To investigate the influence of microcystic, elongated and fragmented (MELF) pattern invasion on preoperative evaluation of lymph node (LN) metastasis and myometrial invasion in patients with lowgrade endometrial carcinoma. Methods: The study included 192 consecutive patients with low-grade endometrial carcinoma who underwent preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), followed by surgery. One hundred sixty one of 192 patients underwent LN dissection and were analyzed for LN metastasis. All patients were analyzed for myometrial invasion. Presence of enlarged LN was evaluated by using size criteria on CT. Depth of myometrial invasion was evaluated on MRI using T 2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging and contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted imaging comprehensively. Sensitivity and specificity for LN metastasis and deep myometrial invasion were evaluated for MELF group and non-MELF group. The difference of sensitivity between two groups was compared using Chi-square and Fisher's exact test. Results: MELF pattern invasion was identified in 43/192 patients (22%). LN metastases were observed in 18/39 patients in MELF group and 6/122 patients in non-MELF group for pelvic LN and 11/29 patients in MELF group and 4/57 patients in non-MELF group for para-aortic LN. Sensitivity for the detection of pelvic LN metastasis in MELF group was significantly lower than in non-MELF group (16.7% vs 66.7%). As for the assessment of the deep myometiral invasion, pathological deep myometrial invasion were found in 31/43 patients in MELF group and 32/149 patients in non-MELF group. Sensitivity in MELF group showed lower values than in non-MELF group (54.8% vs 78.1% for reader 1, 54.8% vs 62.5% for reader 2), although there was no statistically significant difference (P = 0.09 for reader 1 and P = 0.72 for reader 2). Conclusion: In case of low-grade endometrial carcinoma with MELF pattern invasion, preoperative staging by CT and MRI have a risk for underestimation.

No abstract

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the most accurate magnetic resonance (MR) sequence for tumor detection, maximal tumor diameter, and parametrial invasion compared with histopathologic diagnoses.Methods: Fifty-one patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2018 IB1 to IIB cervical cancer underwent preoperative MR imaging and surgical resection. Two radiologists independently evaluated the tumor detection, parametrial invasion, and tumor size in each of T2-weighted image, diffusion-weighted image, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image. Results obtained for squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma were also compared. Results:Neither the tumor detection rate nor parametrial invasion was found to be significantly different among sequences. Tumor size assessment using MR imaging with pathology showed good correlation: r = 0.63-0.72. The adenocarcinoma size tended to be more underestimated than SCC in comparison with the pathologic specimen.Conclusions: Cervical cancer staging by MR images showed no significant difference among T2-weighted image, diffusion-weighted image, and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image. Adenocarcinoma was prone to be measured as smaller than the pathologic specimen compared with SCC.

Aim To elucidate correlation between signal intensity on diffusion‐weighted images (SI‐DWI) and clinical backgrounds for uterine adenomyosis and to compare SI‐DWI of adenomyosis and malignant uterine tumors. Methods This study examined 46 adenomyosis patients diagnosed using magnetic resonance imaging and 25 patients with surgically confirmed malignant uterine myometrial tumor. First, adenomyosis cases were classified visually into high‐intensity and low‐intensity groups based on the SI‐DWI compared with that of normal uterine myometrium. Secondly, correlation was assessed between SI‐DWI of adenomyosis and patient clinical background information such as age, menopausal status, menstrual cycle and dysmenorrhea severity. Third, quantitative comparison was made of low‐intensity adenomyosis (LIA), high‐intensity adenomyosis (HIA) and malignant tumor groups for the signal intensity ratio (SIR) on DWI and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Their diagnostic performance was evaluated using logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results The 46 adenomyosis cases were classified as 26 low‐intensity and 20 high‐intensity cases. Significant correlation was found only for menstrual cycle phases. HIA had significantly lower SIR and higher ADC than malignant tumor. The ADC of HIA was significantly higher than that of LIA. The combination of SIR and ADC showed excellent diagnostic performance (area under ROC curve, 0.99). Conclusion There is a variation in signal intensity on DWI of uterine adenomyosis and it is associated with menstrual cycle phase. Adenomyosis with high signal intensity on DWI can be differentiated from malignant lesions by its lower signal intensity on DWI and higher ADC than that found for malignant uterine tumors, however overlaps exist.

To compare the diagnostic performance of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MR (DCE-MR) and delayed contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI added to unenhanced MRI, including diffusion weighted image (DWI) for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors, conducting a retrospective blinded image interpretation study.Methods: Data of 80 patients suspected of having adnexal tumors by ultrasonography between April 2008 and August 2018 were used for the study. All patients had undergone preoperative MRI and surgical resection at our institution. Four radiologists (two specialized in gynecological radiology and two nonspecialized) were enrolled for blinded review of the MR images. A 3-point scale was used: 0 = benign, 1 = indeterminate, and 2 = malignant. Three imaging sets were reviewed: Set A, unenhanced MRI including DWI; Set B, Set A and delayed CE-T1WI; and Set C, Set A and DCE-MRI. Imaging criteria for benign and malignant tumors were given in earlier reports. The diagnostic performance of the three imaging sets of the four readers was calculated. Their areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared using the DeLong method.Results: Accuracies of Set B were 81%-88%. Those of Set C were 81%-85%. The AUCs of Set B were 0.83 and 0.89. Those of Set C were 0.81-0.86. For two readers, Set A showed lower accuracy and AUC than Set B/Set C (less than 0.80), although those were equivalent in other readers. No significant difference in AUCs was found among the three sequence sets. Intrareader agreement was moderate to almost perfect in Sets A and B, and substantial to almost perfect in Set C. Conclusion:DCE-MR showed no superiority for differentiating malignant adnexal tumors from benign tumors compared to delayed CE-T1WI with conventional MR and DWI.