Insulin aspart is a short‐acting insulin analogue that is used to control postprandial glycemia levels in diabetic patients. The aim of this clinical trial was to compare the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of GP40071 (GP‐Asp) and NovoRapid Penfill (Novo‐Asp) in a hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC). This trial was conducted as a part of a GP40071 biosimilar clinical development program. This was a phase I randomized, double‐blind, two‐period crossover study. Twenty‐six healthy male volunteers aged 18 to 45 years who met the inclusion criteria underwent the procedure of an HEC following a single subcutaneous injection of 0.3 IU/kg of either GP‐Asp or Novo‐Asp into the abdomen. After doses, plasma glucose levels were monitored every 5 minutes for 8 hours. The adjustment of the glucose infusion rate (GIR) was based on the blood glucose measurements. The GIR values were used to evaluate the PD profiles of the studied drugs. Regular blood sampling was performed during the study to obtain sufficient pharmacokinetic data. The 90% confidence intervals for the geometric mean ratios of the pharmacokinetic (AUCins.0‐t, Cins.max) and pharmacodynamic (GIRmax, AUCGIR0‐t) parameters of GP‐Asp were within the 80%–125% comparability limits. The safety profiles of the drugs were also comparable. Bioequivalence, similar PD, and safety of GP‐Asp and Novo‐Asp were demonstrated.

No abstract

Aim: To compare safety (immunogenicity) and efficacy of GP40061 insulin glargine (GP-Gla) and Lantus® (Sanofi glargine, Sa-Gla) in people with diabetes mellitus. Materials & methods: This randomized open-label, 26-week clinical trial enrolled 180 Type 1 diabetes mellitus patients (HbA1c 6.5–12.0%), randomized 1:1 to once daily GP-Gla (n = 90) or Sa-Gla (n = 90). The primary end point was immune response at 26th week. Results: The frequency of immune response was similar in GP-Gla and Sa-Gla (p = 1.000). Groups were similar in terms of other safety end points. Mean HbA1c change from baseline was -0.66% for GP-Gla and -0.77% for Sa-Gla, and did not differ between groups (p = 0.326). Insulin doses, fasting plasma glucose and seven-point glucose profiles were similar between groups. Conclusion: GP-Gla and Sa-Gla demonstrated similar safety and efficacy. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04022993

This study includes modeling and simulation of insulin aspart pharmacokinetics (PK). The authors used PK data of biosimilar insulins—insulin aspart and biphasic insulin aspart 30/70—to develop a predictive population PK model for the insulins. The model was built via Monolix software, taking into account the weight‐based dosing and the dose and body‐weight effects on the parameters. The model‐based simulations were performed using the R package mlxR for various administered doses and various ratios of insulin aspart forms for a better understanding of the insulin behavior. The optimal model was a 1‐compartment model with a combination of zero‐ and first‐order absorptions, with absorption lag for the soluble form of insulin aspart and first‐order absorption for the insulin aspart protamine suspension. The assumption of identical behavior of 2 insulins at the distribution and elimination phases was made. The developed PK model was fitted successfully to the experimental data, and all fitted parameters displayed a moderate coefficient of variation. The PK model allows us to predict PK profiles for various doses and formulations of insulin aspart and can be used to improve the accuracy, safety, and ethics of novel clinical trials of insulin.

Aim: To compare safety (immunogenicity) and efficacy of a biosimilar insulin GP-Lis25 and a reference insulin Ly-Lis25 (Humalog Mix 25) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) patients. Materials & methods: This randomized open-label, 26-week clinical trial enrolled 210 T2D patients, randomized 1:1 to twice-daily GP-Lis25 or Ly-Lis25. The primary end point was immune response at 26th week. Noninferiority margin for HbA1c was 0.4%. Results: Immune response frequency was similar in GP-Lis25 and Ly-Lis25 groups both at week 12 (p = 0.651) and 26 (p = 0.164). The difference of HbA1c change at week 26 was (95% CI) 0.01 (-0.27–0.28)%. Fasting plasma glucose, seven-point glucose profile and insulin dose were similar between groups. Safety did not differ between groups. Conclusion: GP-Lis25 and Ly-Lis25 demonstrated similar safety and efficacy. ClincalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023344 .