Institutional, teleological and consensual blockchain jurisdiction manifestations have been articulated in the activities of the public administration concerning interventional, contributory, protective, delegated, executive and efficient public administration. The authors have revealed the service format of functioning and synergy of the cross-border interaction of public administration within horizontal and vertical relations with the subjects of public and private law. Legitimacy of transformational remodelling of power, as well as the specifics of the values intercourse in information and traditional societies in the framework of implementing the powers of cross-border public administration through the simulation category. The paper highlights the functioning dynamics of cross-border public administration in the external and internal dimension in terms of using such instruments of public administration, as regulatory and administrative acts, acts-plans, acts-actions, administrative contracts. Fundamental influence of technological innovations on the public service activities of public administration has been proved in a transboundary perspective to achieve the rule of law, the maximum legal certainty of streamlining the process of public governance. Institutionalization of the synergetic paradigm has been established for using the tools of public administration within the blockchain jurisdiction to properly implement the cross-border competence of public administration, which will contribute to the adaptation of national law to the supranational legal framework. The authors have specified that, with proper implementation of the competence of cross-border public administration within the blockchain jurisdiction, there is a ‘self-propelled’ system with a measurable number of variables for institutionalization of such an organizational structure, which could be self- reproducible in the presence of corresponding internal and external links with the allocation of order parameters

The purpose of the paper is to study the preconditions of the necessity to use new scientific tools during the study of issues related to the ensuring and protection of human right to access to public information; to characterize the main scientific approaches to modern researches in the sphere of safeguarding human right to access to public information; to identify promising directions for further research on this topic. Methodology. The paper presents the examples of a negative use of scientific methodology in conducting research in the area of administrative law and procedure and also draws attention to the need to reconsider an obsolete scientific methodology that does not correspond to the current realities and negatively affects the development of legal science. It indicates and characterizes the main preconditions of the necessity to use new scientific tools while investigating the issues related to ensuring and protection of human right to access to public information. In the context of the research of peculiarities of administrative and legal coverage and protection of human right to access to public information, it is proposed to use the systems approach, which is extremely effective in analysing complicated legal phenomena and processes and permits to study the peculiarities of substantive, procedure and procedural legal regulation as a cohesive whole. Practical implications. The system approach is an extremely promising technique for studying legal reality. Its use allows synthesizing all the knowledge about legal phenomena (legal rules, legal relations, legal consciousness, etc.), which is accumulated during the past stages of formation and development of domestic legal science, for a deeper insight into the development and functioning of law in general and administrative law in particular. Value/originality. Problems that exist in legal science in general and in the science of administrative law, in particular, can be solved only with the help of new scientific tools, specifically, by applying the system approach. The use of the systems approach in case of studying the issues of ensuring and protection of the human right to access to public information would allow combining all studies that were performed on this issue in substantive, procedure or procedural parts of the administrative law.

Die Länder-Analysen bieten regelmäßig im kostenlosen Abonnement kompetente Einschätzungen aktueller politischer, wirtschaftlicher, sozialer und kultureller Entwicklungen in Ostmitteleuropa und der GUS. Alle Länder-Analysen verstehen sich als Teil eines gemeinsamen Projektes, das der wissenschaftlich fundierten, allgemeinverständlich formulierten Analyse der Entwicklungen im östlichen Europa, der Offenheit für verschiedene inhaltliche Positionen und der kostenlosen und nicht-kommerziellen Information einer breit verstandenen interessierten Öffentlichkeit verpflichtet ist. Autor/innen sind internationale Fachwissenschaftler/innen und Expert/innen. Die Redaktionen der Länder-Analysen bestehen aus Wissenschaftler/innen mit langjähriger Forschungserfahrung.Die deutschsprachigen Länder-Analysen werden gemeinsam von der Forschungsstelle Osteuropa an der Universität Bremen, dem Zentrum für Osteuropa-und internationale Studien, der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Osteuropakunde, dem Deutschen Polen-Institut, dem Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Transformationsökonomien und dem Leibniz-Institut für Ost-und Südosteuropaforschung herausgegeben. Die englischsprachigen Länder-Analysen erscheinen in Kooperation der Forschungsstelle Osteuropa mit dem Center for Security Studies (CSS) der ETH Zürich. Die Länder-Analysen bieten regelmäßig Kurzanalysen zu aktuellen Themen, ergänzt um Grafiken und Tabellen sowie Dokumentationen. Zusätzlich gibt es eine Chronik aktueller Ereignisse.

No abstract

Previously unsolved problems. Recently, the Ukrainian state has been actively involved in creating elements of the market innovation system and adapting science as its most important element to new political, social and economic conditions. However, the actions of the public administration agencies in this area were not always systematic and consistent. As a result, new and old forms of organization of science both exist in parallel, and come into conflict to some extent. A number of areas of public administration of science does not have adequate human resources, information and analytical, financial support.The foregoing requires the need to form a complete and perfect concept of state policy in the field of science in Ukraine and to determine the key determinants of its effectiveness.Main part. The question of the legal nature of scientific law is very complex and in many ways contradictory. Today, as far as the mentioned area of law scholars express very different views on its place in the system of domestic law which basically comes to the fact that the scientific law is a complex branch of law 1 . Expressing personal attitude to the mentioned above point of view, we assert that it is not possible to accept it.Paying detailed consideration to this aspect we should quote R. Melnyk who is in his turn emphisizes, the theoretical and practical inappropriate use of the concept of "complex area of law", which only complicates the understanding of the national legal system, causing problems in lawmaking and law enforcement 2 .Today, unfortunately, we have to admit that juris dictionis not always focused on the needs of law enforcement, which in particular is unlikely to be satisfied with the term "complex area of law" in the legal dispute, in this case, involving research subjects activity, as judges must clearly understand the legal nature of legal disputes, which, of course,