amount of Ia antigen expressed on the APC. Finally, the direct correlation of a quantitative deficiency in cell surface expression of an Ia antigen with a corresponding relative defect in antigen-presenting function provides strong independent evidence that the I-region-encoded Ia antigens are the products of the MHC-linked Ir genes.
A system has been described that produces a murine syngeneic mixed lymphocyte response (MLR) comparable in magnitude to an allogeneic MLR. The responder cells in these cultures exhibit the classic immunologic characteristics of both memory and specificity. Studies using radiation-induced bone marrow chimeras of F(1) {arrow} parent type indicated that, similar to many other T cell-mediated immune responses, the response of the T lymphocytes in the syngeneic MLR was major histocompatibility complex-restricted and was determined by the environment in which the T cells matured. Using responder T cells from F(1) {arrow} parent chimeras and stimulator cells from H-2 recombinant strains, it was possible to map the genes involved in the stimulation to the K and/or I regions. In addition, blocking studies with monoclonal anti-Ia antibodies suggested that in the B10.A strain the critical molecules were products of both the I-A(k) and I-E(k) subregions. The issue of whether the syngeneic MLR is directed solely at self I-region antigens or whether the response represents proliferation to an unknown antigen in association with self I-region determinants was also addressed. Secondary syngeneic MLR were successfully performed in normal mouse serum and with stimulator cells prepared in the absence of bovine serum albumin to rule out the possibility that xenogeneic serum antigens were involved in the stimulation. The possibility that the syngeneic MLR might represent a secondary response to environmental antigens was eliminated by using germ- free mice as a source of stimulator cells and by demonstrating that spleen cells from unimmunized, fully allogeneic chimeras (B10.A {arrow} B10) could generate a normal syngeneic MLR even though such chimeras could not be primed to respond to any foreign antigens unless supplemented in vivo with a source of antigen-presenting cells syngeneic to the B10 host. The possibility that the syngeneic MLR was a primary response to a foreign antigen was considered unlikely because by using our culture conditions we could not obtain a primary antigen response or a secondary antigen response after in vitro priming to a variety of potent foreign antigens. Finally, the possibility that the syngeneic MLR represents a response to a variety of minor histocompatibility self antigens in association with self Ia molecules was eliminated by showing that the secondary responses to H-2 compatible, non-H-2 different strain (A/J vs. B10.A and C3H, or BALB/c vs. B10.D2 and DBA/2) were comparable to the secondary responses to syngeneic stimulators. Thus, we conclude that the target antigens in the syngeneic MLR are solely determinants on self Ia molecules, although the functionally equivalent possibility of a single, nonpolymorphic, minor self antigen seen in association with self Ia molecules cannot be excluded.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.