SUMMARYPurpose: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an emerging surgical option for people with medically refractory epilepsy that is not suitable for resective surgery, or in whom surgery has failed. Our main aim was to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMN) DBS for seizure control in generalized epilepsy and frontal lobe epilepsy with a two-center, single-blind, controlled trial. Methods: Participants were adults with refractory generalized or frontal lobe epilepsy. Seizure diaries were kept by patients/carers prospectively from enrollment. The baseline preimplantation period was followed by a control period consisting of a blind stimulation-OFF phase of at least 3 months, a 3-month blind stimulation-ON phase, and a 6-month unblinded stimulation-ON phase. The control period was followed by an unblinded long-term extension phase with stimulation-ON in those patients in whom stimulation was thought to be effective. Key Findings: Eleven patients were recruited at King's College Hospital (London, United Kingdom United Kingdom) and at University Hospital La Princesa (Madrid, Spain). Among the five patients with frontal lobe epilepsy, only one patient had >50% improvement in seizure frequency during the blind period. In the long-term extension phase, two patients with frontal lobe epilepsy had >50% improvement in seizure frequency. All six patients with generalized epilepsy had >50% improvement in seizure frequency during the blind period. In the long-term extension phase, five of the six patients showed >50% improvement in the frequency of major seizures (one became seizure free, one had >99% improvement, and three had 60-95% reduction in seizure frequency). Among patients with generalized epilepsy, the DBS implantation itself appears to be effective, as two patients remained seizure free during 12 and 50 months with DBS OFF, and the remaining four had 50-91% improvement in the initial 3 months with DBS OFF. Significance: DBS implantation and stimulation of the CMN appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment, particularly in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy. CMN stimulation was not as effective in frontal lobe epilepsy, which requires further studies. DBS of the CMN should be considered as a treatment option, particularly in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy syndromes.
SignificanceEpisodic memories detail our personally experienced past. The formation and retrieval of these memories have long been thought to be supported by a division of labor between the neocortex and the hippocampus, where the former processes event-related information and the latter binds this information together. However, it remains unclear how the 2 regions interact. We uncover directional coupling between these regions, with power decreases in the neocortex that precede and predict power increases in the hippocampus during memory formation. Fascinatingly, this process reverses during memory retrieval, with hippocampal power increases preceding and predicting neocortical power decreases. These results suggest a bidirectional flow of information between the neocortex and hippocampus is fundamental to the formation and retrieval of episodic memories.
The results suggest that approximately 70% of patients with existing VNS insertions could have significant additional benefit from cardiac based seizure detection and closed loop stimulation from the AspireSR device. For new insertions, the AspireSR device has efficacy in 59% of patients. The 'rule of thirds' used in counseling patients may need to be modified accordingly.
Case reports, by virtue of their simplicity, are ideal for the novice writer. The temptation is to write up anything that is remotely interesting in the hope that you get your name in print. One soon discovers that this is a self-defeating exercise when rejections of a mediocre manuscript come a plenty. Choosing an appropriate case is the difficult first step and getting started remains a challenge for the uninitiated. This article outlines our systematic approach for busy junior doctors to write high-quality and meaningful case reports with relative ease.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.