Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are life-threatening conditions with high morbidity and mortality. Supportive care management of SJS/TEN is highly variable. A systematic review of the literature was performed by dermatologists, ophthalmologists, intensivists and gynecologists with expertise in SJS/TEN to generate statements for supportive care guideline development. Members of the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists (SDH) with expertise in SJS/TEN were invited to participate in a modified, online Delphi-consensus. 9-point Likert scale questionnaires regarding 135 statements were administered. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was employed to evaluate and select proposed statements for guideline inclusion; statements with median ratings of 6.5-9 and disagreement index ≤1 were included in the guideline. For the final round, the guidelines were appraised by all the participants. An evidence-based discussion and recommendations for hospital setting and care team, wound care, ocular care, oral care, urogenital care, pain management, infection surveillance, fluid and electrolyte management, nutrition and stress ulcer prophylaxis, airway management, and anticoagulation in adult patients with SJS/TEN are included.

Background/Objectives: Vulvar disease leads to significant disease burden and reduced quality of life (QOL). However, vulvar disease-specific instruments to measure QOL are lacking. We developed the Vulvar Quality of Life Index (VQLI) to comprehensively and reproducibly assess symptomatic, psychosexual and physical aspects of vulvar disease. Methods:The VQLI was inferred from a review of the literature regarding QOL of vulvar disease, and responses from a cohort of patients attending specialist clinics. Seven domains and a 15-item questionnaire were developed. This was tested and optimised prior to validation on 248 women, using a control group as a baseline. The VQLI was further tested on 157 women, and the total VQLI score was compared to a self-determined Likert global score on how vulvar disease had impacted their overall health. Results:The VQLI had excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha, 0.93), and test-retest reliability showed that 9/15 questions had a substantial weighted kappa value of 0.5 or above, with good intraclass correlation coefficient (0.88; CI 0.8-0.93). Spearman correlations were consistently positive. Further testing on 157 women demonstrated a significant relationship between the total VQLI score and the effect of vulvar disease on overall health, with high levels of the impact of vulvar disease on overall health associated with high total VQLI score (P < 0.001). Conclusions:The VQLI is a validated, fast and reliable tool to measure the global impact of vulvar disease on QOL and can be used to monitor response to treatment or in a research setting.

Background: There is a need for improvement in informed medical consent to address the lack of standardization and to increase patient engagement. Objective: To investigate the use of a video to aid informed consent for Mohs micrographic surgery and evaluate patient understanding, satisfaction, anxiety, and time savings relative to verbal consent. Methods: A 2-armed randomized controlled trial involving 102 patients compared video-assisted consent with a control group who underwent consent in the standard verbal manner. All participants underwent questionnaire-based testing of knowledge, satisfaction, and anxiety, and the time of each consultation was measured. Results: Patients who watched the video performed significantly better in the knowledge questionnaire compared with the control group (P = .02), were more satisfied with their understanding of the risks of Mohs micrographic surgery (P = .013), and spent less time with their physician (P = .008). Additionally, 78.4% of video group patients reported that they preferred seeing the video before speaking with their physician. Limitations: The study design may not replicate day-today clinical practice. Conclusion: Video-assisted consent for Mohs micrographic surgery improves patient knowledge, leads to a better understanding of the risks, and saves physicians time without compromising patient satisfaction and anxiety levels in this study setting.