No abstract

No abstract

In Experiment 1, 328 adjectives were presented to subjects for rating of imagery (I), ease of definition (ED), and animateness (A). The normative value of these indices is tabulated for each adjective. A correlational analysis of these measures and Kucera-Francis frequency (KF) is also presented. To demonstrate the usefulness of these rating scales, Experiment 2 requested subjects to free recall a list of 50 adjectives after they completed an incidental learning task of rating these adjectives for I, ED, or A. The subjects recalled more high I than low I adjectives and more difficult-than easy-to-define adjectives regardless of which incidental rating task they performed. Neither the degree of animateness nor the KF value of the adjectives influenced the percentage of recall.Normative data on the attributes of words relevant to their storage and retrieval characteristics exist for nouns (e.g., Paivio, Yuille, & Madigan, 1968) and for verbs (e.g., Klee & Legge, 1976), but similar data are not readily available for adjectives, despite a considerable interest in the role played by adjectives in the memory of phrases and sentences. For example, Kusyszyn and Paivio (1966) have studied the recall of adjective-noun pairs as a function of word order and of noun abstractness. Horowitz and Manelis (1972) have studied the degree of unity between adjective-noun pairs and the kinds of bonding that exist. Deese (1965) andJohnson (1970) have found that a noun generally elicits a greater diversity of associates than does an adjective. Lockhart (1969) andPeterson (1971) attempted to study the effect of the imagery rating and grammatical classification (noun or adjective) on cued and free recall. Unfortunately, Lockhart did not have normative data on the adjectives and nominalized Requests for reprints should be sent to Neal

No abstract