Brain metastases (BM) occur in 20–40% of patients with cancer and 60–75% of patients with BM become symptomatic. Due to an aging population and advances in the treatment of primary cancers, patients are living longer and are more likely to experience complications from BM. The diagnosis of BM drastically worsens long-term survival rates, with multiple metastases being a poor prognostic factor. Until recently, the mainstay of treatment consisted of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), surgical resection, whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT), or a combination of these modalities. Systemic chemotherapy has been felt largely ineffective in the treatment of BM due to the presence of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), which includes efflux pumps on brain capillaries. Over the past decade however, researchers have identified therapeutic agents that are able to cross the BBB. These findings could make a multimodality treatment approach possible, consisting of surgery, radiation, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy, which could lead to better disease control in this patient population and prolong survival. In this review, we discuss present evidence on available targeted therapies and their role in the treatment of BM from primary tumors with the highest prevalence of central nervous system (CNS) involvement, specifically non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), breast cancer melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma.

No abstract

As testing for neuronal antibodies become more readily available, the spectrum of conditions potentially associated with these autoantibodies has been widening. Voltage-gated calcium channel antibodies (VGCC-Ab) are no exception to this trend. The significance of an elevated VGCC-Ab titer beyond its original clinicopathological correlate, Lambert-Eaton myasthenic syndrome (LEMS) remains undetermined. We sought to determine the diagnostic significance of an elevated serum VGCC-Ab titer in a large single-center cohort of 100 patients. The majority of patients (58%) with elevated VGCC-Ab levels lacked an inflammatory or autoimmune etiology of their neurologic diagnosis. Only six cases (6%) of LEMS and two cases (2%) of SCLC (without LEMS) were identified. No significant differences in antibody titers were seen between the autoimmune and non-autoimmune groups. These findings support the notions that: (a) elevated VGCC-Ab titers without clinical correlation must be interpreted with caution, and (b) the clinical and electrodiagnostic criteria for LEMS should remain the mainstay in the diagnosis of LEMS.

No abstract