The purpose of this article was to evaluate socioeconomic and demographic indicators, reproductive health, use of prenatal, childbirth, and neonatal services, and anthropometric data for mothers and infants. The authors performed a cross-sectional analysis of a systematic sample of 2,831 hospital births in São Luís, Maranhão State, from March 1997 to February 1998 at ten public and private maternity hospitals. The sample was stratified proportionally according to the number of births in each maternity hospital. Mothers answered a standard questionnaire. Of the total, 97.9% were live births and 98% were singletons. Prenatal coverage was 89.5%, and prevalence of cesarean sections was 33.8%. A physician provided prenatal care in 75.7% of cases and performed 73.8% of the deliveries. The Unified Health System covered the costs of 76.4% of the prenatal visits and 89.7% of the deliveries. A pediatrician was present in the delivery room in 50.2% of cases. The low birth weight rate was 9.6% and the preterm birth rate 13.9%. Reasons for concern included a high percentage of adolescent mothers, single mothers (or without partners), the high cesarean rate, and the high percentage of births attended by unqualified personnel.

Acesso e utilização dos serviços na Estratégia Saúde da Família na perspectiva dos gestores, profissionais e usuáriosAccess to and use of the services of the family health strategy from the perspective of managers, professionals and usersResumo Utilizaram-se questionários adaptados à realidade brasileira (PCATool) para avaliar acesso e utilização dos serviços, aplicados a 30 gestores, 80 profissionais e amostra aleatória de 882 usuários da Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF) em São Luís. Diferenças entre as avaliações dos 3 tipos de entrevistados foram identificadas pelo teste de KruskallWallis e pós-teste de Dunn. Usuários tiveram dificuldades no acesso e na utilização dos serviços, também considerados insatisfatórios pelos gestores e profissionais. O acesso foi a dimensão pior avaliada e o não funcionamento das unidades após as 18 horas e finais de semana foram suas principais dificuldades. A avaliação dos gestores e profissionais quase sempre divergiu com a dos usuários, sendo a avaliação dos gestores predominantemente mais favorável. Gratuidade, utilização de serviços preventivos e da ESF antes das consultas especializadas foram bem avaliadas. O funcionamento das unidades precisa se adequar às necessidades dos usuários, principalmente dos trabalhadores. Fortalecer a participação social na gestão local da ESF pode ajudar a identificar essas necessidades, dirimindo divergências entre os atores estudados. Palavras-chave Programa Saúde da Família, Atenção Primária, Avaliação em Saúde Abstract Questionnaires adapted to the Brazilian reality (Primary Care Assessment Tool) to evaluate access to and use of services were distributed to 30 managers, 80 professionals and a random sample of 882 Family Health Strategy (FHS) users in São Luís in the state of Maranhão. The differences between the evaluations of managers, professionals and users were identified by the Kruskal-Wallis test and Dunn's post test. Users faced difficulties in access to and use of the services, which were also considered unsatisfactory by managers and professionals. Access was the dimension with the worst evaluation, and non-functioning of units after 6 p.m. and at weekends were the main difficulties. The evaluations of the managers and professionals were almost always divergent from those of the users, with the evaluation of the managers being more favorable. The fact that the service was free of charge, the use of preventive services and the FHS services before the specialized care were well evaluated. The operation of units should attend users' needs, especially that of the working population. Strengthening social participation in local management of the FHS may assist in identifying these needs, thereby reducing the divergent opinions of the players involved.

1 Prevalência e fatores associados ao uso de drogas ilícitas em gestantes da coorte BRISA Prevalence of illicit drug use and associated factors during pregnancy in the BRISA cohort Prevalencia y factores asociados con el uso de drogas ilegales en el embarazo en la cohorte BRISA

Resumo ObjetivoVerificar a concordância entre as informações constantes no Sistema de Informação sobre Nascidos Vivos (Sinasc) referentes a partos hospitalares e aquelas obtidas por inquérito seccional (padrão-ouro). Métodos Realizou-se inquérito por amostragem em 2.831 partos hospitalares ocorridos em dez maternidades do município de São Luís, MA, abrangendo cerca de 98% dos nascimentos hospitalares da cidade. O arquivo do Sinasc foi comparado com os dados do inquérito perinatal após a realização de linkage por programa de computador. Foram analisados: a cobertura estimada do Sinasc em relação aos nascimentos hospitalares verificados, o percentual de informação ignorada ou não preenchida e o grau de concordância entre as informações constantes no arquivo do Sinasc com o arquivo perinatal. Na medida da concordância, foram utilizados o indicador "kappa", no caso de variáveis qualitativas, e a correlação intraclasse, em se tratando de variáveis quantitativas. Resultados A cobertura estimada do Sinasc foi de 75,8% (IC95%; 73,3%-78,2%). Os campos do Sinasc que apresentaram boa confiabilidade foram: peso ao nascer, sexo, hospital de nascimento, tipo de parto e idade materna. As estimativas do baixo peso ao nascer foram semelhantes nas duas pesquisas e a concordância foi alta (kappa=0,94). Entretanto, a prematuridade foi mais alta no inquérito (11,2%) do que no Sinasc (1,7%), e a concordância foi baixa (kappa=0,09). Conclusão A cobertura estimada do Sinasc foi baixa. A análise do arquivo do Sinasc mostrou que a cobertura estimada foi baixa; a taxa de baixo peso ao nascer parece ter boa validade e reprodutibilidade; e a taxa de prematuridade está subestimada.

BackgroundOver the last decades there has been a reduction of social inequalities in Brazil, as well as a strong expansion of health services, including prenatal care. The objective of the present study was to estimate the rate of inadequate prenatal care utilization and its associated factors in São Luís, Brazil, in 2010 and to determine whether there was a reduction of inequity in prenatal care use by comparing the present data to those obtained from a previous cohort started in 1997/98.MethodsData from the BRISA (Brazilian birth cohort studies of Ribeirão Preto and São Luís) population-based cohort, which started in 2010 (5067 women), were used. The outcome variable was the inadequate utilization of prenatal care, classified according to the recommendations of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. The explanatory variables were organized into three hierarchical levels based on the Andersen’s behavioral model of the use of health services: predisposing, enabling and need factors.ResultsOnly 2.0% of the women did not attend at least one prenatal care visit. The rate of inadequate prenatal care utilization was 36.7%. Despite an improved adequacy of prenatal care use from 47.3% in 1997/98 to 58.2% in 2010, social inequality persisted: both low maternal schooling (prevalence ratio (PR) = 2.78; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 2.23-3.47 for 0 to 4 years of study) and low family income, less than 0.5 monthly minimum wage per capita (PR = 1.37; 95% CI 1.22-1. 54), continued to be associated with higher rates of inadequate prenatal care utilization. Racial disparity regarding adequate utilization of prenatal services was detected, with black (PR = 1.19; 95% CI 1.04-1.36) and mulatto (PR = 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.26) women showing higher rates of inadequate use. On the other hand, women covered by the FHP - Family Health Program (PR = 0.92; 95% CI 0.85-0.98) showed a lower rate of inadequate prenatal care utilization.ConclusionsDespite strong expansion of health services and expressive improvements in adequate prenatal care use and social indicators, inequalities in prenatal care use still persist. The FHP seems to be effective in reducing inadequate prenatal care utilization.