IMPORTANCE Robust and sensitive imaging biomarkers for visual function are an unmet medical need in the management of neovascular age-related macular degeneration. OBJECTIVE To determine the correlation of 3-dimensionally quantified intraretinal cystoid fluid (IRC) and subretinal fluid (SRF) with best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in treatment-naive neovascular age-related macular degeneration and during antiangiogenic therapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Retrospective cohort study between November 2009 and November 2011 at an institutional referral center and reading center of patients with treatment-naive subfoveal choroidal neovascularization receiving intravitreal ranibizumab or aflibercept over 12 months. All individual IRC and SRF lesions were manually delineated on each of the 128 B-scan sections of spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic volume scans at baseline and months 1, 6, and 12. Correlations were computed between the IRC and SRF parameters and the baseline BCVA, final BCVA, and BCVA change. A systematic parameter search was conducted to detect annotation-derived variables with best predictive value. An exponential model for BCVA change balancing for the ceiling effect was constructed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Goodness of fit of correlations between the IRC and SRF parameters and the baseline BCVA, final BCVA, and BCVA change. RESULTS Thirty-eight patients were included (25 female, 13 male; mean [SD] age at enrollment, 78.49 [8.23] years; mean [SD] BCVA score at baseline, 54 [16] Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study letters [Snellen equivalent approximately 20/160], with a gain to 63 [19] letters [Snellen equivalent approximately 20/100] at month 12). A total of 19 456 scans underwent complete quantification of IRC and SRF. The best correlation with BCVA at baseline was achieved using a coverage-based, foveal area-weighted IRC parameter (R 2 = 0.59; P < .001). The same baseline parameter also predicted BCVA at 12 months (R 2 = 0.21; P = .003). The BCVA gain correlated with IRC decrease in the exponential model (R 2 = 0.40; P < .001) and linear model (R 2 = 0.25; P = .002). No robust associations were found between SRF and baseline BCVA (R 2 = 0.06; P = .14) or BCVA change (R 2 = 0.14; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this proof-of-principle study, IRC-derived morphometric variables correlated well with treatment-naive BCVA and BCVA outcomes in antiangiogenic therapy. While IRC reduction was associated with BCVA gains, some IRC-mediated neurosensory damage remained permanent.
Background/aims
The purpose of the study was to create a standardised protocol for choroidal thickness measurements and to determine whether choroidal thickness measurements made on images obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source (SS-) OCT from patients with healthy retina are interchangeable when performed manually or with an automatic algorithm.
Methods
36 grid cell measurements for choroidal thickness for each volumetric scan were obtained, which were measured for SD-OCT and SS-OCT with two methods on 18 eyes of healthy volunteers. Manual segmentation by experienced retinal graders from the Vienna Reading Center and automated segmentation on >6300 images of the choroid from both devices were statistically compared.
Results
Model-based comparison between SD-OCT/SS-OCT showed a systematic difference in choroidal thickness of 16.26±0.725 μm (p<0.001) for manual segmentation and 21.55±0.725 μm (p<0.001) for automated segmentation. Comparison of automated with manual segmentations revealed small differences in thickness of −0.68±0.513 μm (p=0.1833). The correlation coefficients for SD-OCT and SS-OCT measures within eyes were 0.975 for manual segmentation and 0.955 for automatic segmentation.
Conclusion
Choroidal thickness measurements of SD-OCT and SS-OCT indicate that these two devices are interchangeable with a trend of choroidal thickness measurements being slightly thicker on SD-OCT with limited clinical relevance. Use of an automated algorithm to segment choroidal thickness was validated in healthy volunteers.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.